33rd Hall of Fame

Tools    





Has any host ever abused their privileges and given themselves loads of extra time?

(I'm waiting until the countdowns finish, in case anyone is wondering.)
I'll be watching your film next.



God’s Little Acre—Rewatch
This movie feels as if it is trying to be a Tennessee Williams play. This isn’t Baby Doll or The Sweet Bird of Youth. It’s just not working. The beats are all there but they never coalesce into something coherent. I enjoyed this scene and that scene, such as Darlin Jill taunting Pluto while in the bath, Darlin’ Jill seducing the albino and the field hand running off the albino so he doesn’t get caught making love with Darlin’ Jill. In fact, almost anything that centers around Darlin’ Jill is amusing. All these scenes are handled well.
The problem for me comes with Will’s story and his fruitless attempt to re-open the mill by turning on the power. It doesn’t work that way. I am fairly sure Will knows it doesn’t work that way. But he goes ahead and does it and gets shot for his trouble. This charging towards the fruitless is the heart of the story, and everyone is doing it. But I can’t get over the idiocy of Will’s action and his death. The writer is Ben Maddow, who has written a number of excellent movies. The Asphalt Jungle, McCabe and Mrs. Miller, and Johnny Guitar to name a few. But this is not one of them.
The actors are fine. Robert Ryan, Tina Louise and Aldo Ray are all excellent as the lead characters. It was definitely novel seeing Robert Ryan as someone who seems full of joy.
The cinematography and Elmer Bernstein’s score are all fine. It just doesn’t gel.



Beau Travail is a beautifully render retelling of the Billy Budd story by Herman Melville. Instead of men on a shop, we have a troop of French Foreign Legionnaires. The first 45 minutes of the film we are being introduced to the troop, their Sergeant Galoup, Commandant Forestier and their physically demanding life in Djibouti which is in a harsh, desert landscape near the Gulf of Aden. We see the men drill and do what looks like Tai Chi stripped to the waist to Benjamin Britton’s opera Billy Budd. Their physical prowess is amazing. I’m going to assume that the cast were all dancers.
The film goes back and forth in time. You are never quite sure of the timeline. We find that Galoup is very jealous of his relationship with the commandant. A younger soldier, Sentain is praised by the commandant for valor when he saves a man’s life after a helicopter crashes into the gulf. This seems to set Galoup off. He is certain Sentain is up to no good. We never really no why. Sentain is not a francophone so it may be this foreignness that sets Galoup off. Sentain is sent on a punishment hike and gets lost. His compass doesn’t seem to be working. Was the compass trifled with? Does Sentain survive his ordeal? We don’t know. We only know Galoup, a man in his forties, is loosing his raison d’etre. He is drummed out of the legion.
I liked the juxtaposition between the shots filled with the blue waters of the gulf, those with the men in their strange drills and then of the men and the local women at the disco. It was quite beautiful
While watching the film I thought about how so many of us live such a sedentary lifestyle. How many of us feel like strangers in our own land. These men are pushed to great lengths in work that demands no thought only obedience. There is camaraderie and belonging but it seems very fragile.




There Will Be Blood (2007)

I could've loved this movie. Indeed I was engrossed in the first hour of the film, which isn't surprising as I love period piece and historical films. The subject matter of the early days of oil production was fascinating to me and handled well. The sets and location were equally amazing. The wide shot of the vast open scrub land that seemed to stretch to the horizon was breath taking, but why then does Daniel and his son walk further and end up in an area with lots of trees. To sum it up, the first hour had me thinking this would be one of my favorite watches in this HoF...Though the score was annoyingly intrusive and seemed ill suited for the film.

But then in the second half of the film the story starts going 'too big' with just too much going on...which then took me out of the story. I didn't like the way PTA handled the initial confrontation between Eli (Paul Dano) and Daniel (Daniel Day-Lewis). In the movie Eli approaches Daniel on the job site and ask for the $5000 promised to his church as a signing bonus. Daniel instantly goes crazy and beats him. I get that a beating was needed to illustrate the hostility of Daniel and to show the growing tension between him and Eli...especially so that the film can have the payback scene later in the church...But Daniel's character needed more motivation before attacking Eli. There should've been a bit of dialogue with Eli calling Daniel a liar for not paying the $5000. That one extra line would make the beating seem less bombastic.

I did like the aforementioned payback scene in the church, that was plum. Though it was triple dipping using another payback scene at the end of the movie, once again too much. Maybe the worst scene was Daniel talking to his adult son. When he started saying with that accent of his, 'stop flapping your hands and use your jaw', I ust about busted up and laughed. It seemed like I was watching a SNL skit...Too over the top for me to believe and every film I've seen of PTA's is like that, he doesn't know or care to reel himself in and constrain what he's showing. I use to be neutral on PTA but now I'm not a fan.

Attachments
Click image for larger version

Name:	MV5BNTEwMjQwNzcyNl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDYwNjExNA@@._V1_-270036441.jpg
Views:	94
Size:	54.6 KB
ID:	98763  




There Will Be Blood (2007)

I could've loved this movie. Indeed I was engrossed in the first hour of the film, which isn't surprising as I love period piece and historical films. The subject matter of the early days of oil production was fascinating to me and handled well. The sets and location were equally amazing. The wide shot of the vast open scrub land that seemed to stretch to the horizon was breath taking, but why then does Daniel and his son walk further and end up in an area with lots of trees. To sum it up, the first hour had me thinking this would be one of my favorite watches in this HoF...Though the score was annoyingly intrusive and seemed ill suited for the film.

But then in the second half of the film the story starts going 'too big' with just too much going on...which then took me out of the story. I didn't like the way PTA handled the initial confrontation between Eli (Paul Dano) and Daniel (Daniel Day-Lewis). In the movie Eli approaches Daniel on the job site and ask for the $5000 promised to his church as a signing bonus. Daniel instantly goes crazy and beats him. I get that a beating was needed to illustrate the hostility of Daniel and to show the growing tension between him and Eli...especially so that the film can have the payback scene later in the church...But Daniel's character needed more motivation before attacking Eli. There should've been a bit of dialogue with Eli calling Daniel a liar for not paying the $5000. That one extra line would make the beating seem less bombastic.

I did like the aforementioned payback scene in the church, that was plum. Though it was triple dipping using another payback scene at the end of the movie, once again too much. Maybe the worst scene was Daniel talking to his adult son. When he started saying with that accent of his, 'stop flapping your hands and use your jaw', I ust about busted up and laughed. It seemed like I was watching a SNL skit...Too over the top for me to believe and every film I've seen of PTA's is like that, he doesn't know or care to reel himself in and constrain what he's showing. I use to be neutral on PTA but now I'm not a fan.


When it comes to PTA I either love it or...don't. No middle ground for me. There Will Be Blood is in the former and may be my favorite from him.


edit: I will be able to finish the final 2 movies. My GF, aka As You Wish, got the best news we could have hoped for regarding life stuff. Instead of horrible news we got really awful news with a "however..." I guess what we learned is always get a second opinion.



When it comes to PTA I either love it or...don't. No middle ground for me. There Will Be Blood is in the former and may be my favorite from him.
I'm glad someone is around...I swear I've never posted a HoF review and literately no one repped it or at least commented on it. This has been one weird HoF...

Anyway I just wanted to say I've seen these PTA films:
Boogie Nights...I don't remember it but not the best film to watch with one's wife.

Magnolia...drove me crazy. Maybe if I knew the film expression for the type of movies PTA makes then I could relate somehow to them. Example, if I know I'm going to watch a French new wave film I can put my mind into the right mode and not expect a conventionally told story.

There Will Be Blood...This does seem like a conventionally told story, unless I'm missing something and it's suppose to be along the lines of the Coen Bros films?

Phantom Thread...Loved it for the most part but the mushroom stuff was just too over the top for me. To be fair to PTA most all films I seen I complain about the ending being too grandiose.

I would like to see PTA's Punch Drunk Love, who knows maybe that is the film that will make me change me mind.



Boogie Nights is my favorite PTA film and is on a yearly watch schedule. First movie me and my GF watched together was The Cook, the Thief, His Wife and Her Lover. Had to let her know what she's in store for if she's gonna get hooked up with me, so Boogie Nights was tame in comparison. Saw Magnolia on the day it was released and loved it. Absolutely blew me away. Inherent Vice is a hot mess but I love it anyway. Not a fan of Phantom Thread or Punch Drunk Love but I should give Punch Drunk another go. It was really odd from what I remember and wasn't expecting that. Haven't seen Licorice Pizza yet.



Fortunately for me since it's a favorite, Boogie Nights is also one of my wife's favorites.

CR, think you might love Licorice Pizza

Hey Fredrick, don't know what you were going through, but I'm happy that it's headed in the right direction



I forgot the opening line.
I use to be neutral on PTA but now I'm not a fan.
But I'm still gonna make you watch every last one of his movies.
__________________
Remember - everything has an ending except hope, and sausages - they have two.
We miss you Takoma

Latest Review : Mona Lisa (1986)



I forgot the opening line.
P.T. Anderson has a pretty polished record for me personally, without any really bad film amongst his oeuvre - ranking them I'd say :

1. There Will Be Blood - One of the greatest films ever made.

2. Phantom Thread - Turns out Daniel Day-Lewis and Anderson make quite the director/actor team-up, because this film is phenomenal.

3. The Master - Joaquin Phoenix and Philip Seymour Hoffman are amazing in this, and I love all the sly digs at L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology.

4. Boogie Nights - The porn industry was very ripe for this kind of satire. Brilliant film.

5. Punch-Drunk Love - It's crazy that one of the most romantic films I've ever seen has Adam Sandler in the leading role. I have to emphasise the word crazy in that statement.

6. Magnolia - Aimee Mann is this movie - a mosaic of a search for happiness in a "random" universe

7. Licorice Pizza - Licorice Pizza is growing on me - I think it's really good.

8. Inherent Vice - I remember liking this, despite it befuddling me a little

9. Hard Eight - I've only ever seen this once, and despite liking it I can't say Anderson's debut is better than any of his subsequent films.



I tend not to like modern auteur directors. I can't think of any that I do like, unless Woody Allen is considered one. Maybe auteur isn't the right word to describe directors like PTA, Wes Anderson, Terrence Mallick and a few more that I can't think of right now.



...Hey Fredrick, don't know what you were going through, but I'm happy that it's headed in the right direction
I just read what Hey Fredrick edited into his post up above....I'll echo Cricket and say, I wish you and your girlfriend a good outcome.



Let the night air cool you off
Aftersun

some spoilers ahead - alert

I hate to admit it, but I wasn't looking forward to this viewing. Reflecting on this after viewing the film, I couldn't figure out why I don't get excited for films like this that nestle themselves perfectly in the pocket of films that do well with me. It's not all that different than Shoplifters, which is my nomination. Recency bias and the strong emotional reaction I had to Aftersun may affect my vote order, but I will try to avoid that. I am a sucker for films that deal parent/child relationships, specifically the loss of a parent. I think the depiction of Calum is great. It's clear to the audience, but not Sophie, that Calum is depressed. He's putting on a show of strength, he is doing Tai Chi, which is a very performative form of exercise, which is Calum putting on a show of strength for his daughter, shielding her from his brokenness, with physical brokenness representing the harder-to-see depression Calum has. He has a cast but he removes when he is with Sophie, for example. He's not always great at hiding it, but Sophie still can't quite see it, because she's a child. The night Calum doesn't sing Karaoke with Sophie, he runs into the dark ocean in a very harrowing scene. That may not have been a suicide attempt, but I think it clearly is supposed to get our mind on the idea. The actress that played Sophie is great, I think she did wonderful in this film in a very believable role. There were a couple times where she said some things that felt like an adult wrote that for a kid to say. Which is what happens in almost every case of a kid saying lines on a screen, but hopefully you get what I am saying. Specifically the line where she mentions having a great day and afterwards being down. It's a little too profound for an 11 year old to understand, but I think that's nitpicky and the line works in the context of this film. The final scenes tore me up, I had mist in my eyes when Sophie was popping out from behind the walls from the airport because the impending finality of it was hard to take. Great film.



2022 Mofo Fantasy Football Champ
Aftersun



Honestly it's almost a near perfect film for me. The chemistry between Paul Mescal and Frankie Corio is just so genuine. I know they put a lot of hard work into their performances. Over 800 people auditioned for the role of Sophie but I got to say Corio was an excellent pick. The story is told really well too by Charlotte Wells. On the surface it's a simple film but it makes you think about life and how fragile it can be. Overall I love how the film is perceived as a flashback of Sophie. I think we all have times where we look back on important things in our lives. An excellent film.





