Re: How Much Energy Do You Truly Transmit To MovieForums?
I saw them. Sorry. I'll try not to think less of you.
Try. |
Re: How Much Energy Do You Truly Transmit To MovieForums?
These days, very little. Not only do I have less free time than I have had in the past, it seems that I have unfortunately grew away from the forums, and even movies a little. I hope that this can change in the future when things become a little more stable in my life.
|
Originally Posted by Swan (Post 1939536)
My last few posts on here may be the dumbest posts I've ever posted.
|
Originally Posted by Ultraviolence (Post 1939487)
I'm from Brazil.
|
Originally Posted by MovieGal (Post 1939555)
Are you friends with Guap? He's from Brazil too.
|
Originally Posted by Nostromo87 (Post 1939525)
Yes, got it from the DVD cover of his Night of the Ghouls (1959).
The second question catches me slightly befuddled, estimate all manifestations count, yet I sincerely hadn't thought of suggesting that kind of distinction!
Originally Posted by MovieGal (Post 1939555)
Are you friends with Guap? He's from Brazil too.
|
I don't post nearly as much as I want and my posts generally aren't long or well thought out, but relative to the time and energy I have, I put a lot into it. Rarely do I just sit down and look at the forum. Most of my posts are while I'm waiting in line, on the crapper, or something like that.
|
Re: How Much Energy Do You Truly Transmit To MovieForums?
It highly depends. My posts range from short and jokey to more elaborate. I think I put the most work into my reviews, since I want to say what I thought of the movie in a way that's engaging, not just give a few lines and then slap on the rating (which I only did for The Cure For Wellness, when I was finding my way). I'm not happy with all the reviews I've written (the one for Grease is one of the worse in a while), but dammit I try hard. The only thing that matters is that people like reading them. And it seems to work so far.
Still feel bad for my Maggie review going under the radar, but oh well. |
Originally Posted by mattiasflgrtll6 (Post 1939572)
It highly depends. My posts range from short and jokey to more elaborate. I think I put the most work into my reviews, since I want to say what I thought of the movie in a way that's engaging, not just give a few lines and then slap on the rating (which I only did for The Cure For Wellness, when I was finding my way). I'm not happy with all the reviews I've written (the one for Grease is one of the worse in a while), but dammit I try hard. The only thing that matters is that people like reading them. And it seems to work so far.
Still feel bad for my Maggie review going under the radar, but oh well. |
@mattiasflgrtll6
Your Grease review was a fun and interesting read! I'd be happy if I wrote that. I liked the way you wove the theme of the movie through out your review, and especially the opening paragraph told me what I needed to know about the film and also left an intriguing question as to would they get tighter again or not? Lucky you that you seen it at the big screen! Have you seen Grease II? It often doesn't get great reviews, but I loved it. |
Re: How Much Energy Do You Truly Transmit To MovieForums?
Not as much as I used to. More than Camo Sean or Swan, less than SC and Cricket.
|
Re: How Much Energy Do You Truly Transmit To MovieForums?
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 1939578)
Your Grease review was a fun and interesting read! I'd be happy if I wrote that. I liked the way you wove the theme of the movie through out your review, and especially the opening paragraph told me what I needed to know about the film and also left an intriguing question as to would they get tighter again or not?
Lucky you that you seen it at the big screen! Have you seen Grease II? It often doesn't get great reviews, but I loved it. No, I haven't seen Grease II. I've seen many sequels in my life, but ones to musicals is the exception. |
Originally Posted by rauldc14 (Post 1939581)
Not as much as I used to. More than Camo Sean or Swan
|
Originally Posted by Camo (Post 1939591)
I'm running a Countdown, son. Equal with me right now at best :p Yeah but after that you'll transmit more neutrons or whatever.
My letterboxd activity is rising though! Another list for you to check out. |
Originally Posted by rauldc14 (Post 1939581)
Not as much as I used to. More than Camo Sean or Swan, less than SC and Cricket.
|
|
Originally Posted by Sexy Celebrity (Post 1939614)
I'll ask this in here so I won't have to make another thread:
What are the SECRETS to transmitting less energy here? What brain tricks do you use to not post much? Or even look at the forum much? I just don't think that's possible. Once a MoFo always a MoFo. The only way out is in a box, holmes. |
Originally Posted by Sexy Celebrity (Post 1939619)
Does anyone here have a big box?
I don't like that. What's going on, X-rated? I'm not seeing as much glitter on the forum lately. Frankly, I'm worried. |
Re: How Much Energy Do You Truly Transmit To MovieForums?
He's saying the secret is located somewhere in the shoutbox. :drevil:
|
Re: How Much Energy Do You Truly Transmit To MovieForums?
More than I probably should but less than I used to.
So I voted "Some." |
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:00 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums