I just saw the director's cut and I was wondering which cut you like better? I felt the directors cut didn't really add much but a few more shots of gore, which really didn't add anything to overall picture per say.
One shot (the one where Bodiger holds his neck after being stabbed), isn't even alternate footage at all. The director just zoomed in to the original footage, and there is an obvious loss of resolution, in that one shot and it took me out of the action, as a result.
So I felt maybe the director didn't really have a lot to work with to add in, and he was just tinkering too much maybe. But what do you think?
One shot (the one where Bodiger holds his neck after being stabbed), isn't even alternate footage at all. The director just zoomed in to the original footage, and there is an obvious loss of resolution, in that one shot and it took me out of the action, as a result.
So I felt maybe the director didn't really have a lot to work with to add in, and he was just tinkering too much maybe. But what do you think?