A Man For All Seasons (1966)

I wasn't bored. And that says alot as I do get bored during some movies. Even movies that I really like, but have seen a number of times can still cause me to be checking the clock way too often. But not with A Man For All Seasons. This was my third viewing and it kept me engaged for the full 2 hours. I even found myself wishing there was a part 2 so that I could see more of what happened to Thomas Cromwell. Well I have seen movies about Cromwell and I just might revisit them as I'm that interested in history especially when it involves palace intrigue and internal politics of England's past.

I liked that this film was a more focused personal story, versus what another director might have turned into a big splasy spectacle. We have big events alright but the story itself is well grounded and told mainly from Thomas More's perspective (Paul Scofield). Scofield was excellent as the man who's religious convictions and utter belief in the word of the law stood his ground...and in doing so lost his head. Robert Shaw (Jaws) makes one helluva colorful Henry the VIII. I like his gold gilt vest in that screenshot, which makes him look like he might be a man of hefty proportions while the actor himself is not sporting visible padding. The King himself was a large man probably from eating too many turkey legs *That's a famous image of him btw.

In top contention for the peak of my ballot.



Just a note for those who liked 'Aftersun'

This is from director Wells' interview notes in an A24 Blog:


"A photograph of my dad and of me—the starting point for this project—each a single shot because photos of us both are in short supply in that pre-selfie era. I am 10 or 11, Sophie’s age in the film. My Dad is 31 or 32, a little younger than I am now. We happen to be in Turkey":



I can barely read or think about this film without welling up. One of the greatest debut films this century.



I forgot the opening line.


Mona Lisa - 1986

Directed by Neil Jordan

Written by Neil Jordan & David Leland

Starring Bob Hoskins, Cathy Tyson, Robbie Coltrane & Michael Caine

The Best Actor category during the 1987 Academy Awards ceremony made for an interesting mix of sentiment and ability. William Hurt was nominated for his role in Children of a Lesser God - he'd won his first Oscar the previous year, appearing in Kiss of the Spider Woman, and was going for back-to-back Academy Awards. Dexter Gordon would normally be expected to show in one of the music/song categories, but a rare acting gig saw him an unlikeliest possible 'Best Actor' recipient. James Woods was being nominated for the first time ever, and was a strong contender for his work in Salvador. Bob Hoskins had risen from obscurity, gaining fame via the extraordinary Dennis Potter serial Pennies From Heaven, and showing his undeniable worth in the classic British crime drama The Long Good Friday in 1980. His rise now saw him on acting's biggest stage, and his performance in Mona Lisa would probably be a shoe-in for a first-up win. There was only one problem - the sentimental tug of the long-denied Paul Newman. Paul Newman, never having won, had lost a staggering 7 nominations in a row - so many that he decided to not even show this time. In a more open field however, there was no stopping him. Hoskins would have to make do with a Golden Globe and a BAFTA - usually sure signs an Oscar is coming. He would never end up winning one.

Hoskins is a great actor - I love him, and apparently he was a very likeable fellow. Always kind to fellow actors, especially if they were just starting out. He's remarkable in Mona Lisa, playing a low-level crook (George) working for underworld kingpins, who has to ferry around high-class hooker Simone (Cathy Tyson). As he spends more time with this woman, day after day, their intemperate, argumentative relationship develops into a firm friendship - and George finds himself falling in love with her. In the meantime he learns much more about what it means to be a prostitute in 1980s London, where violent pimps abuse their charges, drug abuse is common, girls disappear and are generally mistreated. Many of them are virtual slaves, and Simone wants George to help her find someone she was once close with - a fellow working girl. In the meantime, George has run ins with the big boss, Mortwell (Michael Caine) and a pimp called Anderson (Clarke Peters). His only outlet is an eccentric mechanic/entrepreneur/author friend of his, Thomas (Robbie Coltrane). I once knew a Scottish lady who went to acting classes with Robbie Coltrane - I always think of her when I see him.

It was interesting listening to Neil Jordan talk about his initial inspiration regarding the making of Mona Lisa - the seedy prostitution side, and the idea that men often don't have a very deep understanding of what a woman is thinking and feeling. Despite there being a strong friendship between George and Simone, there's a fundamental disconnect when it comes to their meeting of minds, and George isn't cognizant of his vibrant and forceful passenger's reasoning before or after they start getting along. He simply falls in love with her - and falls into the kind of belief many men do when they're with call girls. That they're really making them laugh because they're funny, and making them scream because they really are that good in bed. He ignores her anger and frustration with him because at the end of the day she's still there, in his car - and conversation with her is becoming easier and more free. George has come from a seven year stint in prison, and even aside from that has probably never spent as much time with a woman if you disregard his wife - who now hates him and tries to keep his teenage daughter from seeing him. For George love is easy - but for a long-term prostitute love isn't that simple, or easily recognizable to men.

