The Heisman Trophy, Collegiate Rules, and Capitalism

Tools    





You ready? You look ready.
I really want to respond to both your post and Sedai's right now, but I know I shouldn't. However, Yoda, please give me a list of the terms you want defined when I do reply, as that would be helpful.
__________________
"This is that human freedom, which all boast that they possess, and which consists solely in the fact, that men are conscious of their own desire, but are ignorant of the causes whereby that desire has been determined." -Baruch Spinoza



planet news's Avatar
Registered User
Resources!

__________________
"Loves them? They need them, like they need the air."



Keep on Rockin in the Free World
The better question is: in what kind of society is it not necessary to completely extricate yourself from mainstream society in order to be free?
No, the better question has already been asked and answered: how do you escape from capitalism? Small lines of flight, obviously.
This is a rhetorical question, obviously, and it's not one that makes sense unless you use a really twisted definition of the word "free."

hey guys, i didn't realize this was a thread topic, i just thought it was an exchange in the shoutbox.

However, while i haven't read through the thread start to finish, i did think there is a Documentary that you may find adresses PN query.

Off the Grid: Life on the Mesa (2007)




from http://www.coolhunting.com
A two-year project, " Off the Grid: Life on the Mesa" is a 64-minute documentary that looks at a small, hardscrabble community in the New Mexico desert of denizens who have chosen a life of independence outside the normal conformities and boundaries of modern society.
It's a study of the runaways, vets and voluntary outcasts who live there and what happens when a community removes itself from mainstream civilization. Rather than becoming uncivilized, instead it enforces its own sense of law and order, right and wrong. When confronted with a thief in their midst, the well-armed and opinionated citizenry must grapple with instilling ad-hoc law and order in which justice is served while humanity is preserved.
Stream the Video here from the Producers website

http://www.snagfilms.com/films/title...e_on_the_mesa/
__________________
"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it." - Michelangelo.



planet news's Avatar
Registered User
Interesting... just don't tell me they have their own little supply-demand economy already!



will.15's Avatar
Semper Fooey
I have no idea what you guys are talking about. You got it so abstract it is practically devoid of meaning. How can you be against capitalism without proposing an alternative?
__________________
It reminds me of a toilet paper on the trees
- Paula



I have no idea what is happening either, other than I somehow started a 6 page discussion on capitalism via a Heisman Trophy shoutbox comment (which is pretty awesome).

Originally Posted by Yoda
There are a number of objections I can summarize if necessary, but for now let's just focus on the most important one: capitalism does not force you to participate. Being offered money, or a product, doesn't actually force you to accept either, and thus you are still "free." Why is this wrong?
This is makes the most sense out of anything I've read in here, and I pose the same question as Yoda. Why is the above wrong?
__________________
If I had a dollar for every existential crisis I've ever had, does money really even matter?



Keep on Rockin in the Free World
Yeah, there's a reason they have "athletic scholarships." I know there are exceptions, but I think the word "most" is pretty accurate there.

I dunno how to fix the system; you can't have it be a financial free-for-all, but as it is now it's clearly not regulated effectively, and there's a good chance it simply can't be. As messed up as it is now, there's an argument to be made that there's no superior alternative.
Conversely, it may surprise you guys to know that Athletic Scholarships don't exist up here in any real way. When my older brother went to Queens University to play Volleyball, the scholarship ensured that if he was selected for the National Team (Olympics, World Championships) he would be able to pick up where he left off for up to 5 years after the fact.

To first qualify for this though, he still was still required to be accepted through regular admissions (80% average from grade 9-13).

I always chuckle a little bit when the Vanier Cup is on TV and as the players are being introduced comen out of the Tunnel the QB is pre-med, OL are kinesiology , Commerce or whatever.

The finances of Secondary Education are completely different of course, tuitions are a fraction of what they are your way, as they are subsidized heavily through our tax structure, and bursaries from the alma mater.


The system i would propose for the major Collegiate sports stateside is with the understanding that for all intents and purposes it acts as the developmental league for the NBA and the NFL and to a lesser degree MLB and a much lesser degree the NHL.

Recruit players now as they do with a few stipulations. Players are eligible to compete from the ages of 18-22. During this time they are not required to attend classes (thus not filling a seat, better used on a Student wishing to complete their degree) Also it allows the athlete to work a part-time gig if he so chooses.

Grants shall be available to all players to pay for housing while in the program.

If the player enters the draft before the Season in which they would turn 22, 20% of their signing bonus is sent back to the school as a transfer payment and held in trust for a term not to exceed 5 years unless there is a involuntary military draft , in which case time in service will be credited back in full.

