Movie Tab II

Tools    





I am half agony, half hope.
The Wrestler




Aronofsky's Wrestler was a gritty look at a guy on the downside of a life that wasn't all that great to begin with. Alone, poor, and slightly pitiful, Randy 'The Ram' is making a living scraping by on his former 80s glory as a wrestler. He tries to reclaim his status after his manager makes a match with an old rival.
Randy is a good guy that has lived life by "burning the candle at both ends", and that life has included drugs, alcohol, and wrestling, but has excluded building personal relationships.
I felt tired and worn out watching Mickey Rourke as The Ram. He really embodied the role, and it was awesome to watch. A good story, with fine acting from Rourke and Tomei.
__________________
If God had wanted me otherwise, He would have created me otherwise.

Johann von Goethe



*Sigh* Thanks to Slumdog Millionaire, I'm so utterly confused with my opinions regarding films. This is going to be sort of weird.

Cabaret - I thought this was extremely good. Not my absolute favorite musical, but still the most well-made and important I've seen.

Grease - This is my favorite musical. I have my sisters to thank for that, because when we were younger they would always watch it. I think I would get sucked into it along with them. So it's pretty nostalgic, as well.

Slumdog Millionaire - I don't know what to say, really. It completely messed with my perspective on film. I just want to start with a clean slate (reason I removed my top 10 for now). We'll see what happens.

I also think "extraordinary" fits this film, in my eyes anyway. It was SUCH a big surprise, too, as the film never even looked that good to me. I just decided to see it on impulse.

Now... all last night, I was in a bit of a daze from Slumdog. I don't mean I was lying down for hours just thinking about it, but every film besides it seemed so mediocre and kind of lame. I just felt like watching was some pointless, animated comedy. So I started Surf's Up, and didn't finish it because I was so... out of it. I liked the movie but it wasn't the right time to be watching a movie, I guess. I'll have to finish it tonight.

So today, I went to see Slumdog Millionaire again. Man, what a film. There was some guy near me who would NOT STOP CHEWING HIS GUM and he was completely oblivious to the fact that it was loud and annoying. So the experience wasn't as good as yesterday's. But I still loved the film just as much. Thankfully though, I'm out of that daze and most other films are back to looking more than mediocre.

But I'm still confused with my opinions. It's hard to have a definite top 10 because I'm still seeing a bunch of great movies I've never seen before. And I've seen some damn good ones lately... Midnight Cowboy, Rosemary's Baby, Little Big Man, Million Dollar Baby, Slumdog Millionaire. All of those feel like they should be in my top 10.

I guess I'm just in a little bit of a funk right now. Hopefully I will get out of said funk soon.



Welcome to the human race...


Angel Heart (Parker, 1987) -


This was recommended to me by somebody off another forum who was checking out all of Mickey Rourke's films in the wake of seeing The Wrestler. It was a rather good choice, both as a Rourke film and as a compelling mystery.

Rourke is private eye Harry Angel, who ends up being hired by a mysterious businessman (Robert De Niro) to search for a missing person called Johnny Favourite. Harry's search for the missing Favourite leads him from New York to New Orleans, right into the midst of a handful of brutal murders and the truth behind Favourite's wherabouts.

Angel Heart is actually a surprisingly good mystery thriller. Rourke delivers a great performance as the talkative, neurotic Angel and his scenes with De Niro's smooth, intelligent Cypher are great and just small enough in number to not feel overdone. The way that the tale unfolds is rather interesting, even if most of the exposition occurs in the final 15-20 minutes of the film (but still, what exposition it is, laced with some particularly unnerving editing that only serves to make the twist seem even more shocking). I would recommend this to anyone looking for a good mystery, although I should warn that it is definitely not for the faint of heart.
__________________
I really just want you all angry and confused the whole time.
Iro's Top 100 Movies v3.0



Jawbreaker -




An awesome cast with a pretty entertaining plot and storyline. This is my first rewatch--I haven't seen it in years--and I liked it a lot. The movie feels rushed and some dialogue sequences seem awkward, but all that aside, Jawbreaker is a fun comedy and a decent movie. It may be deserving of a slightly lesser score, but my personal enjoyment for it and nostalgia raise it to that level for me.

Charlie's Ghost -




Cheech!
__________________
"The mind is its own place, and in itself
Can make a Heaven of Hell, a Hell of Heaven."
John Milton, Paradise Lost

My Movie Review Thread | My Top 100



In Bruges -


Wow, holy crap is like the only way to describe just how great this movie actually is. I guess the best place to start off with is that, if is wasn't for The Dark Knight coming out in 2008, this would by far be my absolute favorite of 2008. This easily tops Gran Torino and Wall-E, which were my other two favorites from 2008, hell this even comes very close to beating out TDK for me, which also reminds me that it's time for another rewatch of TDK. I actually wasn't very sure if I'd like it that much, because first of all it's just a very weird movie to me, the movie really doesn't take long to get to the point though.

I guess 2008 was just the year for Cloin Ferrell, I mean IMO, his two best performances, this and Pride And Glory both came out in the same year. I really can't decide which was better though, because his roles in both were very different. Pride And Glory was more of a serious of a movie with a very serious performance from Ferrell, this was more of a dark action comedy but he was still very great in both. Jordan Prentice was my favorite character in this though, I don't know what it was about his character, but he was just super likeable. Anyways, Clémence Poésy was very hot, I want to see her in some movies because it was good seeing her on screen with the time she got. I felt Ralph Fiennes should've had some more screen time though, other than his voice, he wasn't even in the movie until the last 30 minutes of it.

This for me was the biggest surprise of 2008 by far, I mean the trailer just looked plain weird so I really wasn't sure what to expect. Actually I really had no interest in seeing this from the trailer, and the only reason I even saw this was because of great I kept hearing it was. I'm really, and I really mean really, glad that I decided to go out and buy this tonight. I'm a little sad that it didn't get nominated for 'Best Picture', but then again none of my 4 favorites of 2008 made it in there either. I have no doubt that it'll take home 'Best Original Screenplay' though, it's very easily better than anything else it's running against. If you're skeptical about seeing this, like I was, do yourself a favor and actually see it. Especially is you like dark comedies, because I'm sure that you won't be disappointed a bit.




Welcome to the human race...


The General (Bruckman & Keaton, 1927) -


I'm not entirely sure about this, but I think the last time I ever watched a silent film all the way through was when I watched Un Chien Andalou a few years ago (and that was only fifteen minutes long). Granted, by most feature-length standards, The General is still on the short side, but fortunately it gets everything it needs to across in the space of an hour and fifteen minutes.

The General is about a hapless train driver (Buster Keaton) and the two things he lives for - his girlfriend (Marion Mack) and his train engine, the titular General. When the American Civil War draws close to home and cause both girl and train to be captured by Union soldiers, Keaton's character pursues the thieves and in doing so ends up caught in the middle of an impending battle.

The General is damned good in many respects. It's first and foremost a comedy (and Keaton does pack plenty of jokes into the short runtime, and many of them are downright hilarious), but I was also surprised at just how much more it seemed than that. The storyline - a competent, possibly true, story of one particularly intricate Union plot and Keaton's ingenious yet foolish attempts to foil it - was strong, as was the production itself, which felt like much more of an epic with its heavy usage of period costumes, buildings and objects. The depiction of the Union as the enemy was also rather unusual, at least to me.

If there's anyone out there who doubts in the ability of a random silent film to make a person laugh - this one will definitely do just fine. Now I think I'll try seeking out some of Charlie Chaplin's work.



Keaton did the stunt work himself of course. That scene of him at the front of the train, knocking the logs away from his path, that's pretty dangerous. As for Chaplin, well I'm sure you know the one's to pick from, Modern Times or City Lights are my favourites of his silent work.

Now I'm going to watch This is Spinal Tap for probably the tenth time.
__________________
"Don't be so gloomy. After all it's not that awful. Like the fella says, in Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love - they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock."





THE UNINVITED



Growing up I watched a lot of movies over and over again on tv. Mostly on USA, TNT, and local network channels. Some of them were good. Many of them weren't. A lot of it unfortunately consisted of crap like The Road to Wellville and True Crime (not the Arnie one, the Kevin Dillon one). But one really got to me and not in a good way. The Hand that Rocks the Cradle. Yeesh. Not sure how well it would hold up now but I explicitly remember that movie not only scaring my pants off but really wrapping me up in the story, making me feel as if I was right there with the main character, totally aware of what this crazy monster woman was but having no one around to believe me. Good stuff and The Uninvited tries to take that same general premise of creepy woman, something like a nanny, skating in and trying to take over a family except tailoring it for attention defiicient teenagers. What does that mean? Well, they throw in a whole bunch of faux clairvoyant imaginary sequences. We can thank The Sixth Sense and The Ring for that. That part of it didn't really work for me, but overall, the whole package did.

A great part of the film's success is owed to the lead actress, Emily Browning who uses not only her exemplary acting skills but her innocent (and very hot) appearance to get the audience on her side from the word "go". She has an appeal that cannot be created through any amount of acting classes or cosmetic surgeries. She just has it. Or maybe she just plays a damn good victim and I'm smitten to death. Dunno. Another reason the movie was so fun was the direction, which is a surprise considering the type of movie this is. When it comes to cash-in teen horror flicks like this the directing is usually of a very flamboyant and attention drawing nature, but the directors of The Uninvited (The Guard Brothers) try their best to not feed their own egos and instead focus on keeping us in the movie.

So what didn't work? Well, the story is essentially an MTV infused take on The Hand that Rocks the Cradle (and apparently the Korean horror, A Tale of Two Sisters, which I never saw) and the plot never really takes any time to breath. It's always crashing forward because it doesn't trust its audience to have the patience to sit through any slower scenes of any real character development outside of what is necessary. Also there are the little twist and turns that Hollywood has come to be so fond of but most of them get the job done. The ones that don't work though, REALLY don't work. That's the type of thing I've come to expect from movies like these. BUT IT'S ALL OKAY to me because the film's entertainment value outweighs its flaws.

No matter which way I cut it though this IS a "cash-in teen horror flick" but I say it's a pretty good one. If that is definitely not your cup of tea, by all means stay away but I do think this is a well put together thriller and if that's what you're in the mood for, check this out. Just don't go to a packed showing on Saturday night like I did...



Hello Salem, my name's Winifred. What's yours
Rashomon - i know its a classic and all but it isnt an 'enjoyable' film, i dont think people watch this for entertainment purposes anymore. Of course the editing and the non linear storytelling approach are interesting to watch but thats about it for me.
__________________



Will your system be alright, when you dream of home tonight?

MY BLOODY VALENTINE 3D

Let me start by saying that this movie was really really fun. And if you're going to see it, shell out the extra $2 to go see it in 3D. It really surprised me by how much I enjoyed myself.

Now for the real review, I'll start by addressing the thing that if you're even thinking of seeing this, the kills. Some were pretty bland, lots of oh, here's a shield, this will protect me, then after a while fail to dodge. Some where kind of mediocre, a nurse being pickaxed in the back. And some where just off-the-wall cool, shovel used in a way that they probably shouldn't. You even get the cliche of partying teens being killed.

And yes, plenty of gore. You see a persons ribcage, without the skin covering it. You even see lots of human hearts, in chocolate heart candy. It just never looked that realistic. But for a movie like this, I guess we have to suspend belief for an hour and half. The 3d enhanced this a lot though, the beginning scene does feel like it drags you into the movie.

Now as far as the technical aspect goes, the direction was meh. I think I was the only one who noticed, but during some of the later kill scenes (starting with Red in the mine) it looked like someone was like speeding the film up. It was just weird. Also, it used the AvP:R method of being to dark at times. You've got it man, you've got to flaunt it.

As far as the script goes, lots of people make stupid decisions (Sarah and Tom in the car towards the end.) The ending was pretty stupid, I mean they try to throw you a curve ball, but it's still a bad ball thrown. While still talking about baseball, this curve ball was so bad, it almost hits you in the kahunas. It also ended in the cliche way of the killer, I'll be back, way. I'm not even sure, why the killer did it. No motive appeared, even after the flashy montage.

The acting doesn't really help the script either. Jensen Ackles can barely act, and is quickly becoming the next Paul Walker. I never felt any chemistry between him and Jamie King. It was even worse with Kerr Smith. One role I really did like was a naked Betsy Rue,not just because she's naked (but it certainly helps) but the fact that she's funny, campy, and delivers a hella good scream.

To wrap it up, MBV is a so-so movie. But I had fun watching it and I think you will too.
__________________
I used to be addicted to crystal meth, now I'm just addicted to Breaking Bad.
Originally Posted by Yoda
If I were buying a laser gun I'd definitely take the XF-3800 before I took the "Pew Pew Pew Fun Gun."



Sammieb91's Avatar
BANNED
They are given almost zero interesting background and the information devulged has to do with furthering the sub-par storyline. Last but not least is the dialogue, which sucks.

The only good thing that has come out of me seeing this movie is that I have finally seen the light on the whole Kate Beckinsale thing. She is one hot momma.

You do know this is a prequel????? If you dont understand the story or the characters, and dont even like Underworld at all, why see this?

This was a pretty good prequel for this storyline. The story was laid down well and the characters were nicely written into the story. As for Kate Beckinsale, I dont know why she was even placed at the end. They used footage from a previous Underworld and just stuck it at the end. That was freakin lame.



Originally Posted by Sammieb91
You do know this is a prequel????? If you dont understand the story or the characters, and dont even like Underworld at all, why see this?

This was a pretty good prequel for this storyline. The story was laid down well and the characters were nicely written into the story. As for Kate Beckinsale, I dont know why she was even placed at the end. They used footage from a previous Underworld and just stuck it at the end. That was freakin lame.
Say whaaaaaaaaat? My write-up was for the second Underworld but you make it sound as if I was critiquing the newest one. I'm well aware that it's a prequel and I list my reasons for watching Evolution and my intentions to watch the newest installment in my review. I'm glad to hear you liked Rise of the Lycans though but I'm not glad you spoiled the Beckinsale cameo at the end. I had my fingers crossed they'd superimpose her face in somewhere but you've ruined that tantalizing dream for me. Thanks. A lot.



Welcome to the human race...


Vanishing Point (Sarafian, 1971) -


Kowalski (Barry Newman) is a car delivery man. He's been assigned to drive a Dodge Challenger from Denver to San Francisco. Simple enough, except that his high-speed driving is considered a menace to society and the police start trying to bring him in. However, he becomes something of a hero to the people, thanks largely in part to "Super Soul" (Cleavon Little), a blind DJ who broadcasts updates of Kowalski's progress over the radio.

The hype surrounding Vanishing Point had led me to believe this was a simple action movie that revolved around one large chase between one man and the police. While that plot is a rather apt description of what happens, Vanishing Point is less about thrills and excitement and is more of a journey of self-discovery of sorts for Kowalski. It does seem to fit in with the general vibe of road trip movies that were so popular in the wake of Easy Rider (which Vanishing Point bore many similarities to in my mind). As a result, there are plenty of occasions where Kowalski ends up meeting odd characters or having strange experiences. These have little if any effect on the film's actual plot and were probably thrown in to have some deeper meaning or some such thing (as did the film's ending, which I have to admit I did not see coming).

Or did it? I often wonder if some of the stuff was thrown in for the hell of it (like a naked girl on a motorcycle) and whoever watched was supposed to get something out of it. I guess it's supposed to help develop Kowalski's character (as are a handful of random flashbacks and police reports) and make us care about what actually happens to him over the course of the movie. Or not, as the case may be. I don't know. I wasn't really ready for some kind of ham-fisted social commentary.

Even the car scenes don't feel that exciting. Even though I've realised that the chases in and of themselves are unimportant compared to the importance of the characters who are involved, surely the chases could be at least halfway engaging. Be a little considerate for whoever picked this up looking for a mindless chase movie, not for some sort of metaphorical exploration of existentialism. While I admit that can work for me, in the case of Vanishing Point it was a little too far and really did slow the movie up a lot - and for a chase movie, that's a handicap.





UNDERWORLD: RISE OF THE LYCANS



While this film was a far superior piece of entertainment when compared to the other two Underworld flicks it still fell just short of actually being good. The story, if you're at all interested, is about the first Lycan, Lucian, that can assume human form leading the rest of his kind in a rebellion against the vampire upper class. He does this with the help of his smokin' hot squeeze, Sonja. Part of the reason that the plot works so much better here instead of the other flicks has to do with the fact that the writers tried to stuff less half baked vampire/werewolf mythology into too small a space of time and instead contented themselves with just stuffing in as much bloody supernatural carnage as they could muster. Not a step in the official "How to Make a Cinematic Masterpiece" handbook but it'll do in a pinch.

Rise of the Lycans is clearly an attempt to squeeze just a little bit more money out of this Underworld franchise which, in my opinion, is in dire need of a fatal blow to the head so we may forget about it. These are my current feelings despite the fact that I didn't totally dislike this film. It's just that this movie seems like the best possible Underworld movie that could've been made and it still wasn't good. The reason for its mediocrity? Well, it's just an hour and a half of gore and people walking around in medieval clothing spitting uninspired dialogue which the writers didn't even bother translating into proper Ole English! The audacity...

I'd avoid this one.



Hello Salem, my name's Winifred. What's yours
Say whaaaaaaaaat? My write-up was for the second Underworld but you make it sound as if I was critiquing the newest one. I'm well aware that it's a prequel and I list my reasons for watching Evolution and my intentions to watch the newest installment in my review. I'm glad to hear you liked Rise of the Lycans though but I'm not glad you spoiled the Beckinsale cameo at the end. I had my fingers crossed they'd superimpose her face in somewhere but you've ruined that tantalizing dream for me. Thanks. A lot.
Agreement. Douchebaggery





Ms. 45
aka Angel of Vengeance (Abel Ferrarra 1981)
+
I'd only ever seen the heavily cut (by a massive 1 minute and 42 seconds) UK version of this movie entitled Angel Of Vengeance. US prints run a little longer on dvd but are still nevertheless slightly cut. The only complete version of the film is the French dvd release entitled L'ange De La Vengeance; naturally it's become highly sought after and regularly exchanges hands for silly money on the internet. Recently I was lucky enough to get my hands on a dvd-r copy of the French release allowing me to finally see this cult gem as Ferrarra originally intended.

The story is about Thana (the late* Zoë Lund billed as Zoë Tamerlis here) an incredibly beautiful mute girl who works as a seamstress for a successful New York fashion designer. On her way home from work one evening Thana is dragged into an alleyway and raped by an opportunistic masked attacker. Deeply traumatized she stumbles back to her apartment, only to be met with an intruder there, who at gunpoint, rapes her for a second time. Desensitized by such violent misfortune Thana fights back, managing to bludgeon the man to death with a paper weight. Now armed herself, a disturbed Thana begins a one woman crime-wave systematically murdering would be rapists, pimps, and ultimately any man who even looks in her direction.

This is quite possibly the best 'rape-revenge' exploitation flick I've ever seen; it easily rises above such depraved efforts as Wes Craven's The Last House On The Left, and Meir Zarchi's 1978 crapfest I Spit On Your Grave (which granted wouldn't be very hard). I'm actually reminded more of Roman Polanski's classic 1965 horror Repulsion when I watch this. There are indeed huge similarities between Deneuve's near mute, prudish, emotionally detached Carole, and Lund's seemingly vulnerable, shy mute Thana; It's merely their separate descents into madness that differ.



Much of the success of this film lies in Ferrarra's decision to make his protagonist a mute which is inspired rather than compensation for limited acting ability. Lund is sensational as Thana with her incredible expressive features perfectly conveying terror, despair, resignation, and ultimately an unhinged ruthless disregard for human (correction, male) life. The rape sequences whilst never pleasant are also remarkably restrained for this type of fare, with Ferrarra nearly always keeping the camera fixed on Lund's amazing facial expressions. As a result the tansformation in Thana from timid beauty to insane femme fatale is always convincing, even if the setup is a little contrived. Ultimately you care a great deal about her, not just because of her misfortune and Lund's beauty, but because Ferrarra's savvy direction effectively puts you in her shoes.

I can't deny that Ms. 45 is a very basic film with a cynical exploitative premise, but all things considered it's also a very good one that completely deserves it's cult status. The only titilation on offer here is in seeing Thana casually dispatch countless mysoginistic scumbags who completely deserve it; plus not only that but doing it with a high degree of style. For a film labelled as exploitation there's absolutely no nudity or gore on offer, just the promise of an arty kick ass movie. Recommended.

* Zoë Lund, a firm advocate of herion use sadly passed away in 1999 from drug-related heart failure.