Movie Tab II

Tools    





I just watched Zack and Miri Make a Porno...meh. 2.5/5
__________________
"Don't be so gloomy. After all it's not that awful. Like the fella says, in Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love - they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock."





INKHEART



If the Inkheart still above looks stupid to you, chances are you'll think the whole thing is stupid. That's my warning to all of you in hopes of getting as many people to forever steer clear of this mess. If however you're maybe thinking about taking some kids to the matinee... well don't. Rent a Looney Tunes collection or something. I guess I'll try my best to sum up my mostly negative thoughts about the film into something a little bit more articulate but to be perfectly honest my brain seems to be repressing this afternoon's viewing as we speak. Better write fast.

Apparently, out in the world are people who can bring the things they read aloud into the real world. These people are called, Silvertongues... yeeeeaaahhh. Well, Mo (short for Mortimer, played by Fraser) happens to be a Silvertongue and, the movie kind of skips over this next part, but he seemed to have read Inkheart sometime before most of the film actually takes place. In doing so he let loose many of the characters that had before only existed in the story. They've been living in our world sometime and have been searching for Mo, trying to get him to read for them and call out treasure and monsters and other what-not into the world.

There are only a few cool things about this movie. One: If you're a fan of the British series Peep Show, the actor who plays Super Hands plays a very minor role. I thought it was kinda cool. Two: I kind of liked how they brought some characters from classic stories like Arabian Nights and Peter Pan into the real world. Third and probably last: Andy Serkis plays a half decent villain here. The only actor, in my opinion, who turns in a bearable role.

The rest of the movie is just an absolute mess though. The story is some half baked mythology which was obviously slapped together and there's no rational logic that dictates the fantasy elements here so the whole thing ends up being a utter clutter of moldy butter. None of the actors seem to care either. They all look like they're there to simply collect a paycheck. Brendan Fraser who I enjoyed in the first and third Mummy movies is in cruise control here and Helen Mirren looks like she didn't bother rehearsing for any of her scenes. Paul Bettany who is the last noteworthy actor in the film (his wife does make a brief cameo though ) is merely alright. His character is a fiend but the writers didn't seem to have the heart or the balls to just go ahead and make him a bad guy. Whateva.

The filmmakers should be ashamed of themselves. The shot composition is sloppy. The special effects are barferic. The sets are sub-par. I've seen better ones at Halloween Nights at Universal Studios. The wardrobe is uninspired. Everything about the script needs a touch-up by a writer who knows what they're doing. And well, the movie just all-around sucked.

So in summary, I didn't at all appreciate either the technical or creative aspects of this picture, or the picture as a whole. I gave it that one popcorn for the three reasons I wrote earlier and also because some parts of the film managed by some miracle to be tolerable. Those instances were very short lived though.

Avoid this one at all costs.



I don't know. Inkheart looks alright to me. I like these types of flicks though. In reading some of your reviews I sort of get the feeling you're not really that into fantasy/Sci-fi type flicks.
__________________
We are both the source of the problem and the solution, yet we do not see ourselves in this light...



More high ratings fer u!

Forrest Gump (1994) -




I've seen this movie more times than I can count. It never gets old. It used to be my #1 favorite and dag nabit it's still amazing. I'm sort of sad that the visual effects during the live TV sequences don't look amazingly real anymore like they did during my first viewing, especially with the lips moving, but that's okay. The film is amazing enough and totally existentialist.

Repo! The Genetic Opera (2008) -




This is at least tied with Alien vs. Predator: Requiem as my least favorite film of all-time. In fact, where there was one thing in AVP:R I was happy about (that whore being killed), this had absolutely nothing going for it. The songs/singing was terrible, the acting was disgraceful, and Darren Lynn Bousman is an awful director. I'll take Repo Man over this junk any day.

Groundhog Day (1993) -




I've seen this a bunch as well, but I wanted to revisit it since it has been a while. If I've noticed anything about Groundhog Day it's that the rewatchability is great. I knew everything that was going to happen, but it still felt like new. Maybe because it's been so long since I've seen it but nonetheless. This film was influenced by my favorite book, "Replay" (although in that, the main character replays his whole life over and over again, rather than a single day). I really like that because it's pretty much the only recognition I've seen for "Replay", which is truly an amazing book.



