Rate The Last Movie You Saw

Tools    





Brubaker (1980)

This is a strong film with a strong story to tell. Redford is assured but also amiable in the titular role as the man determined to change the violent and venal penal system. He carries the film very well with good supporting slots from Yaphet Kotto and Jane Alexander. Enjoyed this one if that's the word. Flight of the Condor next...always like watching movies when I do not have a clue what they are going to be about



Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.

Don't Make Me Go (Hannah Marks, 2022)
6/10
Bomba and the Hidden City (Ford Beebe, 1950)
5/10
The Show (Mitch Jenkins, 2020)
5.5/10
Michael Clayton (Tony Gilroy, 2007)
+ 6.5/10

Law firm fixer Michael Clayton (George Clooney) has every right to feel satisfied at the end of his journey.
It Came from Beneath the Sea (Robert Gordon, 1955)
5/10
The Day the Music Died (Mark Moormann, 2022)
7/10
Comanche (George Sherman, 1956)
5/10
Jurassic World Dominion (Colin Trevorrow, 2022)
6/10

T. rex is still roaming the world at the beginning of this episode, but things basically get worse.
Below the Sea (Albert S. Rogell, 1933)
5.5/10
This May Be the Last Time (Sterlin Harjo, 2014)
6.5/10
Persuasion (Carrie Cracknell, 2022)
6/10
The Giant Claw (Fred F. Sears, 1957)
4/10 F/X= 1/10

Speaking of worse, we're talking laughably horrible F/X here but not as bad as Reptilicus.
The Gray Man (Russo Bros., 2022)
+ 6/10
Reptilicus (Poul Bang & Sidney W. Pink, 1961)
4/10 F/X= 0/10
The Black Phone (Scott Derrickson, 2021)
6/10
The Phantom of the Open (Craig Roberts, 2021)
- 6.5/10

Low-key but charming tale of Maurice Flitcroft (Mark Rylance) who somehow qualifies for the British Open never having played a round of golf. He eventually becomes a folk hero even if some don't see it.
Wrong Place (Mike Burns, 2022)
4/10 Idiocy Rating= 9/10
Fathom (Leslie H. Martinson, 1967)
5.5/10
Terminal Norte (Lucrecia Martel, 2021)
5/10
She Will (Charlotte Colbert, 2021)
6/10

Faded, antisocial Hollywood star Alice Krige comes to a remote Scottish retreat with her nurse Kota Eberhardt to recover from her mastectomy and immediately starts experiencing dreams involving burnt witches.
__________________
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts. - John Wooden
My IMDb page



Victim of The Night
It’s always better to go in with low expectations. Especially when dealing with a filmmaker that’s aiming to deliver something specific to his interests, which may not (and probably won’t) align with your predictions and wants.

That said, I think it’s Peele’s best work. I explained why on Twitter and Peele liked it.

I’m now a fanboy.

HYPE FOREVER, BABY! I GOT VALIDATION!
I'm glad to hear this. I thought Us had a lot of positives but was narratively a step down for Peele and some early lukewarm reviews for this have me concerned that he might be a one-trick pony.





Like Crazy, 2016

Beatrice (Valeria Bruni Tedeschi) and Donatella (Micaela Ramazzotti) are both inmates at a psychiatric facility. One day on a short release to a plant nursery, the two women impulsively flee, first boarding a bus and then stealing a car. Beatrice is eager to reclaim some of the perks of her aristocratic former life, while Donatella wants to find the child who was taken away from her after a mental health crisis.

This film is billed as a comedy drama, and the promotion of it leans far more heavily on the comedy aspect. Unfortunately, this framing leads to some tonal inconsistencies that make the film an uneven experience.

It's tempting to talk about the film in two halves: the comedy and the drama.

Donatella's story is tragic and interesting. She had an affair with a married man, who then discarded her when she became pregnant. For most of the film we know that she was committed in part because she tried to kill herself and her infant son, though the specifics are withheld until the final act. Clearly not stable enough to be a parent--or maybe even to be around her child--but also clearly suffering at being separated from him, Donatella's quest to track down her child is the kind of subplot where you at once root for her success and for her failure.

