Movie Forums (http://www.movieforums.com/community/index.php)
-   Movie Reviews (http://www.movieforums.com/community/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   American Beauty (http://www.movieforums.com/community/showthread.php?t=5937)

led_zeppelin 11-24-03 09:42 AM

American Beauty
 
I just want to know if this movie is good. I'm only 14, but the ONLY movies I'm not allowed to watch are Pulp Fiction and American Beauty. I have been able to watch ANY movie i wanted except for these two. My sister has convinced my mom that these are trash, yet they are both highly acclaimed. So, tell me about it. Like I said, I used the search function, but I didn't find a thread about this.

cazz 11-24-03 10:32 AM

i didnt find american beauty that good, infact i found it really strange. It is basically about a man (kevin spacey) who tries to turn his life around, but he also manages to turn everyone else's lives around at the same time.
it has got a sexual aspect to it but kevin spacey has been made to play a really strange character and he likes this girl that is so much younger than himself (mena suvari).
it also has a lot of swearing in it which kinda puts me off a bit.
hope this helps a bit
cazz
x

Sexy Celebrity 11-24-03 10:37 AM

Originally Posted by led_zeppelin
I just want to know if this movie is good. I'm only 14, but the ONLY movies I'm not allowed to watch are Pulp Fiction and American Beauty. I have been able to watch ANY movie i wanted except for these two. My sister has convinced my mom that these are trash, yet they are both highly acclaimed. So, tell me about it. Like I said, I used the search function, but I didn't find a thread about this.
Ewww. Somebody should bitchslap your sister to the moon. NO! Take her even farther than the moon.

I love those movies. I'm guessing your sister doesn't like the middle aged man/teenage girl sexual relationship of American Beauty, as well as the homosexuality - which probably means she dislikes homosexuals. :sick:

TRASH? That's such a strong word. I imagine your sister and your mom doing dishes together - sister says "That American Beauty is TRASH! And so is that Pulp Fiction. Don't let little led zeppelin watch them later. That one has two guys KISSSSS-ING. And there's a gay rape scene in the Pulp Fiction. Lots of DRUGS too. TRASH TRASH TRASH!"

And then she does a trash dance and stays out all night with the neighborhood jamboree, shaking her hips in a long skirt.

Philmster 11-24-03 10:47 AM

Originally Posted by Sexy Celebrity
TRASH? That's such a strong word. I imagine your sister and your mom doing dishes together - sister says "That American Beauty is TRASH! And so is that Pulp Fiction. Don't let little led zeppelin watch them later. That one has two guys KISSSSS-ING. And there's a gay rape scene in the Pulp Fiction. Lots of DRUGS too. TRASH TRASH TRASH!"

And then she does a trash dance and stays out all night with the neighborhood jamboree, shaking her hips in a long skirt.
lol, good stuff.

Both American Beauty and Pulp Fiction are in my top 10 films, along with a lot of other people, I would just watch them and make your own decision, but, the whole age thing might thwart any attempt you make to watch them...

led_zeppelin 11-24-03 12:10 PM

Originally Posted by Sexy Celebrity
Ewww. Somebody should bitchslap your sister to the moon. NO! Take her even farther than the moon.

I love those movies. I'm guessing your sister doesn't like the middle aged man/teenage girl sexual relationship of American Beauty, as well as the homosexuality - which probably means she dislikes homosexuals. :sick:

TRASH? That's such a strong word. I imagine your sister and your mom doing dishes together - sister says "That American Beauty is TRASH! And so is that Pulp Fiction. Don't let little led zeppelin watch them later. That one has two guys KISSSSS-ING. And there's a gay rape scene in the Pulp Fiction. Lots of DRUGS too. TRASH TRASH TRASH!"

And then she does a trash dance and stays out all night with the neighborhood jamboree, shaking her hips in a long skirt.
Actually, she does not have anything against homosexuals, but if she doesn't like the movie, that I can't watch it cuz she corrupts my mom. Although I have seen Deliverance so the rape is nothing I haven't already see.

