Originally Posted by Twain
From what I understand, the MTV series was fairly graphic and yet this movie was PG13. ... They may have taken too much of the hard edge off. Sin City should have been proof that an R can succeed when it's warranted.
Charlize Theron... well, she's beautiful and looks good in all her outfits and she moves well. But she's a big girl and her features are somewhat soft. Not sure that's the right hard edge image for the role. But mentally, I think she's ok for the part. She has an edge and slightly dangerous quality that's believable. She's not all tall good looks and pass the bon bons.
sooo, i saw it! aaand, yes, you're right, they took way too much of the hard edge off.
i agree that theron is beautiful, but yes, per my old comments, she is too tall and too-soft-faced. the most she can accomplish with being "hard" is that she's displeased with you or angry. she can do dangerous, but aeon wasn't just angry with a gun. the hardness of aeon was not simply anger but emotional aloofness - she did not appear to FEEL. that is far scarier than someone who is angry with you. you had to follow aeon's actions to figure out her feelings. theron is so obvious, and of course the plot so trite, that we never doubt how she feels about anything. i'm sorry, you would never have seen Aeon gasp and tussle with her emotions and Trevor like you do in the movie.
i'm not saying theron's acting is bad. i'm simply saying they chose an actress with a certain skillset that could not be applied to the emotional performance required by the character of Aeon. it'd be like having Jennifer Aniston try to play Amelie. Sure, Aniston can try to be youthful, sweet, and girlish. But uh, would she sell it? I think not.
reservoir drought, to your points -
- yes, she should not have been wearing white. this is another example of the director and cinematography being more preoccupied with sleek packaging than the story. no assassin on earth is going to drop into an enemy compound wearing white unless everyone else is wearing white, too.
- yes, in the fight between Sithandra and Aeon, the Real Aeon would have a) struck Sithandra and disappeared immediately with the gun or b) killed Sithandra with the gun without blinking. Movie Aeon had to perform a pretty battle and show us angst about killing off someone she considered a friend. Real Aeon knows better than to trust anyone, let alone a friend.
- gross moments - a) it wasn't dead skin they were medicinal thingies she carried on her person for wounds such as these. if you look closely it's synthetic looking, not dead skin. b) they briefly mention that Monacans take a "pill," through which they communicate. the assumption is that in order to communicate with Sithandra, Aeon was triggering her pill (not scratching her bones - your bones aren't that close to the surface
). Why she needed to dig into her skin is beyond me.
cinemaniac - you are right about nothing special or original. which is the crime, because the very core and content of the Real Aeon Flux is special and original. and the film clearly isn't.
i shall address these burning issues in my review ...