Skyfall (upcoming James Bond film)

Tools    





If you want to achieve greatness, stop asking for permission
Albert Finney joins 'Bond 23'

While we know very little reliable info about the story that will be featured in the film, the cast is shaping up to be capable of fulfilling those hopes. Daniel Craig returns as James Bond, and Judi Dench returns to play M. And in this installment we’ll see one of M’s powerful superior government officers, played by Albert Finney.

We haven’t seen much of Finney in a few years, as he has been battling cancer. His last big films were Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead (a great performance) and The Bourne Ultimatum. Finney will be returning to the Bourne franchise as well, as he is cast in Tony Gilroy’s The Bourne Legacy.
From: slashfilm.com
__________________
"If we choose, we can live in a world of comforting illusion."
- Christopher Nolan



Movie Forums Stage-Hand
I have to admit I am pleasantly surprised about a lot of prequels that have come out. X-men First Class and the new Bond movies are great.



We've gone on holiday by mistake
It is not the Bond that needs replacing its the Director and the owners of the franchise.

Quontam was all about copying Bourne action sequences but with no coherant plot.

Die Another Day was just a huge joke. Invisible Cars, Korean guy becomes an Englishman, silly gadget fest car chases on ice, stupid CGI Bond surfing.

Casino Royale was OK but not great.

The best modern day Bond film was Goldeneye by FAR! The Brosnan films got progressively worse although I don't fault Pierce Brosnan for that.

The best one before that was probably View to a Kill although Moore was slightly too old by then (56 or something).

To make a good Bond film you need;

1. Good Director, even if that is expensive, stop giving nobodies a shot at making a Bond Film, hire Nolan.

2. Memorable Bad Guy, but also a good actor. The two films I mention above had Sean Bean, excellent as 006 and Christopher Walken as Zorin. Get the cheque book out Barbara and hire a couple of decent actors opposite Bond.

3. Bring the clever gadgets back, not the CGI nonsense of Die another Day.

4. Yes the action sequences need updated from the old Judo Chop days of Connery but don't obsess over copying Bourne, Casino Royale got it right but not Quontam.

5. Lets have Bond as a sexist womaniser again. No more Politically correct strong Women opposite Bond just some tart with a decent rack that falls head over heels for Bond.



I'd love to see a seasoned action director like Walter Hill, William Freidkin Richard Donner, Peter Hyams or John McTiernan get a shot at Bond. I think that would be a much safer bet, even if those guys have made as many bad movies as they have good; it just can't get any worse than the last installment for me. I'd aslo like to see a Bond movie partially set in Australia because the series has never gone there before, and some of the landmarks would make for some memorable sequences.



To make a good Bond film you need;

1. Good Director, even if that is expensive, stop giving nobodies a shot at making a Bond Film, hire Nolan.
That's why Sam Mendes is helming the next one.

2. Memorable Bad Guy, but also a good actor. The two films I mention above had Sean Bean, excellent as 006 and Christopher Walken as Zorin. Get the cheque book out Barbara and hire a couple of decent actors opposite Bond.
Ralph Fiennes and Javier Bardem have been cast. Both are excellent actors, though I'd prefer Fiennes as the bad guy. The entire cast that's lined up so far is arguably the most talented in a Bond film.

3. Bring the clever gadgets back, not the CGI nonsense of Die another Day.
There were clever gadgets in both Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace.


5. Lets have Bond as a sexist womaniser again. No more Politically correct strong Women opposite Bond just some tart with a decent rack that falls head over heels for Bond.
What?



it just can't get any worse than the last installment for me.
Quantum of Solace was worse than Moonraker, Die Another Day, The World is not Enough or A View to a Kill? It certainly has its detractors, but to say it's the worst ever Bond film is a big stretch.



Yes Quantum of Solace is a lot worse than all of those in my opinion.

Moonraker is an absolute riot, a flamboyant 70's cheese-fest for the bubblegum set, with a great finale. It was yet another Star Wars cash-in (the end of The Spy Who Loved Me states For Your Eyes Only is the next installment when in-fact they squeezed in Moonraker) and whilst I understand why some purists hate it; I love it for those very same reasons. Come on at least it's fun...Quantum Of Solace is one big snooze fest.

Whilst I think A View To Kill is the weakest of the Roger Moore outings - he was way too old for the role. It's still got a lot going for it, namely Christopher Walken as one of the best baddies of the series, and another memorable sequence on the Eiffel Tower, not to mention a great finale on the Golden Gate Bridge. Grace Jones makes for a striking henchwoman too. At the very least the action sequences are competently handled, which is more than I can say for Solace.

