That being said, Oldman should have a hell of a lot more than 1 Oscar nom to his name at this point.
He should. Besides DDL: Oldman is probably my favorite actor. Adore that man and his talent.
But like I said earlier, they should've rewarded him years ago. If they do this, and end up screwing over Chalamet for his brilliant performance, they're repeating this Ridiculous Cycle.
Like when they screwed over Denzel Washington for Best Actor in 1993, just to reward Al Pacino for (may I add) one of his lesser performances. Which is also similar to when they screwed over
Al Pacino FOR THE GODFATHER PART II, in favor of Art Carney in 'Harry and Tonto.'
Also, I REALLY LOVED IT when they rewarded Denzel several years after the aforementioned snub (plus a second with 'The Hurricane')--by rewarding him for 'Training Day', screwing over Russell Crowe for his superb performance in 'A Beautiful Mind.' Who (may I add) won for 'Gladiator' a year before that, only because he was snubbed for 'The Insider.'
FUN FACT: Russell Crowe and Denzel were nominated the same year for 'The Hurricane' and 'The Insider' when they were both beaten by Kevin Spacey.
Granted, I believe Spacey was more deserving than them. But If I were to change history and hand either of the two the Oscar: I probably would. Plus, the Public, and (more importantly) the Academy didn't think Spacey was deserving... even after the latter rewarded the f**king guy while in the moment of ‘American Beauty’s’ Awards’ Cleanup.
"OOPS, WE SCREWED UP! HERE'S YOUR STATUES! WE'RE SO SORRY!"
But I suppose It's neat to reward an undeserved veteran... I guess? I can't wait for Timothée Chalamet to win an Oscar for playing Franklin Roosevelt in about 40 years, over a more deserving performance.