0
gimme a break. would'nt it make more sense to watch it yourself and figure out how it is before talking about any award shows?
for me, i dunno exactly what it would take, but i have some definite preferences. it might be silent, have buster keaton in it, feature some good stunts, a pretty silent actress with nice gams, go minimal on the schmaltzy romance, be kind of weird, a nice sardonic sense of humor and style, and have lots of original -preferably surreal- gags.
either that or it might be long, slow, possibly asian [though not necessarily], have just enough ambiguity to keep me questioning [going back for more], not have too much music, again minimal on the schmaltz, have a mature, depressing humanist world view [will eisner-esque], and have a nice mixture of emotional distance and engagement.
or it might be animated [though not heavy on cg, if at all it should be totally unintrusive], feature a weird sound track, be weird looking [for example i like cartoons with giant insects and weird looking robots [this includes to a limited extent certain anime mecha of the gundam ilk, but more specifically i'm thinking along less generically stylized lines, like for example giant robo, the iron giant, laputa, superman: mechanical monsters...] -- possibly insect-like robots], and lots of action [i like seeing insects and robots fight].
damn, i'm trying to be as specific as possible, but different areas of specific interest keep popping up. i kind of prefer these kinds of criteria for chosing new films to check out. what about you? what kinds of weird criteria, or "film fetishes" cause you guys to go bananas [to the beat] [besides -- nah, i guess how many oscars it has won can be a sort of criteria].