The Fellowship Of The Ring

→ in
Tools    





Answers to some of your queries:

WARNING: "The Fellowship of the Ring" spoilers below
1) Yes, Gimli's talk of Moria was odd, and poorly done...though not horribly so. Thankfully they chose something mostly insignificant to mess up a bit...though it wasn't a TOTAL messup. Let's not forget that, in Middle-Earth, you can't call your cousin Balin on the cell-phone to ask how things are in Moria. In the book, though, it seems that Gimli and his people have not heard from Moria, but, as a result, pretty much know that something is up.

B) As we mentioned in IMs, the dudes are Merry and Pippin.

3) Sorry guys, I'll respectfully disagree: I though, perhaps, there was a LITTLE too much focus on his troubled expressions, and the ring...but not much. More his face than the ring...the ring deserved 99% of the camera time it got.

D) Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli are going to go try to rescue Merry and Pippin. As I'm sure you've no doubt guessed, however, a lot more will happen to them as a result of doing that.



Now With Moveable Parts
Originally posted by Timing
How about this genius idea, Aragon could have referred to her as princess arwen instead of acting like she's the good samaritan walking around in the dark. In fact until her last scene in the movie you don't even know that they even know each other.
Actually you do. When they see each other for the first time, he touches her hand when she's about to leave, tenderly, and says," Be careful." they also discussed who was the faster rider, which would imply that they knew each other.



I ain't gettin' in no fryer!
I'm going to stop trying to break this movie down. I'll wait til all three movies are released to make my decisions.
__________________
"I was walking down the street with my friend and he said, "I hear music", as if there is any other way you can take it in. You're not special, that's how I receive it too. I tried to taste it but it did not work." - Mitch Hedberg



Timing's Avatar
Registered User
Subtleties = nuances
Subtitles = written translation of dialogue

I'll go see the movie again soon and check out all the stuff again.



I deliberatly didn't read any of this thread.

It was ana amazing film, epic, intimate, brilliant. It is what film and cinema and yes, dare I say it, movies are all about. It took your wholley to another time, another place and let you walk among the halls of Rivendell, the woodlands of Lothlorien, and the mines of Moria. It was brilliant.

Next step, the two towers -- which means much more of Christopher Lee and even better, our first really good look at my favorite character from the book [note I see book, not book] -- GOLLUM.

This film was great, and basically, it can only get better.
__________________
www.esotericrabbit.com



Here's a question for some of ya'll: how did your opinion of the film change upon multiple viewings? I know Holden's seen it several times. I don't know who else has had the privelage to see it more than once, though.

I've seen it three times, and my opinions did shift a little each time, as is to be expected. The sequence in Moria is better than I gave it credit for the first time around (even though I thought it was amazing the first time around), and the score is amazing. I didn't notice the score TOO much the first time around...too much to look at, and it fit so well with the movie in general. The second and third times I took greater note of the music in the background.

I also found it amazing that I was more chocked up during my third viewing than during my first or second. I also became more aware of Frodo's facial expressions (which worked wonders), and some of the things in the background. Anyone catch the director's cameo in Bree, or the Hobbits camping out amongst some familiar ol' trolls with Strider? (personally, I missed PJ the first time around...but I think I read about it afterwards, and subsequently saw it clearly the next two times. I didn't notice the trolls the first time, either. Nice touch.)



I noticed Jackson's cameo the first time I saw The Fellowship of the Ring, or at least I thought surely that had to be him. On my second viewing, when I knew exactly where to look, it cleared any doubts I had - it is definitely him.
__________________
"Film is a disease. When it infects your bloodstream it takes over as the number one hormone. It bosses the enzymes, directs the pineal gland, plays Iago to your psyche. As with heroin, the antidote to Film is more Film." - Frank Capra



Just after the four Hobbits enter Bree, before they find the Prancing Pony, Jackson can be seen as a drunk on the street in the rain. He's on the right-hand side of the frame. He spins toward the camera and belches. It's a quick cut, but if you know what to look for, you'll see him.