Welcome to the human race...


Joe Versus The Volcano (Shanley, 1990) -
+

So this was on TV late last night and I decided to give it a go based off the fandom of a handful of people on this site. While it wasn't a bad movie, it wasn't exactly an overly great one either. Granted, the storyline and complications were handled well, although I don't really feel like the film's sense of humour really agreed with mine (I get the impression that Joe Versus The Volcano is first and foremost a comedy, yet I have to admit I only chuckled at it about once or twice).

I also find it a little hard to believe this was made by the same person who made Doubt.
__________________
I really just want you all angry and confused the whole time.
Iro's Top 100 Movies v3.0



I don't know. Inkheart looks alright to me. I like these types of flicks though. In reading some of your reviews I sort of get the feeling you're not really that into fantasy/Sci-fi type flicks.
Hey, I thought Inkheart looked alright too. I wouldn't have watched if I didn't think there was at least an outside chance it would be good. Also I've actually been waiting for quite a while now to see a decent fantasy flick hit the big screen. This just turned out to not be that movie. If you end up watching it and hating it be sure to tell me so I can say "See? Told you so".

And you don't have to worry about my super secret agenda where I bash on fantasy and sci-fi films. I think I might just have somewhat high standards for them. In any case, I'll be catching Coraline sometime this week and hope that'll be the flick to satisfy my "fantasy" cravings. I'll probably see Push too, though I doubt that'll do much to sate my hunger for good sci-fi.



Wow, I thought the trailer for Repo! looked hysterical. I think I'm going to see it pretty soon so I hope its as half as good as the trailer. Anthony Stewart Head doing another musical will be sublime. He was terrific during 'Once more with feeling' The Buffy musical episode. I can't wait.

Anyway, I'm behind again and I can't remember all of the flicks I've seen recently. I did see a pretty decent one last night.

Saw 5 (David Hackl-2008)


Most of these flicks agree with me for whatever reason. I like their slick style and I especially enjoy the theme song. I was humming it all day long at work. If they do in fact make 5 more of these I suspect I'll buy them all.

Rise (Sebastian Gutierrez-2007)


Not great, but pretty watchable. Lucy Liu has been a favorite of mine since the Ally McBeal days and she was OK here. For a movie relatively low on special effects I rather enjoyed their take on the vampire world. Even if they stole their feeding method from the far superior The Hunger. Still though I enjoyed most of it.

Stardust (Matthew Vaughn-2007)


I can't remember what I rated this extremely enjoyable flick the last time I saw it but I think I'm in love with this movie a little bit. Such a fun time and a cute little story.

There's a bunch more but I misremember them right now.



Stardust IS an "extremely enjoyable flick". I actually just wrote up a short post yesterday in the "Surprisingly Good" thread about how I was so taken aback by the sweet goodness that was Stardust. Coincidence?



Wow, I thought the trailer for Repo! looked hysterical. I think I'm going to see it pretty soon so I hope its as half as good as the trailer. Anthony Stewart Head doing another musical will be sublime. He was terrific during 'Once more with feeling' The Buffy musical episode. I can't wait.
Seems more people are liking it more than I did.

Yeah I like Giles too. Not much in this film, but I guess he was the best thing about it.



Hey, I thought Inkheart looked alright too. I wouldn't have watched if I didn't think there was at least an outside chance it would be good. Also I've actually been waiting for quite a while now to see a decent fantasy flick hit the big screen. This just turned out to not be that movie. If you end up watching it and hating it be sure to tell me so I can say "See? Told you so".
The longer you hang out here the more you'll see me tab about some truly bizarre and often terrible movies that I find some level of enjoyment in one form or another. I rarely "hate" a movie but if I dislike it intensely I'll let you know. The wife and I are rather big Brendan Fraser fans so we have already sort of decided to enjoy this flick on some level, even if that means this flick is nothing more than one of those "Sci-Fi channel originals" that are usually just terrible. And yet we watch them anyway.


