I can't believe I didn't read this thread in detail beofre! It sure is interesting, hope you don't mind if I go back a little bit and post a thought or three about wars!
Originally posted by Flywaver
As for Vietnam there is no way the US could have won...the ratio was not on their side as the Korea, Russia and China were providing Vietnam with military equipment.
Not true at all. Korea was not in much of a position to assist militarily as it was itself damaged in the war. The reason why the US couldn't have won in Nam was because the Vietnamese were defending themselves from what they saw as an invasion by an aggressor, and the US soldiers were miles away from home...
Originally posted by TWTCommish
I am not claiming invincibility - just that any one country (two in some cases I'm sure) can only take some of us down before we destroy them - IE: we can win any straightforward war.
I have to disagree there. If any one country had the element of surprise or a slight tactical advantage (i.e. Russia during the Cuban Missile Crisis) would be able to inflict more damage on the US before it could retaliate. Cuba was a flashpoint because it gave the USSR an advantage in that it could fire the nukes and destroy many of the US bases and nukes, thereby diminishing the US capability of retaliation...the US of course couldn't allow that.
Originally posted by Flywaver
If the US and even the UN/NATO were the best armies in the world they would have defeated Saddam and Bosnia much faster...today's wars aren't necessarely technological like most thinks; you still need to get your infantry and artillery moving. After such a number of bombs dropped on both Bosnia and Iraq none of them were totally defeated; they both have their same ruling person
Bosnia actually was quite a success for the allied forces, after twelve days of bombing the Serb army retreated. The Dayton peace accord was signed soon after. Bosnia is now controlled by three presidents (one for each ethnic group), and controlled by the US and many other countries under NATO.
As for Saddam, you're right, he did come out as the winner, he is stronger if anything and Iraq did come out as the moral winner. However, with the country in ruins the moral victory is the only thing they have left.
Originally posted by Flywaver
Fair enough, Kosovo was a great victory...
It was a victory in the sense that the Serbian troops retreated from Kosovo...however, it wasn't much of a military victory. It exposed many of the flaws of modern technological warfare - that air power isn't enough to win a war. The NATO alliance came within an inch from cracking as well. And not to forget that they did shoot down a F-117a which was supposed to be "invisible" and managed to damage two more (which crash-landed in Croatia and Macedonia). They were quite smart actually, they had big camouflaged frames in the shape of a tank with a pipe sticking out, a nice way to waste a $1.2 million Tomahawk...A friend of mine is Serbian, so I know a lot about this from him. If anyone's interested, I can go into more detail on what techniques they used to foil the missiles and bombs, but I won't bother for now