Originally Posted by Piddzilla
What about Lost in Translation? And in some respects you could argue that Boys Don't Cry was quite a success for being an indie production: 2 Academy Award nominations ending with one in the bag.
Lost in Translation and Boys Don't Cry are both niche, and they are only two movies, there is no versatility as of yet in the women's director catalogue. I don't care about academy awards, I just care about niches.
Originally Posted by Piddzilla
And I think Adidasss were talking about Hollywood directors, or at least more ore less mainstream directors. You can't really expect a director belonging to something called "Women's Independent Film Movement" to release blockbusters that compete with Spielberg and Bruckheimer. It's not only different niches, it's two completely different worlds.
I don't care about sales, I care about niches and versatility, right now women are grounded in a niche because A. The stories need to be told and B. The people in charge believe that females are the one who needs to tell the story and C. Women have not broken out of their niche as of yet, exceptions? Of course, but their hasn't been a godfather exception.
Originally Posted by Piddzilla
No, but it is widely considered the best movie ever made so it doesn't matter much what you or I think of it. And it's over 30 years old now, and still people view it as one of the best movies ever made. I just thought your demand for female directors having to produce something equal to The Godfather to earn your respect as slightly unfair, to say the least.
The Godfather DOES NOT MATTER, and it does matter what I or you think, personal opinions are better than overrating something. The point of using the Godfather as an example is to show versatility within the amount of movies produced.
Female Directors, including sofia coppola (which is probably the only female director you know of), remain grounded in traditional movies that tell stories about women and their hardships.
I'm not denying that a woman's story shouldn't be told, it should be, and female directors do a great job.
But you cannot name one director that has broken out of the romantic comedy/female drama/female comedy niche. With sparse examples.
Male directors, directly due to them being male in an industry that was pervaded with sexism, can do all the movies listed above, plus a movie about anything else, not just those that are close to their heart.
The godfather of the women's directorial movement will be something that breaks the niche with effective results.
You seem to be hanging over my use of the word godfather, or thinking that I do not believe women can direct, that is not the point of focus.
I'm just trying to state that when a female director breaks her niche role with a very good production, that will end up opening the seal of the niche.
And do not try to argue that women have been as versatile as men, they were only given the ability to direct since the 1980s, realistically, the 1990s. And their are so many tales to tell that they can communicate effectively due to their relationship with the story that one would obviously jump at the chance.
But the breakthrough movie (not ocsars, not money) of the women's directorial movement has not come to show their versatility.
But when that comes, we will begin to regard female directors as we do male directors. Not for doing anything better, but for producing effective works that dismiss their niche.
It hasn't happened, but it will. Those are just the facts.