Garrett 11-24-03 12:15 PM

You're not allowed to watch Pulp Fiction?! Man, that sucks.

Oh well. :p

LordSlaytan 11-24-03 12:37 PM

There isn't anything worse in American Beauty than there is in American Pie.

Muzzy 11-24-03 01:45 PM

Yeah, and in American Beauty it is done with taste. Pulp Fiction and American Beauty are far and beyond 2 of my favorite movies ever...

led_zeppelin 11-24-03 01:54 PM

Originally Posted by LordSlaytan
There isn't anything worse in American Beauty than there is in American Pie.

Yeah, but mom doesn't care if I watch American Pie. Wierd huh?

LordSlaytan 11-24-03 02:08 PM

Originally Posted by led_zeppelin
Yeah, but mom doesn't care if I watch American Pie. Wierd huh?
Ask her to watch it with you.

Garrett 11-24-03 03:57 PM

Originally Posted by LordSlaytan
Ask her to watch it with you.
That could work out well. But, it could also go wrong. It just depends on the person.

Sedai 11-24-03 05:00 PM

The Beauty...
 
When this first came out, I saw a commercial for the film and wrote it off as a cheesey teen film. My girlfriend a couple of our friends dragged me to it and I was blown away. I think everyone should watch this film from time to time to remember a couple of the points this film makes. Like one of my fav lines in the movie....

"This is not life, this is stuff!!!"

We all came out of American Beauty a little better off I think, and I believe many could get the same from this film.


Watch it, screw what Mom says....

(Do kids rebel any more these days?)

7thson 11-24-03 05:03 PM

I could understand not letting you watch these movies, however, to let you watch others that are far worse, in terms of sex, violence, etc... and not let you see these must mean they either touched a personal nerve somewhere, or she has no idea what she is talking about. Not trying to say bad things about your mom , but get real. Also if your sister is out watching "trash" maybe she should not go to any R rated movies.

Garrett 11-24-03 09:43 PM

Originally Posted by Sedai
(Do kids rebel any more these days?)
What a pathetic world it would be if they didn't.

led_zeppelin 11-24-03 09:43 PM

Originally Posted by 7thson
If your sister is out watching "trash" maybe she should not go to any R rated movies.
Exactly what I said! She just ignored me. What a b**** (my sister, not my mom. My mom kicks butt for letting me watch some of the movies I did. Like, From Dusk till' Dawn.)

blibblobblib 11-24-03 10:22 PM

Originally Posted by Sedai
"This is not life, this is stuff!!!"

We all came out of American Beauty a little better off I think, and I believe many could get the same from this film.
Thats a very good point that ive always suggested as well. American Beauty Is easily in my top 3 films. Its a funny, beautiful, philosophical and heart breaking tale of a sad man who just wants to be happy again. and in doing so he finds out so many things. Really makes me happy watching this film, i think i could go as far to say it changed my life, well at least my outlook on life. Its got so many points i think each and every one of us should consider.

"Sometimes i feel theres just so much beauty in the world, my heart will explode."

The actings excellant. The film looks excellant. And it definatly made me feel excellant.....hope it does you too :)

led_zeppelin 12-13-03 06:26 PM

I'VE SEEN PULP FICTION AND AMERICAN BEAUTY! Only mom doesn't know that. American Beauty is a great movie. I bust out laughing when ever that real-estate guy is screwing Annete Benning or whatever, and says (or yells) "Do you like getting nailed by the king?!" What a stupid thing to say in bed! Anyway, Pulp Fiction is a great movie, but I still like Reservoir Dogs better. Best part in the movie is when Phil Lammar dies in the back of the car. WOA! Didn't see that coming! Bruce Willis w/ a samuri sword is awesome too. But that whole scene was a big rip-off (or homage) to Deliverance in my opinion.

Garrett 12-13-03 06:28 PM

American Beauty was excellent.

kelandwood 01-11-13 03:47 PM

American Beauty
 
This has got to be one of the most powerful films i've ever seen. It's blend of comedy and drama is just brilliant and Kevin Spacey gives one of the best performances i've ever seen. Nothing I can say about it that hasn't already been said but sometimes there's just so much beauty in the world. What did you guys think of it.

Gabrielle947 01-11-13 04:18 PM

Re: American Beauty
 
I don't understand when parents don't allow their children to watch violent/strong language/minimal sexual content films.Like a film will make their child more violent or disturbing.These things depend on nurturing.

TheGirlWhoHadAllTheLuck x 01-12-13 02:01 PM

Originally Posted by Gabrielle947 (Post 870001)
I don't understand when parents don't allow their children to watch violent/strong language/minimal sexual content films.Like a film will make their child more violent or disturbing.These things depend on nurturing.
Parents should use their own discretion when thinking about what films to let their children see. The reason for rating films by age is that there are some films that children might either not get or would find disturbing/upsetting.

cinemaafficionado 01-18-13 12:50 AM

American Beauty is an excellent movie and Pulp Fiction one of the best movies ever made. You will probably enjoy and appreciate these movies more when you are a little bit older.

Lucas 08-02-13 09:44 PM

Re: American Beauty
 
This film is a masterpiece. Saw this one earlier this year(i'm 17 yo) and I loved it. I think I'll love it even more as I grow older.

MovieFan31 08-02-13 10:52 PM

Originally Posted by Garrett (Post 128784)
American Beauty was excellent.
An excellent movie, one which caught my eye upon VHS release years ago.

Gideon58 08-05-13 04:37 PM

I can definitely understand why, at age 14, you are not allowed to watch AMERICAN BEAUTY. This is not a film for children, the characters are deeply flawed and there is massive inappropriate beahvior, but in a few years, you should definitely put the film on your watch list. The direction by Sam Mendes is first rate and Kevin Spacey's Oscar winning performance is a knockout, as are the performances of Annette Bening and Chris Cooper.

Gideon58 02-26-14 12:21 PM

I think AMERICAN BEAUTY is brilliant...enormous re-watch appeal with spectacular performances from Kevin Spacey and Annette Bening. Lester Bernham is one of the most original creations of American cinema.

TylerS 02-27-14 12:10 PM

Re: American Beauty
 
I find this to be a very odd movie. The fact that Spacey's character likes such a younger girl sickens me a lot.

7thson 02-27-14 12:16 PM

Originally Posted by TylerS (Post 1044930)
I find this to be a very odd movie. The fact that Spacey's character likes such a younger girl sickens me a lot.
I think the fact that you do not understand the film sickens me a lot.

Just saying

moviesdekhodotin 03-05-14 01:00 AM

Re: American Beauty
 
thank god, at least no one stops me from watching these movies ;) BTW I really like American beauty ...

saimiz 03-06-14 10:02 AM

Re: American Beauty
 
I have come to see the movie with a certain prejudice. Everyone saying that it was so wonderful, so touching, so excited -- I usually tend to go with movies that nobody likes. Nevertheless, this one was a certain exception.

Bihotza 03-23-14 07:55 PM

Re: American Beauty
 
American Beauty is in my top 10 movies. I am very big on existential movies and American Beauty is one of the first cult movies I've seen.

I hate it when people talk about how this is promotes the wrong things. It's not promoting anything, it's just a very good movie.

This reminds me I need to re-watch it soon.

Mesmerized 03-23-14 09:28 PM

Originally Posted by Bihotza (Post 1060892)
I hate it when people talk about how this is promotes the wrong things.

How often do you see a movie promoting the right things?

Bihotza 03-23-14 09:31 PM

Originally Posted by Mesmerized (Post 1060992)
How often do you see a movie promoting the right things?
Rarely. That's why I disagree and think it's a stupid argument

Mesmerized 03-23-14 09:34 PM

Originally Posted by Bihotza (Post 1060997)
Rarely. That's why I disagree and think it's a stupid argument


It seems if a movie isn't selling the wrong things, it's not going to sell. I rarely see anything good coming out of Hollywood nowadays.