I was mixed on the film's portrayal of the people in charge of the facility. While I agree with the idea of being compassionate, the fact that they even debate whether or not to notify the child's adoptive parents that the woman who tried to kill the child is on the loose seemed horrifically unethical to me.

The comedy stuff? Oof, it mostly didn't work for me. And that's nothing against Bruni Tedeschi, who does a great job portraying a woman who has internalized to the point of instinct the language of the upper class and is able to wield it, like a weapon, in pursuit of what she wants. But the thing about Beatrice is . . . she is terrible. Like, really terrible. There are multiple times where she is overtly racist and homophobic, once singling out a Black family to loudly declare as being "clearly unemployed". "Tee-hee!" the film seems to suggest with the score and framing of these scenes, "What a character!".

There is also some general humor wrung from the other patients at the facility, and this kind of laughing at (not with) people with mental illness just never sits right with me.

If it were possible to cleave the comedy out of this film, I think I would have really enjoyed it. Donatella's story--and even Beatrice's attempts to help on her behalf--is compelling and resolves in a satisfying (if a bit unbelievable) fashion.




That’s the only valid complaint I’ve read about the film.

Here’s my review/analysis if you wanna give it a gander:

https://boxd.it/32Qs7Z
Nice analysis man.

WARNING: "Nope spoilers" spoilers below
In regards to this paragraph "However, they do ultimately destroy this creature and get their shot. It’s ironically a victory for the humans while also perpetuating the exact thing it spends the film criticizing. Perhaps that’s thematically muddled but I think it’s provocative, like Jordan Belfort getting away with his insider trading schemes."
I think it could be showing that it's a cycle that can't be broken, or at least not by our heroes. And that even attempting to simply document something is still contaminating it or in this case outright destroying it.



Nice analysis man.

WARNING: "Nope spoilers" spoilers below
In regards to this paragraph "However, they do ultimately destroy this creature and get their shot. It’s ironically a victory for the humans while also perpetuating the exact thing it spends the film criticizing. Perhaps that’s thematically muddled but I think it’s provocative, like Jordan Belfort getting away with his insider trading schemes."
I think it could be showing that it's a cycle that can't be broken, or at least not by our heroes. And that even attempting to simply document something is still contaminating it or in this case outright destroying it.
WARNING: spoilers below
I think there’s definitely something to it. She uses an antiquated camera, the balloon mirrors Gordy, and once she’s done, everyone else shows up with their cameras like vultures.

The more I think about it, the more I’m certain it’s meant to be a darkly ironic turn where we, the audiences, have become complacent in the exploitation in order to get our spectacle. We probably felt disturbed and upset by Gordy’s death but here we are, wanting to cheer our heroes at the same time because they fed our addiction for spectacle.

And if you’re going to do a commentary on crowd pleasing spectacle that comes at the cost of animal exploitation, what better filmmaker to homage than Spielberg and what better film to mirror than Jaws.





The Bob's Burgers Movie - Long story short, this is basically an extended episode of the show. A three parter if you will. So if you're fond of the show, you'll also love this. I'm a fan and despite some initial misgivings that I quickly got past I enjoyed it. And there were only three musical numbers I had to fast forward through.

For those unfamiliar with the show Bob Belcher is a perpetually struggling restaurateur and runs a quirky small burger business with his family. His wife Linda and children Tina, Gene and Louise. There are innumerable supporting characters, some of whom don't have a chance to appear.

Bob and Linda are having their usual trouble keeping up with their loan on the restaurant equipment and ask the bank for an extension. Who promptly turn them down and instead give them seven days to pay up. With their backs against the wall and facing certain eviction a sinkhole suddenly opens up right outside their front door. The rest of the movie involves them trying to earn enough money while also asking their indifferent landlord Calvin Fischoeder for a break on their rent. In the meantime the kids stumble across a mystery when Louise goes into the sinkhole.

If you follow the show you'll recognize the plot. If you don't follow the show you probably shouldn't or won't be watching this in the first place.

80/100



Ha! One of Hitchcock's very few comedies. It's an enjoyable screwball outing. Carole Lombard had a natural talent for comedy, and R. Montgomery also rose to the occasion. It's not typical Hitchcock for sure, but it does provide a lot of laughs.





