Movie Tab II

Tools    





The Time Machine (George Pal, 1960)


Thousands of centuries in the future, H.G. Wells (Rod Taylor) and docile young Eloi Yvette Mimieux listen to the talking rings give a history lesson.



Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.
I watched the first part of it, but I fell asleep. I've seen it a few times and give it
+ .
__________________
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts. - John Wooden
My IMDb page



Leviathan (Zvyagintsev,2014)

Leviathan is perhaps the most poignant at modern Russian life seen in film today. The film has more than one conflict, but it begins with that of Kolya, a hothead landowner, and corrupt mayor Vadim who's trying to take this property away from him. The film criticizes Russian culture, but more importantly the corruption in the bureaucratic society. While the laws cited in some court room scenes may sound just like the US Constitution, it soon becomes clear that very little of the legal process is followed by those on top.

While the film is set in a smaller town, I do believe the statement by the director is corruption throughout the nation. There's a very strong scene, when many of the protagonist go out shooting- the targets are framed images of former Russian dictators. One character asks is there anyone more modern, in reply another character states that we will let history reflect on those. But Zvyagintsev has a bit of a different statement, in one scene there's a portrait of Vladimir Putin standing right behind Vadim in his office. I see this as Zvyagintsev pointing the corruption all the way to the top.

Which is interesting since 35% of the films funding is from the Russian minsitry of culture. But they themselves have had a change of heart.

From Wiki
Vladimir Medinsky, Minister of Culture, acknowledged that the film showed talented moviemaking but said he does not like it. He sharply criticized its portrayal of ordinary Russians as vodka-swigging and foul-mouthed, which he does not recognize from his experience. He thought it strange that there is not a single positive character in the movie, implying that the director was not fond of Russians but rather “fame, red carpets and statuettes."

He has proposed guidelines which would ban movies which defile national culture.


The films conflict later does focus more on the personal life of Kolya, but the aspect of the mayor and his corruption is always looming in the background. The movie could have ended more powerfully, but suddenly, in the final court room scene. Zooming into the all so familiar prosecutor. While I didn't find this part shocking, I found it hardening. Instead the film has a strong in a Russian Orthodox Church. Which is also brutally criticized by the film.

The film ends in the same scenery and with the same music as when it began. Raising the question, have things changed? And will they ever?

-


Other Viewings:

Ida (Pawlikowski, 2013)-

[REWATCH] Bronson (Refn, 2008)-

Annabelle (Leonetti, 2014)-
-
The Stepfather (Ruben, 1987)-

__________________
Yeah, there's no body mutilation in it



Face to Face (1976) - Ingmar Bergman

-

The ABCs of Death (2012) - 26 different directors

+

The Red Shoes (1948) - Michael Powell/Emeric Pressburger



The Day the Earth Stood Still (2008) - Scott Derickson



The Expendables (2010) - Sylvester Stallone



Planet of the Apes (1968) - Franklin J Schaffner

+

Election (2005) - Johnnie To



Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery (1997) - Jay Roach



Zoolander (2001) - Ben Stiller

-

Red State (2011) - Kevin Smith

-

Stanley & Livingstone (1939) - Henry King/Otto Brower

+

Triad Election (2006) - Johnnie To



Wolf Children (2012) - Mamoru Hosoda




Medium level "American Sniper" spoilers below guys

American Sniper (2014) - Not really a big fan of Clint Eastwood when he's in directors chair. Can't really explain myself why I didn't like this film, I just didn't. It felt a bit "scattered" story-wise because at first it portrays Chris as a cowboy and then he sees an act of terrorism on TV and just heads straight to the army (to be honest,I thought that scene was pathetic..). Is that related? Being a cowboy and a patriot? Well, lets say it is, I don't really know much about American culture. Lets say it's a patriotic movie.
Then the story moves towards the family and conflict arises as to whether Chris should protect his country (being the best sniper) or should he look after his own nest? Yes, great conflict and I thought it was delivered quite well because film didn't choose sides. It portrayed war as a patriotic act when we see Chris saving his fellow soldiers and then at the same time it tried to show that family is suffering without a husband when we see his wife worrying about Chris being in the battlefield (even when he's home). Loved the scenes when Chris related drill noises or the dog playing to the war, great idea and the best part of the whole film for me perfectly illustrating how war leaves never healing scars in you. Could've been a little more subtle though.
But after building Chris as a tough soldier the film suddenly turns around and kind of tries to prove that family is more important. Chris rehabilitated himself, left war and started a normal family life - he did what about 1 hour back to the film he said he would never do. Where was that breaking point that made him change? And the very end was just even more puzzling. Seriously, I don't get this story.
There were other things that disturbed me - repetative "war-home-war" sequences, catching one specific bad guy kind of felt like they're trying to make it an action film now, Bradley Cooper's acting wasn't really that good (huge praise for the weight gain though!).
Just felt like the film was constantly drifting away.


