I actually think a strength of good tv is in well-done "filler". I partly agree with Guapo, in the sense that you should be able to look back on a series and see an overall cohesion, sort of like a serial novel or series of novels.
Film (relative to tv) typically can't really afford to play around too much and waste time exploring tangents, but a tv series is perfect for the kind of fleshed-out subplots and digressive embellishments of its "world" that usually only novels can get away with.
In skilled hands, those seeming "unnecessary" elements actually add greater impact to the themes, central overarching storyline, what the show's really about.
Of course filler is too often used poorly, but if the writers have a long-term vision then filler episodes can be crafted with that in mind, to expand on their ideas. And filler can also be a way to break monotony (not boredom but literally to break an ongoing tone and segue to another), to let them experiment a little with the characters and deepen them.
Film (relative to tv) typically can't really afford to play around too much and waste time exploring tangents, but a tv series is perfect for the kind of fleshed-out subplots and digressive embellishments of its "world" that usually only novels can get away with.
In skilled hands, those seeming "unnecessary" elements actually add greater impact to the themes, central overarching storyline, what the show's really about.
Of course filler is too often used poorly, but if the writers have a long-term vision then filler episodes can be crafted with that in mind, to expand on their ideas. And filler can also be a way to break monotony (not boredom but literally to break an ongoing tone and segue to another), to let them experiment a little with the characters and deepen them.
__________________
#31 on SC's Top 100 Mofos list!!
#31 on SC's Top 100 Mofos list!!