The Movie Trade-off Tab

Tools    





MARATHON MAN



I wont get into a detailed review.
But I have recently tried to acquaint myself with classic thrillers.
& thanks to mark for this suggestion which helped me prioritized this.

I can't speak enough for Dustin Hoffman's acting, this guy never ceases to amaze me.
I can actually say he is now one of my top 5 favourite actors.
Regarding Laurence Olivier, his character has to be one of the most fascinating villains in the history of cinema.

The plot might seem less entertaining & worn-out in recent times, but it still manages to be one of the best cinematic thrillers due to its sheer unpredictable & captivating characters.

Also, the background score is what got my interest the most.

I'd recommend it to most thriller & suspense lovers.




seriously, Jason, i've watched that Astro Physicist clip about three times now and i find it really hysterical. you definitely do NOT have to be gay to find the humor. Netflix has it on Instant Play, so maybe i'll watch it tonight. i could use a good laugh.
I agree I don't think you have to be gay to like it I just have a weird sense of humour

Hope I haven't offended you Sexy
__________________
Health is the greatest gift, contentment the greatest wealth, faithfulness the best relationship.
Buddha



No, you haven't offended me at all. Say, what did you think of Evie's gross boobs? Remember - when she was filming her Speciamercial?



Say, what did you think of Evie's gross boobs? Remember - when she was filming her Speciamercial?
She is such an evil character I thought she was an old man when she was getting out of bed



i'm SUPER GOOD at Jewel karaoke
heh, the first time you see Evie sit up in bed, i thought she was an old woman who had recently had a stroke! really terrible, but still really, really funny.



Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.
Elite Squad (José Padilha, 2007)
- but with strong reservations



At genesis pig's suggestion, I watched the Brazilian thriller Elite Squad, and although I believe the film sends harmful mixed messages, I would have to say that it's well-made and occasionally thoughtful in its presentation of life in the slums of Rio where most of the police are much worse than the criminals and a very small elite squad of "honest cops" believe themselves to be the last stand against utter chaos within the city. The film follows an Elite Squad colonel (Wagner Moura) who feels the need to find a replacement so that he can escape the constant violence of his job and live a more normal domestic life with his wife and their soon-to-be-born son. There are other characters and subplots, but I'd rather talk about the films apparent themes and messages.



Since the film is intense and has action and violence, and it's shot with bright-colored filters and has a loud, danceable soundtrack, I can understand why it's become something of a cult item with the young and downloaders. However, I'm not sure that many of the viewers even understand what it is that they're watching during the film. To boil down the situation in the Rio de Janeiro slums, at least according to the director who is also a documentarian, the regular police are corrupt and allow all manner of criminal activity to thrive in the slums as long as they get their kickbacks. These same police rip off the police department itself and steal carpool supplies and anything else they can get their hands on. The slums are where people make a meager living selling drugs, but the people responsible for the drugs are seen by the Elite Squad to be college-aged students, mostly rich and spoiled. You know, those kids who like to dance, party and smoke a joint. Well, the Elite Squad, which comes across as a self-righteous fascist organization, will come upon one of these parties and shoot and/or torture youths to get the names of drug dealers, lookouts or people holding drugs. All drugs are looked upon equally as worthy of a death sentence by these "special police". Now the fact that this colonel may have a few moral qualms about his job giving death and torture orders doesn't make him come across as any kind of hero, especially when he trains the new group of recruits to do the same things after he's left his position at the top of the elite command.

Some parts of the movie remind me of the training techniques used in the first part of Starship Troopers, another film set in a fascistic South America. There are also echoes of the opening Boot Camp scenes in Full Metal Jacket where the soldiers are trained to become inhuman killing machines. I'm not really sure what to think the actual message of the film is, but I suppose people should watch it and decide for themselves. I realize that there is already a sequel, so that may help clarify things, but this post is strictly about the first film. It is highly watchable even if there's nothing terribly new or breakthrough about the story of police corruption except for the setting and language. It's not really all that far away from Serpico in many ways except that Serpico's choices really impacted his own life and safety.
__________________
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts. - John Wooden
My IMDb page



I just watched Serpico two nights ago and I intended on reviewing it but decided not to yet since I found the movie mostly dull and boring enough that I couldn't focus/understand. So I need to do a rewatch, at least of certain scenes. 'Cause as of now, Serpico gets only
from me. I loved the beginning though, I thought the first act was wonderful, but then it melted away on me like an ice cream cone in 110 degree weather. Al Pacino's bizarre looks kept getting worse - he went from hot to not.



Brazil (1985) Terry Gilliam


First off, I rented the Love Conquers All Criterion version of the film, mainly because that was all I could find. Is this the version Gilliam intended or, no? I was a bit confused about which version I should watch.

Anyway, Terry Gilliam is a director I haven't paid much attention to even though I have wanted to see a handful of his films just because of how many people have recommended them to me. Now, I had to watch this film twice for two reasons 1) I had no idea what to expect, I didn't read any synopsis or anything, I have always just heard that Brazil is a really damn good movie and 2) I wasn't aware of Terry Gilliam's style. I didn't realize that this was supposed to be so satirical, my expectations were that this movie was going to be a deadly serious science fiction film. I continued wondering as the film carried on why I was laughing so much, and I began feeling guilty for laughing at such a serious film.


This is the worst case of false expectations leading me astray I have ever experienced. I assumed after seeing Lowry's mother with her face streched out, the dreams of Lowry and his angel goddess, the midget doctor with a monocle and top hat, the crazy following of his new boss at information retrieval, that this had to be some weird Lynchian dream world. What was happening somehow wasn't going to be real. I kept waiting for that weird turn of events that explained all the strange things I was seeing. Well, obviously I eventually realized that my expectations were completely wrong. I ended up pausing the movie to read a quick synopsis about the film just so I could get back on track. So needless to say, after the first viewing I was quite confused.

Now, after the second viewing, I absolutely loved this movie. I don't know what that says about me, that I needed a second viewing to understand what was going on, but I did. All the chaotic pacing made much more sense, and I felt justified in laughing so much. This is much more Orwellian than Lynchian.


Overall, Brazil has some great governmental satire as we are along for the fast paced ride following Sam Lowry sorting through a bureaucratic mess, a mess that is never really explained, just experienced. The humor mixes really well despite such a dismal world everyone is living in. Robert De Niro as Harry Tuttle was absolutely golden, he was cracking me up as the non conformist heating duct specialist that swings from building to building on a rope and travels around in a tactical bodysuit filled with heating duct tools and firearms.


So, I was really glad to watch this film despite the wacky pre impression that really threw me off during my fist viewing. I feel like with this film, if you don't know what it is about, at least read about the plot before you pop the movie in.

Thanks for the recommendation Ash, it was a fun experience.

__________________
If I had a dollar for every existential crisis I've ever had, does money really even matter?



i'm SUPER GOOD at Jewel karaoke
oh, wow! it sounds like this film took you on quite an adventure, fiscal. i'm glad you enjoyed it. i was 99% certain you would, because, well, how could you not?

i'm not sure what the Love Conquers All version is. but i do know that there are two different endings of the film. in one version, the end just cuts off a few minutes earlier. the original, full ending is better, though.



Welcome to the human race...
Body Heat (Kasdan, 1981)

Eh. I already knew how it ended and how the plot would've run anyway (it was like a certain 40s classic that I won't name to save spoiling it for others). The DVD kept skipping for the last 15 minutes as well - good thing I knew how it ended, I guess. Performances were decent and the score was pretty good but yeah, not too much to recommend about this other than a 1980s take on old-school noir films.




I like Body Heat. I thought it was a lot of fun and I thought William Hurt was hot in it. I'd probably give it
.



Keep on Rockin in the Free World


The Third Man (1949)



I understand the selection is considered a masterpiece, but i don't see it. I'm not sure how to review this film without dropping spoilers, however i will say that I am glad i watched it so i know where mofo member Harry Lime got his moniker.

The camera angles got on my nerves a bit, and really i think if i saw this movie back in its time i'd like it a whole lot more.
__________________
"The greatest danger for most of us is not that our aim is too high and we miss it, but that it is too low and we reach it." - Michelangelo.



Little Big Man
(directed by Arthur Penn, 1970)



*** The Great Spirit told Mark F to tell me to watch this. ***

Little Big Man scared me half to death when it began because I thought the old, scary Grandpa from The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974) had been cast in this movie. It was actually, I guess, Dustin Hoffman in a ton of makeup portraying his character, Jack Crabb, AKA "Little Big Man", at 121 years old and it is here that he begins recounting his life to a historian.

Following the death of his parents from a wagon train massacre, young Jack and his sister Caroline are found and saved by a Cheyenne Indian and taken back to their village. Caroline fears rape, but alas, it takes the Indians awhile to figure out she's a woman because she's so damned ugly. She escapes them anyway and later we meet up with her again when she's turned into a possible lesbian gunslinger. But Jack gets raised by the Cheyenne Indians and becomes one of them. He gets especially close to the leader, whom he calls Grandfather, and this character follows him throughout the whole movie, although Jack doesn't always hang out with the Indians. Things happen and at times he's getting bathed by Faye Dunaway as Louise Pendry, or he's acting tough with Wild Bill Hickok, or he's traveling around with a snake oil salesman or he's working for General George Armstrong Custer, who becomes a big enemy of his.

The real heart and soul of the movie, though, is with the Cheyenne Indians and it is especially brought to life thanks to the Grandfather character, played by Chief Dan George. I tell ya, this movie made me hate white people. Yes -- and I am white myself. I turned racist against my own people. We are so bad. We kill and kill and kill. We don't believe anything is alive. We want everything dead. That's what Grandfather says and lemme tell ya, I believe Grandfather.

The Cheyenne Indians were also funny because they practice polygamy and they are very accepting of flamboyantly gay Indians among them -- which didn't surprise me, I remember hearing about that in Transamerica. There's a great scene in which Dustin Hoffman goes from Indian Woman to Indian Woman to impregnate them since the white man had killed their kids from other men. We get to see Dustin Hoffman's ass while he's dressed in Indian clothes -- I got a new fantasy out of that scene.

But let's get down to business - what did I really think of it? Well, I thought it was a spellbinding movie. Although, there were times when the spell almost slipped -- but things soon picked up. The first hour of the movie had my least favorite parts -- mainly when Little Big Man was living in the white world and having all kinds of crazy experiences there, like marrying a fussy Swedish woman named Olga that likes sleeping. The second hour of the movie was a lot better and really sealed the deal for the rating I will bestow upon this movie:



The Cheyenne Indian scenes really gave this movie a lot of power. I'm glad they weren't underused, I'm glad he kept finding them and I'm glad they didn't kill off Grandfather early and that he managed to stick around for the whole film. This is a very amusing and very heartfelt film and Dustin Hoffman does some terrific acting, as usual. I had never heard of this film before until recently and I'm glad that Mark F recommended it to me -- too bad the movie I gave him to watch is gonna give him nightmares. But, what can you do? We live for The Great Spirit.



The Bridge On The River Kwai (1957, Lean)


There's a lot to like here. What I like first and foremost is that the narrative standard is not disturbed by the scale of this epic film. This isn't the case in, for example, Gladiator. Yes, that film is quite spectacular, but there's not a lot of meat to the story and the characters aren't developed very well. This isn't the case at all in The Bridge On The River Kwai, where I found the most interesting feature to be the character development of Nicholson (Alec Guinness) and Saito (Sessue Hayakawa) and the mental struggle they fight for command over the British prisoners of war. Both men are so perched in their personal visions on honor and national pride that they will never understand each other. Eventually, they are both dancing on a tight rope, Nicholson going through great physical distress whereas Saito goes through great mental distress, as he struggles to come to grips with the stubornness of Nicholson which he cannot understand from his cultural perspective.

That struggle for command is the most thing about The Bridge On The River Kwai. Next to that there's also the moral dilemma that Nicholson faces. He is essentially helping the enemy, meaning he is committing an act of collaboration. When the medic confronts him with this, he tries to justify his actions by claiming that the work on the bridge is good for the men's morale. Moreover, he claims that his men are doing it out of their own free will, meaning that the Japenese couldn't break their bodies nor their spirits. And it is a pesky situation that Nicholson is in. In order to help his own men, he has to help his enemies. That's the madness of war, upside down.


Also there to be admired are the images and compositions of the scenes. It all seems a bit low-key, as there are no sudden camera movements or flashy editing techniques, but the composition of some shots are just top notch in my book. The scenes where the men are called in front of Saito are beautifully shot. In the background, you can see the under-officers hesitantly looking at each other. On the foreground, the proud Nicholson stands in confrontation with Saito, who elevates himself above the prisoners whenever he can. This composition adds to the drama of the sequence, as the under-officers are looking at the two commanders, whilst these are looking at each other, knowing that others are looking at them, so they must behave accordingly to their position.

I do have some criticism. I don't think the story line with William Holden works that well, perhaps because it's much more traditional as opposed to the mental struggle that Nicholson and Saito are fighting.

Still, this is a bloody good war film with splendid all-around acting, a compelling plot, beautiful imagery, excellent dialogue (good show!) and a nice soundtrack.




Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.
... and one of the most-realistic, spectacular finales in film history.


For Sexy, I'm happy that you liked Little Big Man so much. Some others I've recommended it too seem to find shortcomings in it which I cannot understand. This means nothing to anybody but since I just remembered it, I'll mention it here because Holden rarely seems around anymore. Little Big Man is the number one film of 1970 for both Holds and me, and there were some great films in 1970.