As in what particular criteria do you use to make the distinction and if there's some consensus to which we should adhere.
Personally, I've gravitated towards the Academy's rule that the 40-minute mark is what separates a short from a feature (the former being under, the latter being over), but I'm just wondering how widely-accepted that particular number is or if there's some conjecture on the matter.
Personally, I've gravitated towards the Academy's rule that the 40-minute mark is what separates a short from a feature (the former being under, the latter being over), but I'm just wondering how widely-accepted that particular number is or if there's some conjecture on the matter.
__________________
Iro's Top 100 Movies v3.0
I really just want you all angry and confused the whole time.