0
Hmm, the argument around animals is not convincing as they just eat and screw, as a general rule. Murder, for example, is not something most animals spend too much time debating. Survival is inherent, it seems, as most animals won't commit suicide unless it's due to a parental need to protect (though there are examples of this not being and the case and examples of those animals that will die for their partners and not just their kids). Humans also eat and screw, just like animals, for the same reasons. The argument as to why all animals feel the need to procreate is just as relevant therefore as how humans perceive the difference between right and wrong, if we are to believe that animals (in which I include humans) have any kind of innate behaviour.
The simple answer to this is 'opinion'. Mine is most likely different to yours and if we believe the argument that right or wrong is innate, in the same way that we believe survival is, we would all think the same way about everything, which we clearly don't (as example, I await your next post on the subject with interest, as it might just argue this point, therefore ironically proving it). Influence is responsible for many things and that may be familial or social. There is no evidence to suggest that racist parents will raise only racist children and, if we took the trouble to check, I'm sure the opposite is just as likely. Individualism should be embraced, as at higher levels (like us), this is what separates us from the rest of the animal kingdom. If only all humanity could use this ability for the greater good, then the planet would be a much better place to live on, for us and the (allegedly) stupid, ignorant animals that share it with us.