Stamina888 07-29-17 09:16 AM

American Beauty
 
There are so many aspects of this movie I love. It was one of those films that drew me in and never let me go until the end. I was mystified by the supernatural aura of the film, haunted by the darker elements, enamored by the stylization, entertained by the humor, touched by genuine pieces of humanity, allured by nostalgia of young love, appalled at the violence and at peace with it at all by the end of the film. Rarely has a film evoked so much genuine emotion while still feeling cohesive.

This film gets a reputation as smut by some. Is this the film where a mid-age creep dates a girl in high school? Yes. Is it also a film where two ignored people in separate walks of life have appreciation for each other? Yes. Does it tickle men's fantasies of being younger and more virile? Sure. It does go for shock value at times, but there's also depth within it that can be too easily missed. While the most apparent hook of the film is perhaps the inappropriate romance, it's not the reason of the film's acclaim. It's not about one character or one relationship, but really the circumstances of all of the characters (and how they each are relatable in their own way). Most of the cast is neglected and suffering in some way, compounded by a lack of communication.

The movie does have it's flaws:
* The extent at which gay marriage and marijuana were promoted was bold for its time, but feels like a silly attempt at shock value in hindsight that they're no longer controversial.
* Some of the characters are stereotypical: jolly gay couple, alarmist real estate mom and a a drill sargeant military father. But I'd be lying if I said they don't exist in reality.
* Sometimes it feels like a cardboard cutout advertisement for American liberal politics.

It's an anthem to the neglected teenage girl, the creepy social outcast teenage boy with a good heart and the pathetic middle-aged man who has been cut down to size. In some ways, it is very fantasy-like and was designed to give a feeling of power to people who feel helpless. However, the extent at which the makers of the film truly resonated with the viewer's emotions, thrilled them with dramatic elements and gave them bits of warmth in between the cold and sad moments truly makes it stand out as an essential film.

9.5/10

FourthWallBreak 07-29-17 09:35 AM

Re: American Beauty
 
I absolutely loved this film. I found it mesmerising and touching as well. In fact, you've put me in the mood to watch it again. I don't think I've ever seen anything with Kevin Spacey where he wasn't good at playing his role.

Dani8 07-30-17 04:44 PM

Re: American Beauty
 
I enjoyed reading your review and agree with your rating but I question your comment - a mid-age creep dates a girl in high school. I dont recall them 'dating'. He fantisised about her, she hit on him, and he rejected her is the way I recall it. Am I missing something?
Still, I really enjoyed this movie. All the characters felt pretty real to me.

Gideon58 07-30-17 05:12 PM

He fantasized about her, after Ricky Fitts ridiculed her for being pitiful and ugly, she showed up at Jane's house and ran into Lester, who fixed her a sandwich and flirted with her and having been dealt that ego shattering blow from Ricky, she decided to throw herself at Lester who was about to fulfill his fantasy when she confessed that, despite all her bragging throughout the film about being a sexual dynamo, she was really a virgin and Lester couldn't do it.

rambond 10-19-21 07:01 PM

Re: American Beauty
 
I have nothing to say other than the brilliance of this film, the premise, the story, the weird happenings of those two families , it s just a brilliant film, and kevin spacey makes it even better, superb stuff, it has to go as one of the top 3 dramas ever

John Dumbear 10-19-21 07:14 PM

At the time I saw it in the theater, it was one of my favorite films, Its still in my top fifty.

Citizen Rules 10-19-21 10:11 PM

That Times review is written by someone who loves their own voice. They're writing just to have something to say.

I found this review on American Beauty on the internet, it's a much better annalist of what the film was really about.

American Beauty (Sam Mendes 1999)

It's all about obsession...

American Beauty, it's about obsession and how it manifest itself in different people. Carolyn (Annette Bening) has gone nuts over obsessing over the 'good life'. She has a $4000 couch with Italian silk fabric, and it's ugly! But she doesn't care, she's obsessed to have it all...an in doing so she's forgotten the care free girl that she once was back in college.

Their daughter Jane (Thora Birch) is obsessed with breast augmentation, though they looked plenty big to me. She's been saving her money since she first started baby sitting, probably when she didn't even have any breast and now that's she grown she doesn't realize they've grown too. That's obsession.