I'm not overly keen on any of the Brosnan entries, but at least they maintain a semblence of the Bond I grew up with, and by that I mean a sense of humour. Plus the editing isn't comparable to watching a car chase/shootout etc on fast forward whilst rolling down a hill. That was my biggest problem with Solace...well that and the overly straight way it was played, the wishywashy plot, boring Bond girls and forgettable gadgets. The film's just got no soul.

If you like the way the series went with Solace then that's fine by me...but I grew up with a different kind of Bond, and I'm a stuck in my ways old fuddy duddy. I wouldn't have it any other way where Bond is concerned .



"He has all the time in the world ... "
I've only really liked two Bond movies: 'You Only Live Twice' & 'The Spy Who Loved Me'. I believe both were directed by Lewis Gilbert. The former cast the mould for most of the rest anyway, especially the finale with the huge set that inevitably gets blown up (or sunk). 'Thunderball' was OK, but I wasn't too wild about the remake.



We've gone on holiday by mistake
I've only really liked two Bond movies: 'You Only Live Twice' & 'The Spy Who Loved Me'. I believe both were directed by Lewis Gilbert. The former cast the mould for most of the rest anyway, especially the finale with the huge set that inevitably gets blown up (or sunk). 'Thunderball' was OK, but I wasn't too wild about the remake.
I have to say that those 2 are prob my top 2 aswell. You Only Live Twice is my number 1 no question.

I'm also a fan of Moonraker despite the hate that it recieves on this forum.

For me, You Only Live Twice, Spy who loved me, Goldeneye, Goldfinger and perhaps Live and Let Die stand apart from the rest.



We've gone on holiday by mistake
That's why Sam Mendes is helming the next one.

Ralph Fiennes and Javier Bardem have been cast. Both are excellent actors, though I'd prefer Fiennes as the bad guy. The entire cast that's lined up so far is arguably the most talented in a Bond film.

There were clever gadgets in both Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace.

What?
Glad to hear about Sam Mendes. If he succeeds they should let him do a few more. But they won't because he will want more money, so they will revert to some nobody Director and off we go again.

If Bardem and Fiennes are lined up then that can only be fantastic news. 2 of the finest Villains of modern times in, Antoine Sugur (spelt wrong probably) and Voldemort.

Can't remember the Gadgets in Casino although I thought the whole poisoning scene was a little silly. I certainly won't be watching Quontam EVER again so not sure what gadgets there were.

My number 5 suggestion was a semi joke. However it annoys me when Judi Dench is going on about having the "balls" to send Bond out to die or Moneypenny dishing out the one liners to Bond unlike the old ones. Although Xena "Onatop" was probably one of the strongest female leads in a Bond but that seems to work.

For the record I think that Die Another Day is by far the worst Bond but Quontam comes in at a close second, followed by For Your Eyes Only which is so unmemorable I think I ve only seen it once, whereas Ive probably seen the other Roger Moore ones 10-20 times.



"He has all the time in the world ... "
I have to say that those 2 are prob my top 2 aswell. You Only Live Twice is my number 1 no question.
Yes it has Kissy Suzuki (Mia Hama) driving that classic Toyota GT 2000, Little Nellie (The Wallis Autogyro) & that brilliant John Barry theme sung by Nancy Sinatra, what more could you ask for?

I'm also a fan of Moonraker despite the hate that it recieves on this forum.
Well, Louis Chiles looks good in it.

For me, You Only Live Twice, Spy who loved me, Goldeneye, Goldfinger and perhaps Live and Let Die stand apart from the rest.
I forgot about From Russia with Love, which is one of the better Connery one's.



I'm going to go out on a limb here and admit that I've never liked Judi Dench as M. I think she's a fantastic actress, and understand the desire to move the series forward, but the likes of Bernard Lee and Robert Brown are sadly missed. I'm honestly not trying to be chauvinistic, but I just prefer the stuffy boys club atmosphere you got when M was played by a man. For me it worked better in the Bond universe. There's certainly a new dynamic there with Dench's M, but I want the old school back.

I'd love to see Michael Gambon replace her. He'd be great for the role in my opinion, but I know I'm probably in a minority.




Sit Ubu Sit.... Good Dog
Bond 23: The "Skyfall" Press Conference

November 3rd 2011



It's official, "Skyfall" is the name of the upcoming 23rd James Bond film and the third to star actor Daniel Craig in the role.
The announcement was made at a press conference in London just moments ago where Craig, director Sam Mendes, Dame Judi Dench, and producers Michael G. Wilson and Barbara Broccoli were on hand to announce the start of production on the project which will hit cinemas October/November next year.


The press conference saw the confirmation of various casting rumours that have been floating around over the past few months. Aside from Craig returning as 007 and Dench as M we'll see Berenice Marlohe as a glamourous character named 'Severin' and Naomie Harris as field agent called 'Eve' (so she's not Miss Moneypenny as previously rumoured?). Harris added that training for her role has so far included yoga, stunt driving and firing machine guns.
Javier Bardem is confirmed as the villain but his name or character arc weren't disclosed. Ben Whishaw, Ralph Fiennes and Albert Finney are also confirmed but what kind of roles they're playing the organisers remained quiet on. When asked if we might recognise their character names and that's why they're being kept quiet, Mendes responded "they might do, then again, they might not".


Mendes says the tone is "classic elements of a Bond film and lots of action", those worried by the reports that he's cutting back on the thrills in favour of a more awards movie tone - "action needs to co-exist with the drama… a Bond movie is for the audience, and only for the audience".
Mendes added that the big draw for him was Craig's work in "Casino Royale" and admits that once this film is done, if he's still as excited about doing Bond as he is now then he'd come back to helm another.
Asked whether the budget for this one will be cut back, Broccoli amusingly replied "does it look like we're cutting back", while Wilson adds "everything is as it was in the last two films."
One change though from the last two films will be the story. Mendes confirms that while the style will be the same, this film is a standalone so the 'Quantum' organisation will NOT be involved.


EON has also released a short synopsis: "Bond’s loyalty to M is tested as her past comes back to haunt her. As MI6 comes under attack, 007 must track down and destroy the threat, no matter how personal the cost."
The title reportedly has an emotional context that "will become clear when we see the film" according to Broccoli.
Asked about the opening musical theme, they say various people have been considered for the theme but at this stage they can't announce anyone as no-one is set yet.
Filming kicks off today at Pinewood Studios in the UK with large portions of it to be shot around the Whitehall area. Other locations will include Shanghai, Istanbul and Scotland. A lot of things are also reportedly being done in preparation for the 50th anniversary of the franchise next year.
Below is the link to the press conference, for some reason it will not let me embed it.

__________________



"He has all the time in the world ... "
I'm going to go out on a limb here and admit that I've never liked Judi Dench as M. I think she's a fantastic actress, and understand the desire to move the series forward, but the likes of Bernard Lee and Robert Brown are sadly missed. I'm honestly not trying to be chauvinistic, but I just prefer the stuffy boys club atmosphere you got when M was played by a man. For me it worked better in the Bond universe. There's certainly a new dynamic there with Dench's M, but I want the old school back.

Wasn't Dench's character based on Dame Stella Rimington who was the director of MI5 between 1992 - 96?

Although personally, I thought Bond was MI6.



I'd like Gambon in the role but if Fiennes is being cast as a franchise bad guy, then could be a bit unlikely.
__________________




Yeah, I think my problem with the current M incarnation is her over involement in the plot of the last few films. I prefered it when M was just a figure you saw at the beginning and end of the movie. It gave the character more of a detatched mystery, and helped to enforce the idea that M represents the higher echelons of power. Bond is always an expendable instrument of destruction, and I always got that without Dench's M hammering it home verbatim in Goldeneye.

Judi Dench has humanised the character a little too much for my liking...and whilst I know a lot of people like this aspect of the story; it really does nothing for me.



"He has all the time in the world ... "
Maybe Dench wanted to bring something new to the role. I can see your point though.



Yeah, I think my problem with the current M incarnation is her over involement in the plot of the last few films. I prefered it when M was just a figure you saw at the beginning and end of the movie. It gave the character more of a detatched mystery, and helped to enforce the idea that M represents the higher echelons of power. Bond is always an expendable instrument of destruction, and I always got that without Dench's M hammering it home verbatim in Goldeneye.

Judi Dench has humanised the character a little too much for my liking...and whilst I know a lot of people like this aspect of the story; it really does nothing for me.
Totally can relate to that, especially in the last one. Tried watching it again the other night and was thinking why is she there for the entire opening act, just completely diminished any power her character had. Makes the whole MI5 organisation seem to consist of her and Bond. Turned it off shortly after. I'm hoping the reasonable success of Tinker Tailor and showing the opposite spectrum of spying can be popular, will encourage a more Cold War era tone and less glorified. Craig is meant to have a beard in it after all.



We've gone on holiday by mistake
I agree. Much better when M was only seen once or twice in the famous office and then later on surprising Bond later on in the British shipwreck in Hong Kong harbour or turning up in Egypt with Q and Moneypenny in tow.

It really doesn't make sense for her to be in the thick of the plot, I mean how many times in War films does the General actually come along on the mission. Almost never.