Knives of the Avenger, 1966

When her husband, King Arald (Giacomo Rossi Stuart) is missing-presumed-dead, Karin (Elissa Pichelli) and her son must go into hiding. The wicked Ahgen (Fausto Tozzi) wants Karin for himself as part of taking over the kingdom. Fortunately for Karin, a mysterious man named Ator (Cameron Mitchell) rolls into town just in time to defend Karin from Ahgen's clutches.

Looking for stills to include in this review, I can confirm that this movie was filmed in more than one color. But the print I watched (on Tubi) was pretty trashy, and the whole look of it was brown on brown on brown. It's not really fair to ding a movie for having watched a subpar print, but even if the movie had been more colorful and crisp, I don't think that would have solved most of the problems I had with it.

The premise itself is fine, and I really liked the way that it all begins with Karin visiting a woman who can see the future, and who very soon after delivers news of an untimely death to Ahgen and his men.

The middle, though, is kind of a muddle. I read that Bava came in and took over this movie--rewriting and reshooting it. I would say that for the most part, the best thing I can say about this film is that it is workmanlike. You will be familiar with pretty much every beat of the narrative (Karin's initial wariness of Ator; Ator saving Karin from an assault; Ator bonding with Karin's son; etc). There are also a lot of moments that seem stretched out, like someone will be riding a horse and then seconds later . . . they are still riding the horse. Likewise, someone will be walking and seconds later . . . they are still walking. It really messes with the pace of the film and deflates a lot of the tension.

I would have rather seen a clean print, but I think that the main issues with this film were the lackluster story and the weird pacing.




I dig Knives of the Avenger quite a bit. Bava basically blended the peplum and spaghetti western into a knife-slinger revenge narrative with cool action and a simple, effective plot.

It’s not close to Bava’s best but it’s far from his worst too. Plus, I dig seeing a Cameron Mitchell from the “he could still act” era.





Dante's Inferno, 1911

In this adaptation of the famous work, Dante (Salvatore Papa) is escorted through the circles of hell by Virgil (Arturo Pirovano).

Guys, this movie is messed up. I was not ready.

I was not . . . ready.

For the most part, this film serves as a series of tableaus, with Dante and Virgil passing through each level. But those tableaus are really something else. While the mechanics of the effects are very obvious---puppets, people hanging from wires--the artifice just adds to the nightmare quality of it all.

Where the film doesn't slack is in scale. The sets are huge and imposing, and they are filled with writhing, semi-nude extras enduring various torments. From the get-go it paints a picture of an unflinchingly cruel afterlife. There are souls passed by Dante who committed no other crime than having been born before Christ. The torments would have been disturbing anyway, but the way that they use so many extras gives it that extra heft.

Some of the torments walk a line between looking scary and looking silly (such as people whose top halves are buried so that only their kicking legs can be seen), but honestly they really landed for me. Even the costuming intended to give some modesty to the extras ends up backfiring, as from far away their crotch-thong things give the impression of huge erect penises. It's all weird. Things either work on purpose, or their not-working circles around to working again.

The film was also more violent than I was expecting, like a sequence where a man's eyes are burned out with hot tongs (on screen!), or a man is crucified to the ground. I should know better at this point, but for whatever reason I always expect older movies to be a bit tamer, which just adds to the shock at those moments.

I also have to give a shout-out to the score that came with the version I watched. It was performed (live!) by Mike Kiker and I thought that the 80s-inspired sound was a really striking fit for the material.

There are one or two eye-rolling moments here or there. A part where they ride a dragon to another level of hell does just look a bit silly. Taking time to call out that Mohammed has been disemboweled for spreading false gospel. But thankfully these moments are few and far between.

Wowza.




I'm glad to hear this. I thought Us had a lot of positives but was narratively a step down for Peele and some early lukewarm reviews for this have me concerned that he might be a one-trick pony.
The reviews make it seem as though Peele's career is continuing the disminishing returns he's been getting since after Get Out, but I'm going to see it anyway because people keep saying that it provokes a lot of thought, and I haven't been to a theater all month long yet, so this is going to be the one that breaks my dry spell, regardless of my expectations for it.
Plus, I dig seeing a Cameron Mitchell from the “he could still act” era.
Yeah, but his B-movie slumming days still make for some funny content anyway:



I dig Knives of the Avenger quite a bit. Bava basically blended the peplum and spaghetti western into a knife-slinger revenge narrative with cool action and a simple, effective plot.

It’s not close to Bava’s best but it’s far from his worst too. Plus, I dig seeing a Cameron Mitchell from the “he could still act” era.
The acting was definitely better than I expected.

But nothing about it (aside from the oracle woman) felt all that special. It's probably true that the lackluster print I saw took some of the edge off of the action sequences.



The acting was definitely better than I expected.

But nothing about it (aside from the oracle woman) felt all that special. It's probably true that the lackluster print I saw took some of the edge off of the action sequences.
I think like all Bava, better transfers can make all the difference. I also think it helps to compare it to other contemporaneous Viking/sword and sandal type flicks. It’s Spaghetti Western sensibilities for character and action certainly make it stand out in my eyes, as the genre is rife with stale, poorly choreographed sword fights and melodrama. This one is just so wonderfully straightforward and stylish that it caught me by surprise.

Have you watched Bava’s remake/ripoff of The Vikings, Erik the Conqueror?



Have you watched Bava’s remake/ripoff of The Vikings, Erik the Conqueror?
Yes, I have! And I enjoyed it.

If I come across a better print of Knives of the Avenger I might give it another watch. For me it lacked narrative charge, but I'll admit that more impact from the action sequences would have made a difference.



Yes, I have! And I enjoyed it.

If I come across a better print of Knives of the Avenger I might give it another watch. For me it lacked narrative charge, but I'll admit that more impact from the action sequences would have made a difference.
There’s a pretty solid Kino Lorber release so it may end up on Kanopy.



I forgot the opening line.

By May be found at the following website: IMDb, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=64959535

Paris is Burning - (1990)

Documentaries work best if you hardly know anything about the subject they're about to regale you with, and I knew nothing about the New York gay ball culture of this time period. I wonder if it still persists to this day? Those interviewed seemed to feel excited and liberated to be able to find a world-wide audience and explain to them the reasons they do what they do. There was a feeling of change in the air - of not complete acceptance for who these people were, but at least a level of acceptance which was much greater than in all past eras. I felt like I had some understanding for the way they felt - their need for validation, attention and acceptance. It's a subject I wouldn't want to say too much about, due to my ignorance, so I'll just say that I found the documentary fascinating and very joyous.

8/10


Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=4339779

A Prairie Home Companion - (2006)

I watched this last night - Robert Altman's swansong. I have to say, it was much better than I thought it was going to be - a very warm and touching film which has it's share of funny moments. It was nice to see Kevin Kline in something, somewhat trying to play his part the way Bill Murray would. It's about a long-running radio show during it's last ever broadcast, as the cast and crew sadly go through the motions one last time. Quite fitting. Real-life host and creator of the show (which ran from 1974 up until recently) Garrison Keillor appears as himself. There are a host of stars in it, from Meryl Streep to John C. Reilly, Woody Harrelson, Lily Tomlin and Virginia Madsen. It has a lot of charm and a laid back, easy-going atmosphere.

7/10
__________________
Remember - everything has an ending except hope, and sausages - they have two.
We miss you Takoma

Latest Review : Le Circle Rouge (1970)



Paradox (2016)



A low-budget sci-fi with a high entertainment value. The second part literally dragged me into the movie's world. There were subpar scenes here and there, but broadly speaking, this film was very well done. Imaginative works pertaining to the theme of time travel are a real treat for me, if intriguingly done; and I'm exceedingly glad that this flick was one of them. 8/10



Victim of The Night

By May be found at the following website: IMDb, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=64959535

Paris is Burning - (1990)

Documentaries work best if you hardly know anything about the subject they're about to regale you with, and I knew nothing about the New York gay ball culture of this time period. I wonder if it still persists to this day? Those interviewed seemed to feel excited and liberated to be able to find a world-wide audience and explain to them the reasons they do what they do. There was a feeling of change in the air - of not complete acceptance for who these people were, but at least a level of acceptance which was much greater than in all past eras. I felt like I had some understanding for the way they felt - their need for validation, attention and acceptance. It's a subject I wouldn't want to say too much about, due to my ignorance, so I'll just say that I found the documentary fascinating and very joyous.

8/10
Yes! We got another one!