Her friend Angela (Mena Suvari) is bonkers obsessed with not being ordinary. She goes to great links to make herself out as a bold, daring, sex crazed girl...and yet in the end she's a virgin who just talked real big.

Then there's the guy next door Ricky (Wes Bently) with the camera. OK he's obsessed with capturing moments of beauty on film. Even if it's a dead bird, he's obsessed to capture those fleeting moments and save them. That's why he has a wall of shelves in his room, for all those videos he's made and saved.

Then there's his dad the marine dude (Chris Cooper) he's obsessed with control and maybe obsessed with being or not being gay.

Well, what about Kevin Spacey, He doesn't seem obsessed, in fact he's utterly complaisant, a doormat with a vacant smile on his face. His highlight is jerking off in the shower. That's it, that's all he's got to look forward to. He's the only one who's not obsessed. Through his character we see how being true to one's inner self, is so much better than being obsessed about stuff that doesn't even matter.

Of course other people's obsessions effect him and that's why he's dead.

gomorra82 10-19-21 10:45 PM

Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 2246999)
That Times review is written by someone who loves their own voice. They're writing just to have something to say.

I found this review on American Beauty on the internet, it's a much better annalist of what the film was really about.
I like this explanation. Simple and objective.

Citizen Rules 10-19-21 10:48 PM

Originally Posted by gomorra82 (Post 2247002)
I like this explanation. Simple and objective.
Yeah me too🙂

matt72582 10-20-21 12:19 PM

Re: American Beauty
 
There's only a couple handfuls of movies I like from the last 40 years and this would probably be in my Top 5.



Watch it and judge for yourself. I first saw it at 17, last saw it in my 30s.

John Dumbear 10-20-21 12:51 PM

One thing that makes this different is that there is not one likable character in the whole movie. You could nitpick this by mentioning the gay couple. Only because they're screen time is so short.

A solid 9/10 and my fave of 1999, a stellar year for film.

matt72582 10-20-21 01:45 PM

Re: American Beauty
 
I actually liked Lester when he finally became a man. But I can't think of many movies I love that had no characters I liked.

Jinnistan 10-20-21 02:30 PM

Who's the King, though?

deen224 10-26-21 06:00 AM

Re: American Beauty
 
Originally Posted by gomorra82 (Post 2247002)
I like this explanation. Simple and objective.
yeah right, simple & objective

CringeFest 10-26-21 06:17 PM

They're both good but possibly over-rated. Ask sissy why she says they are trash...there is much MUCH worse.

xSookieStackhouse 10-27-21 05:32 AM

Re: American Beauty
 
gosh havent seen american beauty for long time since it first release

Iroquois 12-02-21 10:49 AM

I saw it once in what I think must have been my teens and thinking it was pretty good, but I revisited it when I was 30 and thought it was pretty insipid.

Originally Posted by gomorra82 (Post 2246997)
I am a fan of American Beauty
A review of a review


I have seen it many times, and own it on dvd.

I came across this review of American Beauty (Bottom of my post) I can just point out that it is a negative review. Now that is fine by me, people is free to have an opinion on a film. Good or Bad. That is actually one entertaining thing i do sometime, i go and check out Roger Eberts review of a film i have just seen.
Sometimes he has trashed films i really enjoyed. Some of his reviews are really funny to. High Lander The Quickening is one i think is a funny review. But i never got the feeling when reading his reviews, that he is trying to force his opinion on to me.


After reading the review of American Beauty, i just felt it was a bad review. The writer seems to be a respected one. Time write about her on their website that she was a finalist for the Pulitzer prize in criticism in 2015.

Here is a copy of her opening of the review:

“In 2019, beating up on Sam Mendes’ multi-Oscar-winning American Beauty, released roughly 20 years ago this week, is so painfully easy that it seems unfair. The Best Picture winner has fallen largely out of fashion; it rarely appears on critics’ lists of favorite movies, and its memory seems to have faded for most moviegoers, too.”

This opening makes me wonder. Actually, i am provoked. Even before she has started on the actual review, she just casually points out that basically everyone thinks it is a bad film now.


But the strange thing is that after reading the full article, i feel she was almost more interested in pointing out that the people who enjoyed the film in 99, are dumb people. At least people who fell for cheap cinematic tricks. And of course she hated the film from the first time she saw it.

It is the first article i have read from Time, so i have no idea if they are a serious site. But it almost feels like she uses propaganda techniques.


-The negative American Beauty review:
https://time.com/5679039/american-be...h-anniversary/

-Roger Eberts Review of High Lander the Quickening:
https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/h...uickening-1991
Curious as to what exactly you think constitutes "propaganda techniques" here. In any case, I think it's fair to look at the films that instantly garnered reputations as classics upon initial release and sincerely ask if those reputations are still warranted after the initial hype has died down. It's important to note how the review goes on to question whether the screenwriter's talk of living in authentic life in truly reflected in the film itself and, if so, whether it's done so with a significant amount of depth or quality. The review ends up picking apart why it's ultimately not a deep enough film to truly deserve its reputation as some kind of insightful drama about the human condition (even the "simple and objective" review Citizen Rules quoted amounts to repeating a single theme in relation to each character, which is the exact kind of superficial analysis that Zacharek derides in the review and would look bad regardless of opinion).

Originally Posted by matt72582 (Post 2247083)
I actually liked Lester when he finally became a man. But I can't think of many movies I love that had no characters I liked.
lmao what

Iroquois 12-03-21 08:59 AM

Originally Posted by gomorra82 (Post 2258366)
1
It has alot to do with how Stephanie Zacharek open this review. These two opening statements felt very cheap. Before she has even said a word about the film, she lays down some implications about what she thinks of this film. And not just her, but critics and most movie goers to.
And it just feels like a cheap technique to prep the reader for all the negative points she has made out later in the review.
If it's an anniversary piece, it makes sense to point out initial perspectives and how they may have changed (or not changed) over the past 20 years. In any case, I think this is inevitable with all Best Picture winners because that kind of award obviously begs the question as to whether or not it was the "best picture" that year (e.g. the previous year's winner, Shakespeare in Love now being mainly remembered as the film that undeservedly won over the much more popular Saving Private Ryan). I concede that it's hard to qualify what most moviegoers make of it these days (even Internet metrics like IMDb or RT are unreliable to some degree whether due to deliberate interference or simply not representing a sizeable cross-section of the population), but it's not inconceivable that there would be critics who did not give it acclaim either then or now (and even a cursory Google of other anniversary pieces of American Beauty indicate this sentiment was already in the air anyway). I mean, I was genuinely surprised when it turned up on this site's all-timer countdown a while back because I didn't think people had that much residual affection for it, but then again that could just be a matter of it having just the right number of points and votes.

- I did not paste in the point she made about the use of red elements in this film. The red door, flowers, blood splatter. These are elements she refers to as cheap cinematic techniques to come across as an artistic film. And she also referse to an interview with Ball, which is pasted in, in the first piece here:

She emphasizes to heavily on these elements in the film i feel. So this is basicaly the root of it all, why i was a little upset after reading this review. Because of all the cheap tricks she accuses Mendes of using in his film, she herself is using in her review. She hates American Beauty, and she uses cheap tricks, fals «facts» to get her point across.
Isn't this just a matter of showing your work, though? If you're going to criticise a film, you have to lead with examples taken from within the film itself and arguably from the film's creators (if you don't want to call Death of the Author, that is) as a means of determining the greater meaning of a film. I think it is fair to say that American Beauty does go broad with so much of its symbolism (not just the roses and use of red but also stuff like the plastic bag) and storytelling (the third-act mix-up that reads like something out of a sitcom).

This is what led me to use the term propaganda techniques. It just felt like the correct term to use, after reading the definition of what propaganda technique is, and how it can be used.
Now, the rest of my post is all parts from her review i pasted in. These are not the core elements she used that provoked me the most, but it is a good summary i feel to have them here.

2
«American Beauty was crafted in the most pristine and soulless way, manicured and buffed to bland tastefulness; it’s one of the most laughably square movies about the destructiveness of conformity ever made.


«Generally phenomenal actors give performances as tortured as sailors’ knots»

«Many critics adored American Beauty upon its release, and some surely stand by it today. But mostly, it appears to be one of those movies-with-a-message that people like, or say they like, because it seems like the right stance to take at the time.»

« Even when movies are not very good—despite how hard they may try to impress us with their labored artistry»

«Lester is in his early 40s and lives in a beautiful house, with a beautiful wife. But he’s not just asking himself “How did I get here?” He seems to be pushing for a way out.»

«He essentially quits the job from which he’s about to be fired anyway.»

«Still, Lester’s emptiness has no poetry, no matter how much Ball and Mendes hammer on the idea that their movie is all about the search for a meaningful life.»

« As a person who hated American Beauty upon its release, I can’t say whether people who loved it in 1999 will love it more or less today.»
I think you'd have to explain how each of these qualifies as propagandistic as opposed to merely argumentative. Much of this just reads like the kind of editorialising description one would expect from such a piece anyway. Only one of these comes across as markedly presumptuous (the one with the "movie with a message" line) and even then I question how effective that message is when you've got people in this thread saying they started to like Lester once he started "being a man".

3.
An example that suited pretty good to the text in the review:
Bandwagon:
Bandwagon and "inevitable-victory" appeals attempt to persuade the target audience to join in and take the course of action that "everyone else is taking."
Inevitable victory: invites those not already on the bandwagon to join those already on the road to certain victory. Those already or at least partially on the bandwagon are reassured that staying aboard is their best course of action. (e.g., "The debate is over. Nearly everyone who matters agrees with me.")
I get the impression that it's more a matter of how there's not much debate to really be had about it one way or the other anymore due to its status as a film that's extremely stuck in 1999 and already seems quaint in its approach to the matter of existential discontent (hence why it got called a square film about non-conformity). Compare it to something like the same year's Fight Club that's also about an office drone breaking free of his dissatisfying "perfect" life but in a way that has proven more relevant in subsequent years as it focuses on a collective of angry young men as opposed to a single middle-aged burnout.

She opens the reviewin this way. She tells us that most people already agree with her,
« most people, critics» She bases her opinion in the review on half truths and assumptions.

Even though it can be both the truth and a lie, her opening statement that : the movie have faded for most moviegoers is at best a halftruth. In the same line she points out that it rearly appears on critics’ lists of favorit movies. This is probably the truth.
But if a film does not end up on critics top 50 list, maby even top 100, is that an indication that it bad film? What is she implying with her statement?
As noted, I agree that it's hard to properly quantity that one way or the other. I think the implication regarding critic lists is that they are better at qualifying its worth as a film (subjectively speaking, of course) - after all, just because mass audiences like a film does not guarantee that it is a great work of art either.

It is a little funny comparing the elements used in the text to different propaganda elements
On this we can agree.

KeyserCorleone 12-08-21 12:35 PM

Originally Posted by led_zeppelin (Post 124592)
I just want to know if this movie is good. I'm only 14, but the ONLY movies I'm not allowed to watch are Pulp Fiction and American Beauty. I have been able to watch ANY movie i wanted except for these two. My sister has convinced my mom that these are trash, yet they are both highly acclaimed. So, tell me about it. Like I said, I used the search function, but I didn't find a thread about this.

American Beauty is the single weirdest drama movie I've ever seen. I wouldn't play it for my 14-year-old. Definitely 17-18, but not 14. Hell, I saw it when I was 25 and... there's a lot about that movie that's just so... off.

Sorry I can't defend you. But I'd say wait on that and Pulp Fiction. Both kovies might have been really heavy hitters for me when I was your age. Didn't even see Pulp Fiction until my early 20's.

As you know, Pulp Fiction is practically unanimously acclaimed, but the wait is worth it. American Beauty is a case of mostly love but justified hate due to its absurd behavior.

Iroquois 12-09-21 02:13 AM

Re: American Beauty
 
OP is from 2003, I daresay there's no need to wait at this point.


All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:59 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums