+1
The term underrated is such a subjective term. What makes a movie underrated solely depends on who you ask. Critics may like a film overall, such as the recently released The Notebook, but the audiences weren’t entirely bowled over by it. Does that make it underrated? A movie may not make scads of money in the box office, but completely rakes it in with its rentals, like Donnie Darko. Does that make it underrated? Movies may be old and outdated, but had, or still has, a huge cult following like the mesmerizing A Boy and His Dog. Does that make it underrated? Maybe it takes a specific taste to appreciate it like the one I just mentioned, so how can a movie like that be underrated when it wasn’t designed to be for everyone from the get go?
Viewers may love a film, but that depends on the target audience. I personally despise slasher flicks, most of the people I know do as well, so maybe all these bloody gore-fests that we avoid could be called underrated by somebody else who adores that particular genre. Take my pick, for example, of one of the most, at least in my eyes, underrated flicks ever; Doctor Zhivago. Critics were disappointed because David Lean had made such masterpieces as Great Expectations, Lawrence of Arabia, and The Bridge on the River Kwai and just could not see this one as a film that compared to the others. The movie didn’t earn what was expected, didn’t receive as many glowing reviews as the others either, and ask people who have seen some of his others whether or not they have seen this one and it seems that most have not. Yet, millions of lonely housewives, and one angry vet (me), all agree that it most certainly is a masterpiece of the highest order. I love this film. I adore it. If it had breasts I’d suckle them. Doctor Zhivago is an underrated masterpiece, and if any of you haven’t seen it yet, go rent it tonight. It is a beautiful story…a little melodramatic at the end…but perfect in almost every other way.