90sAce

Again, that doesn't jibe with what I'm seeing. Usually it's the exact opposite: you add arguments after the fact. Just now you replied with basically three words and then edited the entire post in afterwards. Why? What purpose could that serve.

Also, you're supposed to post replies to my profile rather than yours (this last one was on yours). Otherwise I get no notification that you've responded.

Things get easily mis-interpreted online, I usually proofread a post and edit it to better convey its intended message - I didn't say I only edited posts for typos; I mentioned that I edit it if I don't like the wording - meaning if it sounds too long-winded/or had excessive elaboration then I edit it to get the point across better

Are you going to say anything in response to this? I know for a fact it's not just due to typos. And you just did it again, responding to someone in the Internet/culture thread with a simple dismissal, before editing in the entire post. I can't for the life of me figure out what you're doing, or why.

That's not quite true--I've spotted several instances where you added entirely new arguments, or expounded on existing ones significantly.