Inherent Vice (2014) - went to see it not really hoping much as PTA never made an absolutely perfect film for my tastes (TWBB comes very close though) but I do like this director and I respect his different style and approach to films. What I also like about him is that his films are completely different yet he somehow manages to leave his signature in it.
Anyway, with no expectations ended up really enjoying the film, this is the type of movie where good story meets amazing culture recreation. This time it was 70s dope fiends with a bit of crime spice. I liked the story and the characters, loved the portrayal of the 70s. However, I did think it was a bit dragging and slow at some scenes and sometimes maybe just a little bit over the top.I read some reviews that people find the plot too complicated but I think that was the point of the film - to make everything so "wtf" not only plot but also music/costume/character wise so the viewer could kind of get into Doc's shoes and see the world the way he sees. Seriously, it's like watching a film when you're high except you're not.
__________________
"Anything less than immortality is a complete waste of time."



Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.

The Golem (Carl Boese & Paul Wegener, 1920)

The Dallas Buyers Club (Jean-Marc Vallée, 2013)

Never Die Alone (Ernest R. Dickerson, 2004)

The World’s Greatest Dad (Bobcat Goldthwait, 2009)
-

Teacher Robin Williams worries that his son Daryl Sabara has no friends, hates everything and spends all his time watching internet porn.
Atlantic City Hookers: It Ain't E-Z Being a Ho' (Brent Owens, 2004)

The Insider (Michael Mann, 1999)
+
The Hills Have Eyes (Alexandre Aja, 2006)

ˇQue Viva Mexico! (Sergei M. Eisenstein, 1932/79)


Eisenstein wanted to work in the U.S. and Mexico in the early ‘30s but found the political climate better in the south where he made this poetic exploration of the country and its natural love for revolution.
The Black Hole (Gary Nelson, 1979)
+
Leap Year (Anand Tucker, 2010)
+
Flicka (Michael Mayer, 2006)
-
Paint Your Wagon (Joshua Logan, 1969)


Miners Clint Eastwood and Lee Marvin team up to share wife Jean Seberg during the California Gold Rush.
Halloween (Rob Zombie, 2007)

The Rainmaker (Francis Ford Coppola, 1997)

Corpo Celeste (Alice Rohrwacher, 2011)

The Fighter (David O. Russell, 2010)


Dicky (Christian Bale) kicks his crack habit long enough to aid his brother, boxer Micky Ward (Mark Wahlberg), in his unlikely quest for the title.
The November Man (Roger Donaldson, 2014)

Lake Tahoe (Fernando Eimbcke, 2008)

School Daze (Spike Lee, 1988)

Superman/Batman: Apocalypse (Lauren Montgomery, 2010)



Batman and Superman agree that it seems to be Wonder Woman’s time of the month. Later, Superman takes on the evil Darkseid.



Medium level "American Sniper" spoilers below guys

American Sniper (2014) - Not really a big fan of Clint Eastwood when he's in directors chair. Can't really explain myself why I didn't like this film, I just didn't. It felt a bit "scattered" story-wise because at first it portrays Chris as a cowboy and then he sees an act of terrorism on TV and just heads straight to the army (to be honest,I thought that scene was pathetic..). Is that related? Being a cowboy and a patriot? Well, lets say it is, I don't really know much about American culture. Lets say it's a patriotic movie.
Then the story moves towards the family and conflict arises as to whether Chris should protect his country (being the best sniper) or should he look after his own nest? Yes, great conflict and I thought it was delivered quite well because film didn't choose sides. It portrayed war as a patriotic act when we see Chris saving his fellow soldiers and then at the same time it tried to show that family is suffering without a husband when we see his wife worrying about Chris being in the battlefield (even when he's home). Loved the scenes when Chris related drill noises or the dog playing to the war, great idea and the best part of the whole film for me perfectly illustrating how war leaves never healing scars in you. Could've been a little more subtle though.
But after building Chris as a tough soldier the film suddenly turns around and kind of tries to prove that family is more important. Chris rehabilitated himself, left war and started a normal family life - he did what about 1 hour back to the film he said he would never do. Where was that breaking point that made him change? And the very end was just even more puzzling. Seriously, I don't get this story.
There were other things that disturbed me - repetative "war-home-war" sequences, catching one specific bad guy kind of felt like they're trying to make it an action film now, Bradley Cooper's acting wasn't really that good (huge praise for the weight gain though!).
Just felt like the film was constantly drifting away.
why this film is getting nominated for Best Picture over like 5 other films that should have it's place i will never know
__________________
https://t.me/pump_upp



The Fighter (David O. Russell, 2010)


Dicky (Christian Bale) kicks his crack habit long enough to aid his brother, boxer Micky Ward (Mark Wahlberg), in his unlikely quest for the title.
__________________
''Haters are my favourite. I've built an empire with the bricks they've thrown at me... Keep On Hating''
- CM Punk
http://threemanbooth.files.wordpress...unkshrug02.gif



2022 Mofo Fantasy Football Champ
Big Eyes
+
Au Hasard Balthazar

Election
+
Jerry Maguire
-
Suspiria

Assault on Precinct 13

Red Eye
REWATCH
Foxcatcher

The Grapes of Wrath
+ REWATCH
Maleficent








Election is great, Reese Witherspoon does well when she's playing a b*tch.