And you don't have to worry about my super secret agenda where I bash on fantasy and sci-fi films. I think I might just have somewhat high standards for them. In any case, I'll be catching Coraline sometime this week and hope that'll be the flick to satisfy my "fantasy" cravings. I'll probably see Push too, though I doubt that'll do much to sate my hunger for good sci-fi.
I haven't heard of Coraline but boy Push looks pretty bad doesn't it? Definitely Sci-Fi channel material there.


Stardust IS an "extremely enjoyable flick". I actually just wrote up a short post yesterday in the "Surprisingly Good" thread about how I was so taken aback by the sweet goodness that was Stardust. Coincidence?
Mayhaps, either way, I like it. I like a lot.



Tropic Thunder -


The last time I watched this was the day it came out on DVD, and I'm not going to lie, I was actually pretty underwhelmed after I got done watching it then. Because of that I thought my love for this was going to go down even farther, I was pretty wrong though. I mean nothings going to come close to when I first saw it in theaters, if you can remember I think my rating was a little over than what it should've been then. Maybe I just wasn't in the mood to watch it the day it came out on DVD, but I sure really liked tonights viewins of it. Even though this is a spoof movie, I have to point out that the very first scene in this, after the fake trailers of course, it one of the most well made war sequences that I've ever seen. I actually think that this could've worked really well as a real war movie, but I'm fine with the direction they chose for it.

Surprisingly enough, the acting is pretty good in this. Robert Downey Jr. stood out the most out of the cast, I've probably already said that before. He just really transforms into his character, I wouldn't be upset if he did take home 'Best Supporting Actor' this year at the oscars, even though I know it's a pretty long shot. Tom Cruise was just plain outrageous in this though, I personally think he was the best choice for that role. Much like Downey Jr., Cruise actually almost seemed to fully transform into his character. I'm not really too big a fan of Jack Black, I've always found him pretty annoying in his roles, Tenacious D And The Pick Of Destiny is the expection. I guess he was okay in this, he definitely wasn't as annoying in this as some of his other movies.

I really loved the music choices for this though, I'm talking about the Vietnam music, not the occasional rap song that played. Rap just isn't good music, I do admit that there is some rap that I like, just not a lot of it. Anyways Vietnam music is like the best kind of music that there is, so of course I love seeing it used in movies. This has one of the best credit scenes though, I mean what's not to love about Tom Cruise doing some hip-hop dance, that was one of my favorite parts of the movie. Cruise on the phone was the absolute best part about this though, I never knew that he could be so freaking funny,

I'm very glad I decided to watch this tonight though, I mean I don't love it as much as I did at one time, but I still really like it. One of my only gripes for this is that there is a few slow scenes that didn't really make me laugh much. A good amount of the movie did make me laugh though, my only thing is that I think it relied too much on Robert Downey Jr. Any comedy fan needs to check this out sometime, it's probably one of the best, if not the best, spoof movie that I've seen so far. I guess that really isn't saying much though, seeing that usually spoof movies are pretty bad.




The Hi-Line -




The only thing missing in this movie...is a point. Lol.

Don't see it or risk brain implosion from boringness. I'm quite surprised I watched it all the way through.

Man on Fire -




Probably my favorite "vengeance/revenge" movie I've ever seen. It's been quite a while since watched it last, so I wanted to reconfirm my liking of it. And tonight, I did that. Awesome movie; I nearly cried at the end.

Midnight Crossing -




Some decent action and a couple of pretty clever twists, but for the most part this movie seemed rather dull and its plot just kind of went from one place to the next without much motivation.

Eight Days a Week -




I found Eight Days a Week pretty enjoyable. Although not a whole lot really happened in it (the entire movie was this kid standing outside this girl's window in an attempt to make her fall in love with him), some pretty interesting things were presented. It reminded me of The 'Burbs in that the film takes place in a suburban neighborhood and the main character and his friend witness a lot of seemingly strange things going on between their neighbors.
__________________
"The mind is its own place, and in itself
Can make a Heaven of Hell, a Hell of Heaven."
John Milton, Paradise Lost

My Movie Review Thread | My Top 100



the family that preys 4.5/5
i have to give tyler perry a good rating on this one in particular because i think it was a stretch for him. his comfort zone is definitely to convert the scripts of his successful plays into movies (other than Daddy's Girls, which I think was an original movie script), so its nice to see his stretching out of the norm, and taking on projects beyond the scope of theater. another breather was the new storyline - similar in the "family problems" way, but its nice to see the he understands that women, too, have issues. Always great to see Taraji Henson and Rockmond Dunbar as well!

babylon A.D. 4.5/5
i actually very much enjoyed this movie, and i think vin diesel was so much more in his element as ....well, as a thug. i know this has been around in other format, but I have never been interested in the storyline before. after watching this flick, i considered the story interesting enough to potentially check out. this movie wins hands down over Children of Men, and before you laugh at that one, consider that if you lay them side by side and strip all the religious fervor and the clime away from both movies, you have the exact same movie: A man, a bad man, takes charge of a "special" young girl that powerful forces in the world want for their own nefarious purposes. The man does not know why, but in the process becomes aware of the girl's special purpose. He then refuses to complete his original mission, and takes on the role of protector and does/almost loses his life in the process of saving the girl child. the only real difference is the ending - one good, one bad, depending on how you define good/bad.

max payne 5/5
i know everyone always hates a little on marky mark from the funky bunch, but the guy will always be cool with me. im not really expecting him to win an oscar, or to do anything to different than brawl. so when you give marky mark in a good old knock down drag out brawling flick, I feel right at home! and since that's all I was looking for from max payne, I was not disappointed. in fact, Id go so far as to say that they did an EXCELLENT job capturing and conveying the depressing, horrifying and slightly psychotic atmosphere of the game.

ghost town. 3/5
ricky gervais is to me like a strong drink. potent with an aftertaste, and the jury's still out on whether you like it or not. gervais is good at what he does, but he's going to take some getting used to for me. I like that they didnt even try to soft pedal his offensive character. Greg Kinnear and Tea Leoni were awesome, as always, and the movie overall, was a nice concept. As a romantic comedy - a nice spin off from the norm.

goin south 5/5
jack nicholson always gets a 5 star rating from me. i had seen this flick, but one of my sisters hadnt, so instead of explaining it, I got it for her. CLASSIC Jack, and if you havent seen it - do! I learned as well that it was Mary Steenburgens first movie role (apparently jack directed this one too?) wow.

resident evil: degeneration 3/5
the CGI movie was so much like playing the game it was uncanny. the guy in blockbuster warned me though that as a fan of the games, Id have issues, though he didnt say what they were. No wonder. Is it me, or did they totally BASTARDIZE the storyline? WilPharma? huh? Then again, I havent played past RE: Outbreak, so what can I say? Maybe RE4 did move beyond Umbrella.

appaloosa 3.9/5
ok, i had misgivings about this film, but it had Viggo in it. plus, you gotta give Ed Harris a chance at a starring role. i cant say I was....too enthused about it, and I think Renee Zellwegger has really come down, but all in all, an interesting storyline. Im not sure if its just me, and I really hope this is not an insensitive statement (i dont mean it to be) but there really were moments there where i was wondering if they were trying to convey an older man in-the-closet version of brokeback mountain. it was quite odd. on the surface, though, i think it was an interesting character/relationship study.
__________________
something witty goes here......



Welcome to the human race...


All About Eve (Mankiewicz, 1950) -


You've got to love a classic like this. Based around the goings-on within a group of people whose lives revolve around a passion for stage acting, it's just as powerful as watching a very good play. The players act accordingly and all deliver memorable performances - not just Bette Davis, but also George Sanders and Anne Baxter primarily, especially at the film's climax. It's a classic for a reason, and it still holds up well even now.

(edit)

Man, what you can get done when you can't sleep...



Two Hands (Jordan, 1999) -


Wow. I was surprisingly underwhelmed by this. Two Hands tries to be a smart and edgy '90s crime thriller - revolving around Heath Ledger's young ne'er-do-well who gets roped into a Sydney crime ring and who makes a mistake that lands him in hot water with the bosses. However, the film really does fail on just about every front. Apart from the cringe-inducing Australian accents (which is really a personal thing I can't stand), there's plenty wrong with it. There's the decidedly average plot, poor attempts at humour and emotion, and one very misguided attempt at giving the film a supernatural edge (in the form of a talking corpse whose presence in the film is completely redundant - the prime example of just how redundant is his explaining Ledger's Yin-Yang tattoo by saying, "Something that's good can still have a little bit of bad in it, and something that's bad still has a little bit of good." No sh*t.). On the plus side, Ledger turns in a half-decent performance (despite not being given that much to work with) and Rose Byrne (who plays the story's nominal love interest) is rather easy on the eyes. Other than that, I have nothing to recommend about this film.



Mystery Science Theater 3000: The Movie (Mallon, 1996) -
+

For those who don't know the movie nor the show it's based on, here's the gist of both - Mad scientist Dr. Forrester (Trace Beaulieu) has imprisoned Mike (Michael J. Nelson) on board a satellite in outer space and is forcing him to watch the worst movies ever made in order to find a film that can drive the whole world insane and make it easier for Forrester to take over. However, Mike is kept company by a trio of sentient robots - Gypsy, Servo and Crow. To stave off the insanity brought on by watching horrible movies, Mike, Crow and Servo resort to constantly making wisecracks about the poor quality of the film.

The first time I tabbed this film about three months ago, I actually had given it a bona fide
, I'd enjoyed it so much. This marks my fourth viewing of the film since then and and, as you may have guessed from the rating, it's gone down in my estimation a little. If you read up on the history of the film, you'd learn about the extent to which the film was compromised by studio interference, and this is responsible for a couple of the film's flaws (i.e. the film's surprisingly short 73-minute runtime or cutting down on riffs for the sake of the B-movie's storyline). However, some parts of the film can just be considered flawed ideas to begin with - as with the show there are parts where Mike and the robots take breaks from watching the B-movie and end up doing something else on board the Satellite of Love for a brief period before returning to the B-movie. These scenes (better known among fans as "host segments") quite honestly lack the same amount of humour as the B-movie part (with one possible exception being the scene where Mike crashes the Satellite into the Hubble telescope).



However, the actual B-movie part is still very funny (and it makes me wonder if there are people on here who have seen This Island Earth, the movie that Mike and the bots are forced to watch in MST3K: The Movie) and while I've seen a few episodes of the show since then and the jokes fly faster and looser in the show, the movie is still hilarious on its own. Even though it's not quite as awful as some of the other films that have featured on the show, Mike and the bots still find plenty to mock about This Island Earth - the lantern-jawed leading man, the aliens with oversized foreheads and the same slick white hairdo, the slacks-wearing bug monster...the list goes on. There's too much in there to list completely in a review (and even some I'm still spotting after several viewings) I'm considering putting MST3K: The Movie on my revised Top 100 and I probably will. As a damned funny comedy, as a source of inspiration for seeking out the actual show and getting even more laughs, and there's even one more personal reason I have for loving it (which can wait for another time). Excellent.



The Elephant Man (Lynch, 1980) -


This is a hell of a film to watch when you've been awake and mostly bored all night and start watching at about six in the morning. I wonder if being as tired as I was would've affected the film at all, but I'm pretty sure it couldn't be any more impressive than it already was. Although I don't really feel like it's going to become my favourite Lynch film, I still thought it was pretty good. Lynch's direction is restrained and not quite as indulgent as it is in his other works - a move that helps the film because making The Elephant Man too stylised would've been a bit of a mistake. I thought everything about the film was pretty good (with the possible exception of Merrick's speech patterns - even though he's supposed to have difficulty talking like an ordinary person, that doesn't mean it should be entirely incomprehensible as I felt it was at times). The only other real flaw I felt was that it dragged a bit in places and it could've been cut quite easily. Oh, well. The ending was also rather good, if a bit of a shock.



Blade Runner -


For the longest time I always thought Blade Runner was some movie that was just going to be really complex and hard to understand, I really miss judged it though. It actually pretty simple and very easy to understand, I don't really get how someone would be confused with this. Harrsion Ford seemed like he was perfect for the role of Deckard though, the 1980's were just his time for movies. One of the best things about Blade Runner was just how it was made though, the visuals and lighting set the tone perfectly for the movie. The music also seemed to really fit, it sounded very retro and very 80's, even though the movie took place in the future from now. Actually the movie takes place 10 years from now, they really didn't set it far in the future.

I think that with a rewatch this may get bumped up an extra .5 of a point, it may even get bumped down .5 of a point, hopefully it'll be the former but I can see it being the latter more. I do have to say that this is one of the best Sci-Fi movies that I've seen so far, that may be because I've actually never been a big fan of Sci-Fi movies. These past Sci-Fi movies I've seen, this and Close Encounters Of The Third Kind, are really opening my eyes to the genre and making me want to see some more Sci-Fi movies. I definitely don't think that this is overrated the least bit, and anyone that hasn't had the chance of seeing this yet, even though it seems most people have, you should get to checking this one out sometime.




I am half agony, half hope.
Milk--

I really liked this movie. It was warm and humorous while showing us the life of Harvey Milk on his climb into politics and political activism. I thought Sean Penn was so good, I'm guessing he's the man to beat for the best actor Oscar this year. James Franco and Josh Brolin were very good, also, as Harvey's partner and co-worker respectively. Van Sant moved through the story quickly, and lightly, getting the important points across without preaching.

I wasn't up on the Harvey Milk story, other than to know about the 'twinkie defense' that White's lawyers used to defend him, but I thought Milk's story was interesting and important.

__________________
If God had wanted me otherwise, He would have created me otherwise.

Johann von Goethe





CORALINE



Being a big fan of the original story by Neil Gaiman, I've been looking forward to this one for months. Usually I dread watching film adaptations of books I enjoyed but I was so impressed by the previews leading up to the release that I decided to just go with the flow for this one.

The story remains perfectly loyal to the book in its premise. The few changes that have been made to the story as a whole actually serve to flesh out and improve on many things that were lacking in the original source material which is really just a novella, not very long at all. Coraline is a young girl like many girls in that she's a bit spoiled and doesn't care for the people around her as much as she should. Luckily after her family has moved into a new home she discovers a portal into a parallel world where the elements of her life which she found so unsatisfactory have been altered to her liking. As she spends more time in this newly found paradise she finds herself learning a very valuable lesson as the dream world twists into her worst nightmare.

It's a great, entertaining story reminiscent of works like Alice in Wonderland and Spirited Away where a a young, discontent (and female!) character wishes for more without knowing that "more" is not what she want at all. The worlds created in those two films actually don't feel too much different in terms of vibe from the one Coraline stumbles into when she walks through the little door in her living room. Hmm. The moral of the story is clear enough for a young child to understand but I'd say that this movie is probably too much for them. I watched Coraline in a packed theater with a few families with kids and some of them were clearly a bit freaked out by the show. Hell, my date and I were a bit freaked out. The story's quick turn towards the macabre and its incessantly quirky visuals will probably turn off a lot of viewers. The ones that tough it out will be rewarded though.

Probably the greatest achievement of this film when adapting it for the screen was opting for stop-motion animation. I'm about 102% sure that the writer/director Henry Selick (The Nightmare Before Christmas) was responsible for that decision. Stop-motion has made leaps and bounds of progress since the days of Wallace and Gromit and the visuals here are capable of being something wondrous in one scene and downright unsettling in the next. It was a real treat to watch. Now, I saw the movie in 3D and while I'm sure it added something to the experience it certainly didn't make it. The real eye candy here are the wonderful animations and ingenious creations of the art team.

There's a lot of fun to be had with this movie. A few early scenes dragged a bit for me but what followed more than made up the lost ground. Try and catch this one in theaters if you can. Better, catch it in 3D at the theaters.