0
I am 100% with yellowjacket1 on this. I was really surprised at how bad Superman was. The plot was convoluted and poorly explained, and there wasn’t a single arc that made me care about any of the characters. The casting was atrocious, on several levels. Why did they skew so young? The movie is supposed to be set years after Superman 2, but Lois looks like she’s around 22, guess what she has a 5 year old son and just won the Pulitzer Prize, so I guess she started working at the paper around the tender age of 14. Routh looks a little older, but not as old as I think Superman should look, but I am willing to deal with it since Superman might not age the same as humans in Bryan Singers vision of Superman. However I can’t deal with the wooden performance delivered by Routh.
Yes Routh physically fit the typical notion of Superman but he displayed no acting talent, I guess he has no idea how to construct a character. I have read reviews that said Routh was trying to imitate Christopher Reeve, I think that is entirely too generous, I would say that the performance he turned in is more equivalent to him imitating a high school drama student who’s imitating Christopher Reeve. The entire cast seemed fairly wooden, but there are several talented actors in the film so I think the dialog and lack of character development must have made it very difficult for the cast to get their hands around their respective roles. A perfect example of this is Parker Posey, she’s above average to excellent in her entire reel, but she does nothing in this movie, and I don’t think it’s her fault, the story just fails her and most of the other characters.
Overall Superman Returns has a very flat tone to it. It doesn’t have the dark, serious mood of X-Men, and doesn’t make use of humor or moments of levity like Spiderman does, it’s just sort of there for 2.5 hours. Who’s fault is it? Well it pains me to say this because I am a huge fan of his, but it seems like Bryan Singer dropped the ball on this one. The studio gave him free reign on this and threw money at him, so I can’t see how the blame can be passed onto anyone else. This was supposed to be a tent pole for Warner but after all the money they spent its performance is disappointing, and I can assure you that the budget for the sequel will only be in the $125m-$150m range.
On the other side of the coin you have X3, while the story wasn’t equal to that of the prior installments, it was clear and defined. There were production problems from the start, and don’t believe for a second that Singer left because he loves Superman so much, he left because Fox wasn’t letting him spend the money he wanted and Warner’s told him they would let him through money around. Then X3 goes through another director and finally ends up with Ratner. There’s an immediate backlash because most people love talking about what a hack Ratner is. Fox pulls the budget down once again, yet X3 turns out to be a fun movie that turns in a strong B.O. performance, and there’s enough public interest in the franchise to develop both Wolverine and Magneto spinoffs. And if anyone can tell me of a scene in Superman Returns that’s as cool as when Phoenix vaporizes DR. X I am all ears.