Over population and how it will be the end of us
Anyone correct me if I'm wrong but I think it's Chinese women who are only allowed to have two children maximum. I don't think anyone needs to increase their numbers rather I would prefer if everyone follows The two kids maximum rule. In fact what ever the statistics are on how many people die every year should be equalised on the amount of kids being born but that's too idealistic.
What would be better is the two kids maximum rule, The world is becoming dangerously over populated as it is. The way I see it when you go to the zoo you're only see about seven lions in an enclosure any more than that will be unhealthy for the Lions. Just think about if World War I World War II Vietnam Pakistan and all wars never happened if the bubonic plague never happened too. The world would be so over populated that there would be no room for countrysides. But if we don't do the two kids rule now one day it will be too late and war or random selection might be are only options. This planet like it or not is one big enclosure Just maybe the illuminati Control of the music industry and make it so all the role models are kids look up to are corrupt and advertise a lifestyle that is unhealthy, advertising sex drugs greed and subliminal messaging The population with a collection of unhealthy habits. America has long fantasised with the idea of dying young or being part of the 27th club like Heath ledger Kurt Cobain or Jimi Hendrix. Young people can't get enough of tragic tells of river Phoenix or James Dean or Marilyn Monroe. Not to say these people didn't earn there fame but their lives seem to be enhanced and romanticised because they died young. People everywhere flirt with the idea of dying Young at least once in their lives. Much like Jim Morrison who was infatuated with the idea. What is it about the idea that is so appealing maybe it's the world we live in, an over populated world where people scream to be unique amongst a sea of similarity. it's a tragic state of affairs that has grown enormously since the 20th century. But it's not just the saying better to burn out than fade away it's become more than that in the soul crushing world of social media where young people all around the world are becoming more and more antisocial. Now imagine if the illuminati subliminal message people with a collection of unhealthy lifestyles for a reason? imagine if it is the illuminati that push our fascination towards dying young. That keeps us addicted to social media using our need for human connection and substituting it for dating websites and porn. But you might ask yourselves what would the illuminati get out of this?? well maybe the illuminati know as well as I do that over population will be man's downfall. That that will be the thing that will ultimately destroys us in the end. Unhealthy things are constantly sold to us such as sex drugs and alcohol but what if the illuminates Ultimate goal is to sell suicide and that their subliminal messaging of a destructive and unhealthy lifestyle is made to play on man's weaknesses and ultimately to reduce the population to its once utopian state. If that's there idea I would be against it. But watching this scene from war of the planet of the apes makes me think otherwise. As there are hardly any frontiers to conquer anymore everything seems to be used up and polluted. There Is something more genuine rewarding and beautiful about returning to a more basic world a world is more calm peaceful, in other words utopia https://youtu.be/xUy3xWXxcj0 |
I read recently that the fashion industry is the third most environmentally destructive industry on the planet. Let that sink in. Deforestation and agriculture as well are often undermined in these contexts, even if pollution remains the biggest issue of them all. Interesting topic, thanks for posting.
|
We are not even remotely in danger of overpopulation right now, and most people claiming otherwise are merely imagining lots of new people, without a corresponding ability to imagine what they might do.
Case in point: your post doesn't actually contain any facts or data supporting the idea. It just sort of assumes it, then spends a half dozen paragraphs speculating about what we should do. |
Re: Over population and how it will be the end of us
Did this need to be it's own thread? That's what was being discussed in the other one and it was clearly related to the main topic, plus you just copy and pasted your post and added a few paragraphs.
|
Re: Over population and how it will be the end of us
AI is gonna get us all before overpopulation comes into it.
|
Originally Posted by Bunker Wise (Post 1867529)
America has long fantasised with the idea of dying young or being part of the 27th club like Heath ledger Kurt Cobain or Jimi Hendrix.
|
Re: Over population and how it will be the end of us
Have you guys seen Bunker Wise's profile banner? I just seen it for the first time. Good grief!
|
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 1867555)
Have you guys seen Bunker Wise's profile banner? I just seen it for the first time. Good grief!
Warning dictator below if you engage with this individual don't bring up or say the following ???