WARNING: "The Fellowship of the Ring" spoilers below

I just saw this movie and I don't think I liked it all that much. Of course I didn't think There's Something about Mary was all that funny either and everybody loved that too. So maybe it's me. ;p

What was this movie about? It's like hi, I have hairy feet let's run! Where was the charaterization? I saw some but not a whole lot, I just saw run and fight run and fight. Why did they let Gandolf die? They could have helped him up. That sucked. If the ring is so important why are there only nine people trying to destroy it? There should be armies. What else can the ring do besides turn people invisible and extend their lives? What's up with Sam and Frodo being gay? Was that nessasary?

I agree with Spud, I didn't like the ending. I think it might be better to buy all three movies as a set and watch them all together over a period of days. This movie seemed like one long introduction to me. It'll probably be a cult favorite and live on in movie history when it's all done tho.


Btw, I've never read the books or seen the cartoons or muppets.



WARNING: "Fellowship of the Ring" spoilers below
Firstly, in regards to "letting" Gandalf die -- they didn't. He told them to run and let him take care of the Balrog. So they did, next thing they know he's on the edge and a sh!tload of Orcs are firing arrows at them.


WARNING: "The Two Towers" spoilers below
Secondly, Gandalf doesn't even die. He comes back as Gandalf the White.


Regarding the characterisation, I didn't notice any problems with it. What you need to realise is the both wizards, elves, dwarves, hobbits and men are not that much different except in spirituality and culture. Basically, all of them are just PEOPLE. In the books, [I know, I know, you haven't read them] you forget that the hobbits look the way they do, height wise, or that the elve and the dwarve are meant to look totally different. They are all people with special traits, and those traits were well brought to the screen.

I am not even going to go into this but, Frodo and Sam were NOT gay.



What's up with Sam and Frodo being gay? Was that nessasary?
What's up with being homophobic? Is that nessasary?

And I'm straight, BTW, in case anyone was wondering.
__________________
Everything is destined to reappear as simulation.
Jean Baudrillard
America, 1988



Me? I'm not homophobic. You mean JR Tolkien. Or did you not notice how everyone in the movie is gay except for the humans? Hobbits, gay. Burly dwarf guy, gay. Bilbo, gay. Gandalf who's always hanging out with hobbits, gay. Elves, bisexual. That's what I'm saying, we get it, to be gay is to be an unaturall strange creature. Did we really need to see Sam and Frodo hugging to figure out this movies true message? Subtle is better sometimes.



Heh, heh. Funny, man. You had me going there for a second.



I was gonna say...I thought you were serious. I start fuming when people think they're gay. Can't these fools see PAST their own time and place? This was written around 50 years ago. There's no sexuality in the books, really. None. There's no hidden anything; it's meant like a historical record of sorts...which is one of the reasons so many people find the books to be boring.

And dude, it's Gandalf, not Gandolf. Argh.

WARNING: "The Two Towers" spoilers below
Silver is right. Gandalf lives, my friend.


WARNING: "The Fellowship of the Ring" spoilers below
They didn't let him fall. He was right on the edge, for all we know the Balrog was hanging on the other end of the whip, they're already quite a ways away, the bridge is unstable, and orcs are running over to fire at them! and yes, "it sucked" is correct. That's the idea: you're supposed to feel their UTTER devestation as Gandalf, their friend and their main reason for hoping this will work, falls in a most horrifying and depressing way.

Furthermore, there is NO way they ought to send armies there. For one, you heard Elrond: their army cannot stand up to the armies of Mordor and Isengard. Y'know what would happen if they went marching in there? They'd get the crap kicked out of them. Choosing nine to go mirrors th choice to let the hobbits go: stealth. People won't notice 9 characters sneaking around the back entrance, just as Sauron isn't as likely to notice two tiny hobbits creeping into Mordor.

As far as The One Ring's powers: invisibility and youthfulness are part of it, but it depends on how far you go with it. It doesn't have a specific power, ala "Flight" or "super-strength." It depends on what you use it for...but above all, it is meant to corrupt those who wear it, save for Sauron. You heard Aragorn at The Council of Elrond: "it answers to Sauron...it has no other master."

Run and fight, run and fight? Man, were you watching this movie? It was emotional as hell. I've teared up to some degree all three times I've seen it. It was not just action with running inbetween. And please, someone else give me an "amen" on how fortunate and timely that "the time that is given to us" exchange was between Gandalf and Frodo in Moria? Amazing timing...and dumb luck, really. It was so applicable to today.



I watched the most brilliant documentary that combined information on the film and on Tolkien's life, and I can only hope it will be on the DVD.

It started by going through, like you know "the making of" stuff, and while this was enjoyable for a a part [very enjoyable in fact, they found "Hobbiton" a year before shooting and started planting vegetables and gardens so it looked 100 years old when they got there!] it then progressed into the more interesting stuff -- the universal themes that Tolkien was using and the insperation for Quenya from Finland and the mythology he felt the Britain had been robbed of. It also compared Hobbiton to his home town of Manchester and the destruction of it to the industrial revolution to Sauron taking over Middle Earth. It also went into depth that some of the writing's he wrote in the trenches of WWI became pre-requsite writings of hobbiton and Middle Earth. Despite the fact that he once wrote "Once in a hole a hill there lived a Hobbit" on the back of a blank test paper, is irrelevant and this doco argues that despite Tolkien saying it wasn't [because he so badly didn't want it to be linked to modern times -- he wanted it to be this mythology] that Middle Earth began a long time before, when he was a teenager and during WWI. He also refused to admit that WWII compelled him to write even further into it, good vs. evil, and once again that was because he so badly wanted to write a mythology for Britain.

Having Elijah Wood was a waste of time, he's "insights" were pointless, but Ian McKellen, Cate Blanchett, Peter Jackson and especially Christopher Lee gave fantastic insight. It ultimatly showed how the story and theme became so much to them. Christopher Lee ended by comparing the story to any stage of history -- but especially the one we are living in right now. He said:

"Today, I believe, that there are more conflicts and indeed wars than anywhere else in the world....and where is the ring-bearer?"



WARNING: "The Fellowship Of The Ring" spoilers below
And please, someone else give me an "amen" on how fortunate and timely that "the time that is given to us" exchange was between Gandalf and Frodo in Moria?


AMEN!

Really, that insight of Gandalf's is applicable to any time, any place, in history or in our personal lives. It's just especially poignant now.



As I said: Everything is universal. Good Vs. Evil. Small people doing big things. Everything is those books is always applicable. That's the point.



Sure it was, the movie starts with an introduction of the ring and the basic plot of the movie. Then it's just run and fight, run and fight. They were still running and fighting when it ended. What else happened? It was a movie about nothing. Something will happend in later parts but this one was just a long introduction. As a stand alone movie it lacks something. It can't stand alone, it needs it's other parts. I did think it was good tho. The parts that made me emotional were the Hobbits being scared. Whaaa! To be a little fellow in a world of big humans and scary monsters! Bilbo regretting passing the ring on to Frodo. Waaaa!

WARNING: "Lord of the Rings" spoilers below
When Gandalf died. When they were trapped in the mines. I thought they were gonna get lost and die in there. It felt like they were screwed and it made me depressed. When they were talking about how crazy it was to try and destroy the ring by taking it back to where it was created. I felt like they were gonna die. No freaking way will they be able to do it.

It was goofy that they let Frodo and his friends take it. They should have gathered the best warriors from around the country to form the Fellowship. Frodo could still take it cuz he's incorruptible. I wouldn't trust that motley crew with the most important task in history. That was like throwing the ring away.


As for the gay thing.
WARNING: "Lord of the Rings" spoilers below
This movie was chok-a-blok full of gay references. The Hobbits all liked Gandalf and his big staff. The wizard fight. Where they battle it out with their staffs. That's a parody of straight testosterone rich men. Merry & Pippins, an obvious refference to Mary Poppins. Mary being a gay term, and they were clearly gay anyway. Gandalf being trapped atop a big phallic symbol tower and how does he escape? By talking to a butterfly. Like I said before, every unnatural creature was gay or bisexy except humans. That elf girl who was about in the woods was only there to show that humans like girls. And how do we know elves have matching elf parts anyway? The fellowship of the ring. Imagine a ring of men standing in a circle. I think you can figure out what that means. Being chased around by orcs. Orc coming from the word dork. Dork being slang for penis. The way Frodo is saved by his frilly underwear. Pays to dress up doesn't it?