Your rating for this film is way too high. What a lazy conclusion to a lazy trilogy.
1 pesky sciuridae, 504 leaps, an unknown number of fillums
I had no idea when I clicked on this thread what I was going to enter. A film diary thread... well okay then. Quite an interesting name you came up with there...
Most unfortunate that you watched the remake before the original Solaris.
Most unfortunate that you watched the remake before the original Solaris.
X
Favorite Movies
I had no idea when I clicked on this thread what I was going to enter. A film diary thread... well okay then. Quite an interesting name you came up with there...
Most unfortunate that you watched the remake before the original Solaris.
Have you seen any other Tarkovsky movies?
20th March:
54. Michael Collins (Neil Jordan - 1996, tv) +
Fairly accurate biopic but Julia Roberts as Kitty was a terrible casting choice and the love triangle features too heavily for my liking.
55. The Day (Douglas Aarniokoski - 2011, dvd) +
Low budget post-apocalyptic movie that doesn't really have much to offer outside of some bursts of action that are ok imo.
54. Michael Collins (Neil Jordan - 1996, tv) +
Fairly accurate biopic but Julia Roberts as Kitty was a terrible casting choice and the love triangle features too heavily for my liking.
55. The Day (Douglas Aarniokoski - 2011, dvd) +
Low budget post-apocalyptic movie that doesn't really have much to offer outside of some bursts of action that are ok imo.
Last edited by Chypmunk; 03-20-16 at 02:32 PM.
All of Tarkovsky's movies are masterpieces, but I think the one that mesmerized me the most was Andrei Rublev. You should try ordering them online instead of waiting ten years.
X
Favorite Movies
All of Tarkovsky's movies are masterpieces, but I think the one that mesmerized me the most was Andrei Rublev. You should try ordering them online instead of waiting ten years.
'Online'? What's that then? We only have stone etched movies over here, hence the long wait times
Vegan?
Last edited by Chypmunk; 03-21-16 at 07:23 AM.
I eat animals on a daily basis. Killing off endangerd species, destroying the environment, things like that I just think are stupid, but hurting animals to make brilliant art is not something I have an issue with. I can't really think of a philosophy of life that takes issue with hurting animals that makes any sense. And from a religious perspective, I don't think animals have souls. I wouldn't crush an ant for pleasure any more than I'd crush a flower. But I wouldn't take an issue with either being crushed in a film.
I'm not criticising you though, just sharing my perspective.
I'm not criticising you though, just sharing my perspective.
X
Favorite Movies
I'm not criticising you though, just sharing my perspective.
Mind if I ask why the hurt of animals is an issue for you in regards to that particular Tarkovsky movie?
I've never seen any movie like it in regards to what they did with animals, and not merely in terms of hurt. I think you SHOULD watch it. Of course it's all up to you and I have no intention of trying to convince you to do something you don't want to do. Just that it is art in the purest sense of "art."
I've never seen any movie like it in regards to what they did with animals, and not merely in terms of hurt. I think you SHOULD watch it. Of course it's all up to you and I have no intention of trying to convince you to do something you don't want to do. Just that it is art in the purest sense of "art."
X
Favorite Movies
Mind if I ask why the hurt of animals is an issue for you in regards to that particular Tarkovsky movie?
I've never seen any movie like it in regards to what they did with animals, and not merely in terms of hurt. I think you SHOULD watch it. Of course it's all up to you and I have no intention of trying to convince you to do something you don't want to do. Just that it is art in the purest sense of "art."
I've never seen any movie like it in regards to what they did with animals, and not merely in terms of hurt. I think you SHOULD watch it. Of course it's all up to you and I have no intention of trying to convince you to do something you don't want to do. Just that it is art in the purest sense of "art."
Fret not - nobody is capable of convincing me to do anything I don't want to nor conversely to not do something I want to
Fret not - nobody is capable of convincing me to do anything I don't want to nor conversely to not do something I want to
__________________
5-time MoFo Award winner.
5-time MoFo Award winner.
X
Favorite Movies
X
User Lists
I eat animals on a daily basis. Killing off endangerd species, destroying the environment, things like that I just think are stupid, but hurting animals to make brilliant art is not something I have an issue with. I can't really think of a philosophy of life that takes issue with hurting animals that makes any sense. And from a religious perspective, I don't think animals have souls. I wouldn't crush an ant for pleasure any more than I'd crush a flower. But I wouldn't take an issue with either being crushed in a film.
I'm not criticising you though, just sharing my perspective.
I'm not criticising you though, just sharing my perspective.
X
Favorite Movies
X
User Lists
23rd March:
56. The Enigma of Kaspar Hauser [Jeder für sich und Gott gegen alle] (Werner Herzog - 1974, tv)
An intriguing (and odd as befits Herzog) period character tale that is well enough presented and it's lead tries hard in a very difficult role but sadly it's no Aguirre or Fitzcarraldo for me.
56. The Enigma of Kaspar Hauser [Jeder für sich und Gott gegen alle] (Werner Herzog - 1974, tv)
An intriguing (and odd as befits Herzog) period character tale that is well enough presented and it's lead tries hard in a very difficult role but sadly it's no Aguirre or Fitzcarraldo for me.