:-) I didn't really like the last Jedi ^ Banned :-) I can't wait to introduce my partner to this website ^ Banned :-) I just happen to disagree with the minority decision on this topic ^ Banned |
Originally Posted by gandalf26 (Post 1867546)
AI is gonna get us all before overpopulation comes into it.
First problem the world ought to fix is a way to differentiate between capital "i" and lowercase "l". ;) |
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 1867555)
Have you guys seen Bunker Wise's profile banner? I just seen it for the first time. Good grief!
Although it's fiction, the projected parts about overpopulation will scare the pants off anyone. Too bad the movie COMPLETELY changed the end from the book - rendering the movie a nice production that is a total waste by changing the ending. No offense to Tom Hanks and company, but it's one of THE WORST book to movie adaptations ever for that one reason alone (since most the movie follows the book pretty closely). Oh, if only there was a solution for the world as in Inferno (the book not the movie). |
Originally Posted by Captain Steel (Post 1867562)
I wonder if Bunker Wise read the book Inferno by Dan Brown?
Although it's fiction, the projected parts about overpopulation will scare the pants off anyone. Too bad the movie COMPLETELY changed the end from the book - rendering the movie a nice production that is a total waste by changing the ending. No offense to Tom Hanks and company, but it's one of THE WORST book to movie adaptations ever for that one reason alone (since most the movie follows the book pretty closely). Oh, if only there was a solution for the world as in Inferno (the book not the movie). |
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 1867555)
Have you guys seen Bunker Wise's profile banner? I just seen it for the first time. Good grief!
I was wondering why his OP was so...so Emo! |
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 1867565)
Inferno the movie is about over population? I didn't know that, I thought it was one of those Da Vinci Code sequels. I seen the first one and that was enough.
Angels & Demons and The Davinci Code are the only two I have seen. I have read the book "The Davinci Code" as an ex-co-worker kept recommending it to me as it dealt with the Divine Feminine. Perhaps its a book @Mr Minio should read! |
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 1867565)
Inferno the movie is about over population? I didn't know that, I thought it was one of those Da Vinci Code sequels. I seen the first one and that was enough.
Without spoilers, the book Inferno is much the same running around and sorting out of clues while escaping villains like the other Da Vinci Code books, but the clincher is in the ending (which the movie changes - imagine, if you will, that they just eliminated the ending of The Sixth Sense - you'd wonder what the point of the movie was - that's what they did with the Inferno movie). Part of the plot is that the "villain" apparently has a "solution" for overpopulation. |
Re: Over population and how it will be the end of us
I read Inferno but dont really remember much about it.
|
Originally Posted by Captain Steel (Post 1867590)
Yes, same author (Dan Brown) and same character - what have now become known as the "Robert Langdon mysteries" or "thrillers" - that's the part Tom Hanks plays in the movies (kind of an Indiana Jones type, but whereas Jones is an archaeology professor, Langdon is a professor of religious iconology and "symbology.")
Without spoilers, the book Inferno is much the same running around and sorting out of clues while escaping villains like the other Da Vinci Code books, but the clincher is in the ending (which the movie changes - imagine, if you will, that they just eliminated the ending of The Sixth Sense - you'd wonder what the point of the movie was - that's what they did with the Inferno movie). Part of the plot is that the "villain" apparently has a "solution" for overpopulation. |
Originally Posted by MovieGal (Post 1867588)
Angels & Demons, The Davinci Code and Inferno are all Dan Brown books and deal with symbolism and religion. Each hold its own story, however the main character is the same.
Angels & Demons and The Davinci Code are the only two I have seen. I have read the book "The Davinci Code" as an ex-co-worker kept recommending it to me as it dealt with the Divine Feminine. Perhaps its a book @Mr Minio should read! One Dan Brown book I really liked (that I thought WOULD make a good movie) was Deception Point which is one of the few that are NOT part of the Langdon series. It's kind of a science fiction (but then it's a bit deceiving, as alluded to by the title). |
Originally Posted by MovieGal (Post 1867595)
B*tchslaps @Captain Steel
|
Originally Posted by Captain Steel (Post 1867597)
All the books are so detailed that they don't end up translating well to movies - you'd need like a 10 hour movie to do them justice.
One Dan Brown book I really liked (that I thought WOULD make a good movie) was Deception Point which is one of the few that are NOT part of the Langdon series. It's kind of a science fiction (but then it's a bit deceiving, as alluded to by the title). I have many books that talk about the Divine Feminine and The Messianic Marriage and the Illuminati and such... I'm a woman who believes every woman is a Goddess but as far as the rest... Not so much into the Illuminati and such. Plus, Im not a christian. |
Originally Posted by Captain Steel (Post 1867597)
All the books are so detailed that they don't end up translating well to movies - you'd need like a 10 hour movie to do them justice.
I don't believe I remember if you're a fan of Dune the novel? or Dune (1984)? |
Originally Posted by Captain Steel (Post 1867598)
Is it for spoilers or the simultaneous post about Rule's question?
|
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 1867600)
I say that all the time too. You just can't cram a large concept novel into a two hour movie. That's what David Lynch did with Dune and why most don't like it. Though I do.
I don't believe I remember if you're a fan of Dune the novel? or Dune (1984)? I read "Willow" before it came out. Both were enjoyable I read "Bless This Child" before the movie came out.. was so upset over how they changed the movie from the book. |
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 1867600)
I say that all the time too. You just can't cram a large concept novel into a two hour movie. That's what David Lynch did with Dune and why most don't like it. Though I do.
I don't believe I remember if you're a fan of Dune the novel? or Dune (1984)? Oh, and I also remember talking to you about that documentary Jodorowsky's Dune! |
Originally Posted by Bunker Wise (Post 1867529)
Anyone correct me if I'm wrong but I think it's Chinese women who are only allowed to have two children maximum. I don't think anyone needs to increase their numbers rather I would prefer if everyone follows The two kids maximum rule. In fact what ever the statistics are on how many people die every year should be equalised on the amount of kids being born but that's too idealistic.
What would be better is the two kids maximum rule, The world is becoming dangerously over populated as it is. The way I see it when you go to the zoo you're only see about seven lions in an enclosure any more than that will be unhealthy for the Lions. Just think about if World War I World War II Vietnam Pakistan and all wars never happened if the bubonic plague never happened too. The world would be so over populated that there would be no room for countrysides. But if we don't do the two kids rule now one day it will be too late and war or random selection might be are only options. This planet like it or not is one big enclosure Just maybe the illuminati Control of the music industry and make it so all the role models are kids look up to are corrupt and advertise a lifestyle that is unhealthy, advertising sex drugs greed and subliminal messaging The population with a collection of unhealthy habits. America has long fantasised with the idea of dying young or being part of the 27th club like Heath ledger Kurt Cobain or Jimi Hendrix. Young people can't get enough of tragic tells of river Phoenix or James Dean or Marilyn Monroe. Not to say these people didn't earn there fame but their lives seem to be enhanced and romanticised because they died young. People everywhere flirt with the idea of dying Young at least once in their lives. Much like Jim Morrison who was infatuated with the idea. What is it about the idea that is so appealing maybe it's the world we live in, an over populated world where people scream to be unique amongst a sea of similarity. it's a tragic state of affairs that has grown enormously since the 20th century. But it's not just the saying better to burn out than fade away it's become more than that in the soul crushing world of social media where young people all around the world are becoming more and more antisocial. Now imagine if the illuminati subliminal message people with a collection of unhealthy lifestyles for a reason? imagine if it is the illuminati that push our fascination towards dying young. That keeps us addicted to social media using our need for human connection and substituting it for dating websites and porn. But you might ask yourselves what would the illuminati get out of this?? well maybe the illuminati know as well as I do that over population will be man's downfall. That that will be the thing that will ultimately destroys us in the end. Unhealthy things are constantly sold to us such as sex drugs and alcohol but what if the illuminates Ultimate goal is to sell suicide and that their subliminal messaging of a destructive and unhealthy lifestyle is made to play on man's weaknesses and ultimately to reduce the population to its once utopian state. If that's there idea I would be against it. But watching this scene from war of the planet of the apes makes me think otherwise. As there are hardly any frontiers to conquer anymore everything seems to be used up and polluted. There Is something more genuine rewarding and beautiful about returning to a more basic world a world is more calm peaceful, in other words utopia https://youtu.be/xUy3xWXxcj0 |
Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 1867544)
We are not even remotely in danger of overpopulation right now, and most people claiming otherwise are merely imagining lots of new people, without a corresponding ability to imagine what they might do.
Case in point: your post doesn't actually contain any facts or data supporting the idea. It just sort of assumes it, then spends a half dozen paragraphs speculating about what we should do. |
Originally Posted by Camo (Post 1867545)
Did this need to be it's own thread? That's what was being discussed in the other one and it was clearly related to the main topic, plus you just copy and pasted your post and added a few paragraphs.
|
Originally Posted by Camo (Post 1867560)
Jesus. Also in his profile comments above one from Yoda:
Shades of Des in the grudge holding...also the overpopulation talk. Anyway what did Yoda do to annoy Des maybe I oughta reach out to the guy looks like I'm not the only one who was inconvenienced and silenced by the hands of a crooked administrator. But yodels, sorry Yoders thread suggesting new rules for topics is his way of trying to contain the minds of more diverse and creative thinkers, or anyone who thinks outside the box. I think Yoda should pass on the administrating title to someone better suited to run a movie forum. Also when he finished his new rules on conversational topics thread, you would think he would be curious to hear the opinions of his subjects but he closed the thread. Discouraging people of opinion. Sounds awful like dictatorship to me. But hey I'm just a humble narrator. |
Originally Posted by Bunker Wise (Post 1867529)
Anyone correct me if I'm wrong but I think it's Chinese women who are only allowed to have two children maximum
|
Re: Over population and how it will be the end of us
I read the OP in Alex Jones' voice.
|
Originally Posted by Bunker Wise (Post 1867657)
Anyway what did Yoda do to annoy Des maybe I oughta reach out to the guy looks like I'm not the only one who was inconvenienced and silenced by the hands of a crooked administrator. |
Originally Posted by Dani8 (Post 1867676)
So who else was inconvenienced? Yoda, are you aware you need a spinal adjustment from a decent chiropractor?
And I take this opportunity to say let's take our disagreements and put them behind us. We are not enemies but friends we must not be enemies, though passion may have strained it must not break our bond is affection. Let us give way to the better Angels of our nature |
I never saw the banning, dude. It's non of my business. All I know is you could do well with having a lil chat to Dale Carnegie. Your manners leave a lot to be desired.
|
Re: Over population and how it will be the end of us
Originally Posted by Bunker Wise (Post 1867657)
But yodels, sorry Yoders thread suggesting new rules for topics is his way of trying to contain the minds of more diverse and creative thinkers, or anyone who thinks outside the box. I think Yoda should pass on the administrating title to someone better suited to run a movie forum.
Also when he finished his new rules on conversational topics thread, you would think he would be curious to hear the opinions of his subjects but he closed the thread. Discouraging people of opinion. Sounds awful like dictatorship to me. But hey I'm just a humble narrator. Also, not sure where your swbse of entitlement is coming from, but this site BELONGS to Yoda. Essentially, you are in his lounge, that he threw open to the public as long as they can just respect a few rules. He is not being paid for this. He doesn't beed to "hand over administration". It isn't the only site with forums for movies, so if this privately owned internet space doesn't meet with your requirements, you should perhaps peruse other pastures. Hope this helps. |
Originally Posted by Captain Steel (Post 1867561)
Is that "Al" as in "Albert" or "A.I." as in "Artificial Intelligence"?
First problem the world ought to fix is a way to differentiate between capital "i" and lowercase "l". ;) |
Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 1867544)
We are not even remotely in danger of overpopulation right now,
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Bunker Wise (Post 1867649)
I'm speculating a possible future It's meant to be thought provoking ;) shame the concept is clearly lost on you.
Originally Posted by Bunker Wise (Post 1867657)
sorry Yoders thread suggesting new rules for topics is his way of trying to contain the minds of more diverse and creative thinkers, or anyone who thinks outside the box.
it's been proven by scientists that every day brain cells die and are replaced by new ones. Eventually to the point where none of your brain cells are the same as they were when you were younger. So the brain cells I had when I was a toddler have all been replaced by now I might as well have died and been reborn. So when you show me comments I wrote a long time ago. you're pretty much showing it to different man.
Originally Posted by Bunker Wise (Post 1867657)
I think Yoda should pass on the administrating title to someone better suited to run a movie forum.
|
Originally Posted by Bunker Wise (Post 1867657)
But yodels, sorry Yoders thread suggesting new rules for topics is his way of trying to contain the minds of more diverse and creative thinkers, or anyone who thinks outside the box. I think Yoda should pass on the administrating title to someone better suited to run a movie forum.
Also when he finished his new rules on conversational topics thread, you would think he would be curious to hear the opinions of his subjects but he closed the thread. Discouraging people of opinion. Sounds awful like dictatorship to me. But hey I'm just a humble narrator. |
Re: Over population and how it will be the end of us
It would certainly help this site's overpopulation problem.
|
Originally Posted by Bunker Wise (Post 1867649)
I'm speculating a possible future It's meant to be thought provoking ;)
Originally Posted by Bunker Wise (Post 1867649)
shame the concept is clearly lost on you.
You're really bad at these little jabs, by the way. They almost never even make sense. |
Originally Posted by Bunker Wise (Post 1867657)
I'm sorry I had a large bowl of chilly that day and I can't remember posting that.
Originally Posted by Bunker Wise (Post 1867657)
Anyway what did Yoda do to annoy Des maybe I oughta reach out to the guy looks like I'm not the only one who was inconvenienced and silenced by the hands of a crooked administrator.
But yodels, sorry Yoders thread suggesting new rules for topics is his way of trying to contain the minds of more diverse and creative thinkers, or anyone who thinks outside the box. I think Yoda should pass on the administrating title to someone better suited to run a movie forum. People are actually allowed to say stuff like this about me. Others have done it and not been banned, and you did it recently and weren't banned then, too (though I'm sure you've already conveniently forgotten that). But only if they take the accusation seriously--which they would if they actually meant it. You obviously are not, since I replied to this stuff before, explained why it was nonsense, and you said nothing. Yet here you are repeating it again mindlessly. You can call me "crooked" or a "dictator" if you want, and I'm going to prove it wrong by calmly explaining why it doesn't make sense. And apparently you're going to prove me right by refusing to have the conversation and merely repeating the accusations. Either way, fine by me: either you have the discussion like an adult, which a dictator wouldn't, or you refuse to, in which case banning you isn't a dictatorial decision. Your move, dude. |
Re: Over population and how it will be the end of us
Actually, I'd like to thank Bunker for helping me articulate a rule.
You know how some teachers will say if you get a text in class you have to read it in front of everyone, or something like that? That's the new rule on calling me a dictator/tyrant/corrupt/whatever. You can say it, but you have to stand up in front of everyone and defend it. You make your case, I make mine. Take it seriously and you won't be banned. If you refuse to stand up and defend it, and just repeat it when you need to take the heat off of something else you did, then it was obviously just a desperate ploy. Now, back to the thread topic, if anyone cares to actually discuss it after the OP almost immediately retconned it into "speculation." |
Originally Posted by Bunker Wise (Post 1867657)
a crooked administrator.
. I have known Yoda for almost 5 years and he has been fair 99.8%. The only other 0.2% is that I feel if 2 or more argue and wont stop..all should be banned who are involved but this is not MY forum..its his. |
Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 1867734)
Aaaand you're banned again. A week, and the next one's permanent. You have the patience of the Dalai Lama, Yoda. Get that realignment STAT! No dont. I think it was the chiropractor who put me into hospital last year, and there was nothing wrong with my vertebral subluxation complex. It was doing just fine. Stay away from those bone crunchers. |
Originally Posted by Dani8 (Post 1867789)
He's been goading you since I first noticed he was even on this board, which was 6 weeks prior to xmas. And I know this because I remember exactly where I ws at the time he started up. And he seems obsessed with Des because he's been bringing his name up since then as well. Curiouser and curiouser.
You have the patience of the Dalai Lama, Yoda. Get that realignment STAT! No dont. I think it was the chiropractor who put me into hospital last year, and there was nothing wrong with my vertebral subluxation complex. It was doing just fine. Stay away from those bone crunchers. |
Originally Posted by Captain Steel (Post 1867809)
I hope Yoda appreciates all your help!
|
Originally Posted by Bunker Wise (Post 1867657)
Anyway what did Yoda do to annoy Des maybe I oughta reach out to the guy looks like I'm not the only one who was inconvenienced and silenced by the hands of a crooked administrator.
I think Yoda should pass on the administrating title to someone better suited to run a movie forum.
|
Originally Posted by Stirchley (Post 1867917)
Shouldn’t be too hard as I think you may be one & the same person.
Like Steve maybe? |
Re: Over population and how it will be the end of us
It's a reference to the joke in my signature. Remember that whole alter ego bit?
|
Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 1867943)
It's a reference to the joke in my signature. Remember that whole alter ego bit?
|
Re: Over population and how it will be the end of us
Signatures are only on the person's first post on each page.
But you can see them on their profiles, anyway. |
Re: Over population and how it will be the end of us
No, cant see it on your profile:bawling:
It's OK. I'm sure I'll survive. I just find it fascinating that someone who obviously dislikes a forum owner so much would keep coming back to his/her place on the net. Why not find a forum owned by someone he likes and gets on with. Makes absolutely no sense to me. |
Originally Posted by Dani8 (Post 1867946)
No, cant see it on your profile:bawling:
|
Originally Posted by Miss Vicky (Post 1867951)
Go to his profile and then click "About."
So, be kind to an old luddite, what's the joke about Steve? |
Originally Posted by Dani8 (Post 1867942)
Who was Steve? I cant keep track of all the alts.
|
Originally Posted by Stirchley (Post 1867956)
Remember when Spookiemoviemania brought up all that stuff about Dannii in the Shoutbox? How she was dissed here, etc., etc. For some reason Spookie thought @Yoda’s real name was Steve rather than Chris so he kept referring to him as Steve in his Shoutbox comments. (No doubt Dannii put him up to airing her grievances in the Shoutbox. :rolleyes:)
Ohhh it's all coming back to me now. Bingo! Thanks very much, Stirchley. yeah I wonder if she also put spookie up to me being an elderly 'attention whore' wearing a hat on the beach in my facebook avatar as well. My facebook avatar isnt of an elderly woman wearing a hat. It's of a bird - of the feathered variety. That attention whore wanting it's photo taken! I'm not sure if it's elderly though. I forgot to ask. And it's not very sun smart because it wasnt wearing a hat. |
Re: Over population and how it will be the end of us
I was gonna say something like "okay, back on topic," but I don't think so much as a single person has expressed interest in discussing this, so nevermind. ;)
|
Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 1867962)
I was gonna say something like "okay, back on topic," but I don't think so much as a single person has expressed interest in discussing this, so nevermind. ;)
|
Re: Over population and how it will be the end of us
LOL!!! Yeah Steve. Just sit there and behave yourself.
|
Originally Posted by Dani8 (Post 1867879)
What help? What on earth is your implication? Dont you have something more important to do?
Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 1867744)
Actually, I'd like to thank Bunker for helping me articulate a rule.
You know how some teachers will say if you get a text in class you have to read it in front of everyone, or something like that? That's the new rule on calling me a dictator/tyrant/corrupt/whatever. **** |
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Captain Steel (Post 1868163)
Clearly this makes Yoda a Tsar. |
Re: Over population and how it will be the end of us
|
Originally Posted by Omnizoa (Post 1868161)
Captain Steel clearly means to undermine the forum.
I have proof positive that Yoda is a grand authoritarian, behold: **** Well if he thinks he has any chance of undermining this forum via me then good luck to him. Cap E. Ville. Might occupy him a bit. |
Originally Posted by Dani8 (Post 1868187)
Hello Omni. How are you?
|
Originally Posted by Omnizoa (Post 1868196)
I am ketchup, how are you?
|
Originally Posted by Dani8 (Post 1868209)
Oh you saucy thing, you! You should have been here a few days ago. I missed you and your shenanigans!
|
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:16 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums