See, again, you're just repeating yourself. It doesn't necessarily make a film awkward and inferior to change the message. There's nothing wrong with "retrofitting" or updating a story to try to regain relevance or to explore alternative ("unintended") views.
You are primarily concerned because you dislike alternative viewpoints, as you admitted.
Of course I'm repeating myself: you're asking the same question without acknowledging or incirporating the answer given the first time. For example, it just happened again: yes, it doesn't
necessarily make a film awkward. I've said that, like, three times (see
this post). But in actual reality, we see a strong correlation. You can delight in the Pyrrhic victory that it isn't a
law or a
rule, which I agree with, but it's a strong correlation that common sense deductions can elegantly explain.
I idea that I "admitted" I dislike alternative viewpoints is kind of odd. It's built into the definition of the words. If their existence was perfectly neutral to me, they wouldn't be alternative viewpoints. But no, I'm not primarily concerned with them, nor are they the focus of the essay.
Anyway, looks like my disclaimer a half-dozen posts ago was right on the money.