The MoFo Top 100 Film Noir Countdown

→ in
Tools    





THE HITCH-HIKER
(1953, Lupino)



"You haven't got a chance. You haven't got a thing except that gun! You'd better hang onto it because without it, you're finished!"

When was the last time that anyone of you picked a hitch-hiker? A practice that used to be common in the first half of the 20th century started to decline as the century entered its second half. We see someone on the street with his/her hand out and we just speed by them and look the other way. The reasons? Some people might say a lack of trust of strangers, which in turn might've been sparked by films like this... or The Texas Chain Saw Massacre... or The Hitcher.

The Hitch-Hiker follows a pair of fishing friends (Edmond O'Brien and Frank Lovejoy) who pick up a mysterious hitch-hiker (William Talman) on their way to Mexico. The hitch-hiker, called Emmett Myers, turns out to be a psychopath and a killer. Myers, who is running from the law, forces the friends to drive him to Santa Rosalia, Mexico. But on the meantime, he gets off terrorizing them.

One of the film's biggest assets is Talman's performance as Myers. He is a truly menacing and terrifying figure, not because of his physique, but because you actually believe the guy is crazy, thanks to a devilish half-smirk and his lost eyes. Add to that director Ida Lupino's wonderful direction, particularly in Myers' first scene and you will probably lose the desire to pick up any hitch-hiker. Both O'Brien and Lovejoy are pretty good as well as the two friends that try to stay strong, but slowly unravel during their trip.

At 71 minutes, The Hitch-Hiker is a fairly short and simple film that doesn't overstay its welcome. There are some brief interruptions to see how the American and Mexican police deal with Myers' manhunt that break the momentum a bit, but not too much. Through most of its duration, the film is as tense as it gets. Realizing that it is all based on a real-life killer (Billy Cook), might just get you all more tense and more against hitch-hiking.

Grade:
__________________
Check out my podcast: The Movie Loot!



...and my review of The Hitch-Hiker, which I wrote back when I first saw it in 2017. I also think the one that recommended it to me was @Rockatansky back at the RT Forums or at The Bronze.



Society ennobler, last seen in Medici's Florence
#68. Spellbound (1945) is my second hit so far, getting five of its points landing at #21 on my ballot.

Some issues again, mostly regarding Gregory Peck's acting and the made-up ending. Anyway, the general idea was good enough to hold my interest.


-----

My Ballot

...
21. Spellbound (1945) [#68]
22.
23. Woman on the Run (1950) [#91]
...


-----
__________________
"Population don't imitate art, population imitate bad television." W.A.
"You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus." M.T.



And then there was one.


0/34 😰


Almost watched Spellbound, but I found out the twists first and thought they were pretty ridiculous, so I watched Suspicion (1941) instead.



And then there was one.


0/34 😰


Almost watched Spellbound, but I found out the twists first and thought they were pretty ridiculous, so I watched Suspicion (1941) instead.
Are you the last one at 0/34 Stillmellow? Maybe tomorrow? Stay tuned



Spellbound is my #23. I don't really think of it as noir but it was on a list I used to jog my memory. I haven't seen The Hitch-hiker but just looking at the stills it looks more noirish than Spellbound.. Was this remade with Rutger Hauer?



Two that are just okay for me. I really like the concept of Spellbound, but it didn’t quite live up to that for me.
__________________
Letterboxd



Funny that both Countdowns had a Hall of Fame film in them today! I saw Spellbound in the 3rd Noir HoF, and said this at the time:


Spellbound (1945)
Directed by: Alfred Hitchcock
Starring: Ingrid Bergman, Gregory Peck, Michael Chekhov

Spellbound is a film that requires some suspension of disbelief, since the science its plot depends upon has become less and less credible over the years. I still found it thoroughly enjoyable, but I can imagine it being an obstacle to certain audiences. As one would expect from Hitchcock, many shots are brilliantly framed, and the cinematography helps builds tension in many scenes. I've seen some criticisms online regarding Peck's performance, which surprised me because I quite enjoyed him in this. I thought he had great chemistry with Bergman, which given their alleged affair during filming, was likely authentic. Bergman was undeniably the real star though, and she carries much of the film on her own.

I personally think that Salvador Dalí is incredibly overrated as an artist. While I'm not a fan of surrealist paintings in general, I find his work to be particularly unappealing. However for some reason I absolutely love his contributions to this film. That dream sequence is simply fantastic, with initially startling imagery that becomes more bleak and angular as it continues. Every second of it was a treat to watch. It's very restrained in comparison to Dalí's paintings, but still strange enough to be intriguing. The black and white photography gives it a very clean look as well, and makes me wonder if I'd like his artwork more if the colours were different.

While I found the music to be quite effective overall, it was often far too loud and infringed upon the scenes rather than enhancing them. I'm not sure if that was a deliberate choice during production, or if I just didn't like the audio mixing on this particular release. I often have similar problems with the sound in older films, so it's probably just me. This restoration also included an extended overture that I almost couldn't sit through, though I'm not going to hold that against the film since those openings were typically intended for a theatrical setting anyway, and not the home viewing experience.
It wasn't on my list, but I'm glad to see it make the Countdown since that dream sequence alone is worth celebrating.

Seen: 11/34

My List: 4
03. Stranger on the Third Floor (1940) - #92
08. Ministry of Fear (1944) - #75
11. This Gun for Hire (1942) - #78
19. Phantom Lady (1944) - #69



Spellbound is my #23. I don't really think of it as noir but it was on a list I used to jog my memory. I haven't seen The Hitch-hiker but just looking at the stills it looks more noirish than Spellbound.. Was this remade with Rutger Hauer?
Rutger Hauer did The Hitcher in the 1980s, but I don't think it's the same story.



1 for 2. Spellbound was one that I never quite got around to watching when I went on a much needed Hitchcock binge a couple of years back. I really liked The Hitch-Hiker and especially Talman's performance. Neither made my list.

12 of 34 seen.



I can't specifically remember Spellbound but I know I've seen it. I used to love all Hitchcock but have soured on many of them in recent years.

I gave Hitch-Hiker
back in 2016



Are you the last one at 0/34 Stillmellow? Maybe tomorrow? Stay tuned<img src="/community/images/smilies/smile.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Smilie" smilieid="1" class="inlineimg" />
As far as I know. Scarletlion has 2, and both Thief and Sedai have 3.



For whatever reason (it was years ago) I didn't care for The Hitch-Hiker. Spellbound is mid tier Hitchcock. I think CR asked if any other Hitchcock films will make the cut...I think he'll probably win it with at least five but we'll see.
__________________
"Don't be so gloomy. After all it's not that awful. Like the fella says, in Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love - they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock."



As far as I know. Scarletlion has 2, and both Thief and Sedai have 3.
I had two, but got both of today's so I'm at 4.



For whatever reason (it was years ago) I didn't care for The Hitch-Hiker. Spellbound is mid tier Hitchcock. I think CR asked if any other Hitchcock films will make the cut...I think he'll probably win it with at least five but we'll see.
I don't know how many are eligible, but Hitchcock made a whooping 24 films during that period so he's bound to get a couple more. Notorious, Shadow of a Doubt, and probably Rebecca should be shoe-ins.



I saw Spellbound many years ago and enjoyed it. A re-watch is in order definitely. But like several MoFos, I don't really consider it noir, but mystery/suspense, which is apropos given that Hitchcock is the "Master of...", well, you know.

The Hitch-Hiker has long been on my radar but somehow, incredibly, I still haven't gotten to it! It's placing on the list, which I knew was coming, just makes me want to see it more.
EDIT: I remembered that Ida Lupino did another noir that I liked which was Women's Prison (1955). She was the evil warden of the prison of the title. This also stars Jan Sterling, Audrey Totter, and Lupino's husband, Howard Duff. Wonder if it will show up?


No placements today.

#15 He Walked By Night List Proper #88
#22 This Gun For Hire List Proper #78
__________________
"Miss Jean Louise, Mr. Arthur Radley."



Spellbound (1945)

Directed by Alfred Hitchcock from a screenplay by Ben Hecht and Angus MacPhail, this is more of a psychological thriller
film more so than a noir. Rather than a detective, we have a psychoanalyst, while the early protagonists are not who or what that they appear to be.

The main characters are Gregory Peck, who plays the young newly installed head of a mental hospital, and Ingrid Bergman who shines as a prominent psychiatrist on staff. The inimitable Leo G. Carroll plays the previous head of the hospital who had been forced into retirement. Michael Chekhov (of the Chekhov acting method) plays Bergman’s teacher and mentor.

Bergman notices some peculiar behavior by Peck, and suggests psychoanalysis. During his analysis some shocking truths come out which set up a series of criminal discoveries, escape, further revelations, and death. Naturally Peck and Bergman are drawn to each other, which attraction flows to a romantic ending.

Mention must be made of the superb dream sequences authored by the surrealist artist Salvador Dali. They remain as some of the only video work by Dali in film. The sequences constructed by Dali and Hitchcock were reportedly initially 20 minutes in length, but producer David O. Selznick didn’t approve, and had them cut to roughly 2 minutes. This unfortunate deletion resulted in the loss of that valuable footage, remaining only in some photographic stills.

The score went to Miklos Rozsa when his normal collaborator, Bernard Herrmann was busy with other projects. The music featured the novel use of the theramin to underpin the weird scenes. Rozsa has used it once before to great effect in
The Lost Weekend earlier in 1945.

Spellbound was the final film while under a 7 year contract with Selznick. Hitchcock had directed several films for other studios during that time, notable among them was Suspicion (1941) which was his first American film as both producer and director. Freed from Selznick’s meddling Hitchcock turned out several top pictures which lead into his most productive and memorable 1954-64 era.

Hitchcock characterized the film as, “Just another manhunt story wrapped up in pseudo-psychoanalysis.” Yet
Spellbound is a fine film with an other-worldly feel to it despite its serious themes.



As a director Ida Lupino directed four film noirs: The Hitch-Hiker (1953), Outrage (1950), On Dangerous Ground (1951), The Bigamist (1953).

I've seen all of those except Outrage. The Bigamist is good! On Dangerous Ground not so much. The Hitch-Hiker is good and intense.

As an actress Lupino was in a lot of noirs, I can't even remember them all, High Sierra and They Drive By Night comes to mind. One of my favorite actresses and an excellent director.
I think it's an interesting distinction that Lupino, for The Hitchiker, was the first woman to direct a noir. She was director only in "B" films. She did very nice work, but I prefer her as an actress.

One standout in the otherwise pretty predictable picture is the photography by the great Nicholas Musuraca.