Justice League

So nobody has liked this yet? I don't know if I'll see it or not.

And Josh instead of Joss.

a few of them..

I usually like checking some youtube reviewers like Collider, beyond the trailer, armchair directors and i also read reviews posted on RT. It seems some were taking swipes at anything and everything. I really feel critics go into movies wanting to hate and when you want to hate, you will hate.

What is quite telling is the user reviews vs critic reviews. Let's take a look at Nolan trilogy vs MOS, BvS, JL.

Nolan trilogy:

Batman begins - users imdb: 8.3/10, critics RT score: 84%
Dark Knight - users imdb: 9/10, critics RT score: 94%
Dark knight Rises - users imdb: 8.4/10, critics RT score 87%

notice how critics vs audience are pretty consistent. Now let's look at MOS, BvS, JL.

MOS - users imdb: 7.1/10, critics RT score: 55%
BvS - users imdb: 6.6/10, critics RT score: 27%
JL - users imdb: 7.510, critics RT score 39%

Now, look at the discrepancy on these 3, users reviewed these 3 films much more favorably than critics. MOS +20%, BvS + 40%, JL +35%. These are massive gaps.. With the Nolan trilogy, the user - critic gap was -1%, -4%, -3%... wow! what a difference!

This tells us something, critics are not doing a good job here, not sure exactly what is going on but they are far far off from what users say on these 3 films compared to Nolan trilogy. I think MOS was a different take on superman and they weren't open minded enough, BvS same thing and there was a lot of Affleck hate. Mercy from armchair directors, who reviews films, basically refused to pay for a ticket because of Affleck, lol. Then JL, i feel critics went in looking for every possible reason to hate the film. I thought it had flaws but it was fun and characters were great.

I really just want you all angry and confused the whole time.

a few of them..

I usually like checking some youtube reviewers like Collider, beyond the trailer, armchair directors and i also read reviews posted on RT. It seems some were taking swipes at anything and everything. I really feel critics go into movies wanting to hate and when you want to hate, you will hate.

What is quite telling is the user reviews vs critic reviews. Let's take a look at Nolan trilogy vs MOS, BvS, JL.

Nolan trilogy:

Batman begins - users imdb: 8.3/10, critics RT score: 84%
Dark Knight - users imdb: 9/10, critics RT score: 94%
Dark knight Rises - users imdb: 8.4/10, critics RT score 87%

notice how critics vs audience are pretty consistent. Now let's look at MOS, BvS, JL.

MOS - users imdb: 7.1/10, critics RT score: 55%
BvS - users imdb: 6.6/10, critics RT score: 27%
JL - users imdb: 7.510, critics RT score 39%

Now, look at the discrepancy on these 3, users reviewed these 3 films much more favorably than critics. MOS +20%, BvS + 40%, JL +35%. These are massive gaps.. With the Nolan trilogy, the user - critic gap was -1%, -4%, -3%... wow! what a difference!

This tells us something, critics are not doing a good job here, not sure exactly what is going on but they are far far off from what users say on these 3 films compared to Nolan trilogy. I think MOS was a different take on superman and they weren't open minded enough, BvS same thing and there was a lot of Affleck hate. Mercy from armchair directors, who reviews films, basically refused to pay for a ticket because of Affleck, lol. Then JL, i feel critics went in looking for every possible reason to hate the film. I thought it had flaws but it was fun and characters were great.

Why don't you use the critic average rating instead of the actual score? The score is only an indication of how many critics liked the movie. It's not relevant when comparing with the audience score.

Oh okay.

Three of my friends wanted to see Justice League, and I told them I didn't have high hopes for it cause it only got a 27% on rottentomatoes, and they said 'who cares what the critics say'.

So maybe a lot of people don't care what the critics think either.