If a player completes his years of collegiate eligibility, He has a 5 year window to attend the University with teh tuition payments to be paid out of the transfer payment fund.

Furthermore A percentage of swag sales bearing the players Number will be paid to the student on a quarterly basis.


hows that sound MoFo's?



will.15's Avatar
Semper Fooey
Okay by me. At least you wrote something I understand and is on topic.



planet news's Avatar
Registered User
I have no idea what you guys are talking about. You got it so abstract it is practically devoid of meaning. How can you be against capitalism without proposing an alternative?
The same way you're against the political parties and don't vote. You combat the hegemonic system by exercising your right not to vote. This is analogous to Deleuze's "lines of flight".

Get it?



planet news's Avatar
Registered User
It is a small line of flight after all. Apathy is the only form of authentic action you feel you can take, so you take it with all its glory, however minimal.



I don't buy that changing our ways from a Capitalistic society could lead us back to the dark ages or The Third Reich, that just sounds like more of the typical "fear mongering" that gets used everyday to keep us entrenched in the failing system we're in now. And it is a failing system, unless you're one of the ones with a big boatload of cash. You may not see it now, but you will someday. I can see the future.

Many countries have different forms of government and Capitalism is not their driving force and they function just fine. Many of these countries have been around far longer than the good ole U.S. of A too.
__________________
We are both the source of the problem and the solution, yet we do not see ourselves in this light...



will.15's Avatar
Semper Fooey
Which ones? I can't think of any governments that have been around longer than us. Canada and Great Britain have more socialism than us (we have it also), but capitalism exists in those countries also. No country in the world, including us, has a completely free unregulated capitalistic structure. That's why our government works to the extent it does and why the supposedly pure communism in North Korea is such a complete failure. Ideologically pure ecconomic models don't work in the real world.



I don't buy that changing our ways from a Capitalistic society could lead us back to the dark ages or The Third Reich, that just sounds like more of the typical "fear mongering" that gets used everyday to keep us entrenched in the failing system we're in now.
Depends on what we're changing into. Communism doesn't have a great track record. Is it still "fear mongering" if it's probably true? Because some pretty horrifying things have happened in the name of these sorts of revolutions.

And it is a failing system, unless you're one of the ones with a big boatload of cash. You may not see it now, but you will someday.
Our standard of living is way, way higher than it was just a few decades ago. The same is true of every first-world nation. If a system is dramatically raising the standard of living for everyone consistently for a century, what measure is it "failing" under?

I can see the future.
Hehe. Use that knowledge to invest in something.

Many countries have different forms of government and Capitalism is not their driving force and they function just fine. Many of these countries have been around far longer than the good ole U.S. of A too.
I guess it depends on how narrowly you define capitalism. There are varying degrees of free markets, but I don't think there are any wealthy countries that don't have something at least resembling a free market system; some just have a much greater degree of government control on top of it. The differences may seem large here and now, but historically it's all pretty marginal, and I think they'd all be considered capitalistic in a general sense. That's because people almost always choose capitalism when given a choice.

Another thing worth considering: a given country being less capitalistic doesn't necessarily mean much as long as other countries stay capitalistic, because there's still a degree to which it can trade with others and benefit from the innovations that take place in freer nations. So there's probably a degree to which less capitalistic societies look a lot more plausible and sustainable than they are as long as they remain in the minority.



planet news's Avatar
Registered User
The other statements in your last post strike me as inaccurate or over-simplified, but I just cannot let this following misnomer stand:
the supposedly pure communism in North Korea is such a complete failure
North Korea is not pure communism in any way, size, shape, or form. Maybe if you hadn't used the worth "pure" or capitalized the C or distanced yourself more with the "supposedly". If you want a model of a failed Communist state, please at least cite early U.S.S.R.

All in all, this is not about Communism, but I will bring it up, since it's clear that you, as well as others I can imagine, will request an "alternative". I do think John McClane has already made it sufficiently clear why there can be no alternative: Capitalism is too fluid in its appropriation of productivity.

As for PW's suggestion of fear mongering, I would agree, except that the philosopher who proposed it is the same one who formulated Capitalism's greatest critique. Then again... maybe he's in on it, eh?



most of them would never have gotten to college if the weren't athletes.
Absolutely. Sports is an incredible opportunity for kids to get a college education for those that otherwise would never get the chance.
__________________
"Certainly there is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and like it, never really care for anything else thereafter." - Ernest Hemingway



planet news's Avatar
Registered User
Absolutely. Sports is an incredible opportunity for kids to get a college education for those that otherwise would never get the chance.
Honestly---and I never woulda thought I'd feel this way---this warms my heart a little. A LITTLE.