One thing that's always bothered me is that people seem to equate the term "chick flick" with love stories in general. A) This prevents a lot of people from seeing films that they would otherwise enjoy and B), it's just plain incorrect. To me, "chick flick" denotes a movie that focuses more on women characters then on men, that is also shallow in terms of maturity and depth-of-story, and that generally focuses on relationships between men and women. (And this raises another issue: many women are in fact
not fans of chick flicks.) Now I'm sure, reading that last point regarding relationships, some part of you is going to be thinking: "Hypocrite. You just said that there's a difference between chick flicks and love stories." Well yes, I did, but I'm not being a hypocrite. A film can focus on romantic relationships between people without being a love story. Let's see... here's a nice grouping of examples. 1)
The Last of the Mohicans: A love story? Certainly. A chick flick? Absolutely not. 2)
Sex and the City: A love story? No. A chick flick? Most definitely. But, see,
Sex and the City still focuses on romantic relationships. I guess my point here is that a love story requires a certain depth of connection and feeling before it becomes such.
So back to my original point, people equate love stories and chick flicks far too often. Some of you are listing love stories, some of you are listing chick flicks. Speaking from experience, quite a few guys are going to be turned off from a movie the instant it is described as being a chick flick. So basically I'm urging some careful consideration here, on the part of those of us responding to the OP and on the part of the OP him/herself. What is this thread really about? Is it about chick flicks, or is it about love stories? If it's about chick flicks, I don't have any favorites. I cannot stomach them. If it is about loves stories, then I do have a few that I can share.
Love Stories:
1)
The Last of the Mohicans
2)
Gone With the Wind
3)
Lars and the Real Girl
4)
City of God