Apparently (and I've heard this about some sections of New York as well) the red light districts we see in London during Mona Lisa have been cleaned up, and now the likes of the UK's offices of Google are more representative of what you'd see there. Some old cinemas that would show old classic and cult films have all been closed down because the rents are now too exorbitant. It's fun to see the real seedy side of society in this film, although that fun is tempered with a feeling of sadness for the girls we see. Jordan apparently hired a whole host of real-life call girls to appear as extras in the film, or to play very small roles. He says with a hint of sadness that most of them were drug addicts, and that really brings home a lot of what we see in the film. There are echoes of Taxi Driver when George tries to help underage hooker May (Sammi Davis), at first mistaking her for the girl Simone charges him with finding, Cathy (Kate Hardie). These parallels also merge with another inspiration for the film - a newspaper article about a man charged with grievous bodily harm who claimed that he was urged to do what he did to protect girls from their violent pimps. It all blends together really well, and like Taxi Driver, Mona Lisa has a certain timeless feel to it. The issues wrapped up here have been with us as long as civilization has.

I really enjoyed watching this film - as I've been waiting to see it for a while, and have been avoiding any spoilers so I can some in nearly blind, I kind of built up an expectation apropos of the very scant information I'd taken in. It was wider in scope than I thought it would be, and I think Michael Caine's presence was really powerful, despite his limited screen time. I completely believe he's a ruthless gangster - this mid-80s period for him was one in which he was probably in his best form as an actor. Cathy Tyson had a brilliant debut - you couldn't ask much more from her (she was only 20-years-old.) Robbie Coltrane doesn't get much to do, but his side-business selling fake plastic imitation food is really interesting in conjunction with this film's themes of things that aren't real going up for sale - and I loved the tacky green statues of the Virgin Mary. One of my brother's girlfriends once had a statue of Jesus that would turn different colours if you warmed him up in the oven - I kid you not. My whole family were so bemused by this, and it's stuck in my memory - but the time period for this would have been the early 80s, so perhaps that was some kind of fad at the time.

Unfortunately I don't jive with Nat 'King' Cole's singing and songs - but I can't hold this against the movie. I just kind of endured it - I was expecting to hear the song 'Mona Lisa', and it always went through my head when I thought of what this film might be like. Sure enough, we hear it over the opening and closing credits, with the tune coming up several times during the film itself - Hoskins even hums it at one stage if I remember correctly. I had no idea whatsoever that Genesis song 'In Too Deep' was written and performed especially for the Mona Lisa soundtrack - my pop culture trivia knowledge just gained another fact to help me during quiz nights and the like there - I'm no Phil Collins fan either, but he kind of reminds me of Bob Hoskins. Despite the music and score not doing much for me, I can't say that it impaired my enjoyment of the film much at all. It still works inasmuch as it gives the whole atmosphere a sad sheen that lingers over proceedings. Those Nat 'King' Cole songs have that edge of melancholy wistfulness about them, so I can't say that they didn't fit. I simply don't really like the song 'Mona Lisa', apart from the lyrics which read like poetry.

So, overall this was a movie that has really deep emotional layers to it, and I thought it was very good. It's one that (by it's contents, style, meaning and such) I would have loved to have asked my brother, David, if he'd seen. He died way back in '95, so it's likely I'll never know. I like seeing characters who are rough, roguish and even criminal if they display so much emotional vulnerability, as George did in this film. It kind of sets up a duality that can be seen as emblematic of all human beings. I also admired a movie that could explore the way so many men don't understand what women are telling them with their emotions, body language and even words - how there's often a disconnect there, with guys only believing what they want to believe. Living in the world of make-believe that makes their use of prostitution all the more acceptable, because "they enjoyed it too". Swirling around all of this are the hidden parts of ourselves, the games we play, the tricks - like magic acts, which is another theme that repeatedly crops up. This was a very intelligent, thoughtful film that didn't have to sacrifice any of it's narrative power to be that way. It satisfies on many levels.