Haven't posted here in a while, here's just some of the films I saw recently:




To the Wonder (2012)

The Phantom of Liberty (1974)

Mud (2012)
*
Fright Night (1985)

The Guest (2014)

The Drop (2014)

Daisies (1966)

The Player (1992)

Blue Valentine (2010)

5 Centimeters Per Second (2007)

The Theory of Everything (2014)

Foxcatcher (2014)

Whiplash (2014)

Vampyr (1932)

Days of Being Wild (1990)

Fury (2014)

American Sniper (2014)

John Wick (2014)

It's Such a Beautiful Day (2012)



why this film is getting nominated for Best Picture over like 5 other films that should have it's place i will never know
Probably cause it's directed by C.Eastwood. And maybe cause B.Cooper is in the lead. And of course, it's about war. Biopic about war!



why this film is getting nominated for Best Picture over like 5 other films that should have it's place i will never know
__________________
5-time MoFo Award winner.



A system of cells interlinked
Star Wars (Lucas, 1977)

No, not Star Wars : A New Hope.

Star Wars

The 1977 unaltered, Han shoots first, no ring-around-the-Death Star space adventure. As I watched, I realized I had not seen this version since the early 90s, and I had NEVER seen it in HD with a brilliant negative clean-up job.

Sadly, the version I watched, which was painstakingly cobbled together over the past few years by fans, is not available legally. It was handed to me on a stick, and although i normally frown on most piracy if a film is readily available to buy or stream, I had no problem with this. The really sad thing is that this is what fans of the original film must resort to if they want to watch a version of their childhood favorite that hasn't been toyed with incessantly.

The first thing I noticed was how natural the colors looked - I presume over-saturation was part of the approach when they put together the alleged "special editions", ie. crap versions, in the 90s. All the releases after and including the specials are terribly over-saturated, awash in magenta overtones, especially the Blu-Ray releases, which look just abysmal when compared to footage from the version I watched, which is known as The Despecialized version.

Anyway - what a pleasure. I've grown older, and a lot of the Star Wars magic from way back when has just sort of dissipated for me over the years, but it was a fun, nostalgic watch. I doubt I will return to these films many more times in the future, but when i do, I will most certainly pop in this, the original Star Wars.
__________________
“It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance.” ― Thomas Sowell



Finished here. It's been fun.

To the Wonder (2012)
I'm gonna have to check this one out now; Huge fan of Malick, just never got around to it. Why do you think this movie get such mixed to negative reviews?



Sorry if I'm rude but I'm right
Why do you think this movie get such mixed to negative reviews?
Doesn't every Malick film he made after Days of Heaven get mixed reviews?
__________________
Look, I'm not judging you - after all, I'm posting here myself, but maybe, just maybe, if you spent less time here and more time watching films, maybe, and I stress, maybe your taste would be of some value. Just a thought, ya know.



Finished here. It's been fun.
Doesn't every Malick film he made after Days of Heaven get mixed reviews?
Well to general audiences I suppose, but usually they are received very well critically. Days of Heaven and Badlands are regarded as classics. Thin Red Line gets alot of love, and Tree of Life has a nice cult of people who adore it.

Compared to his other films, To The Wonder seems like the most divisive.



Gangster Rap is Shakespeare for the Future
Malick is a Hollywood director, so despite his auteurist nature and his relative independence from studio constraints, his marketplace is still the Hollywood marketplace as opposed to an arthouse or festival marketplace. As such, his films are treated as commodities, to be summarized and then bought and sold. This thoroughly reduces or limits the appearance of a filmmaker as complex as Malick. It also means that Malick is expected to make "Malick films," another assembly line product that's just manufactured by a different "company." So when Malick is, instead of turning in a standard product, evolving his filmmaking philosophy, format, and style, it bewilders those who were expecting a "Malick product." It's the same thing that happened to Orson Welles in Hollywood and Jean-Luc Godard among film critics. Malick is simply moving ahead, and reviewers who are used to churning out assembly line reviews of assembly line products are going to be bewildered and annoyed at something that doesn't work the way they want it to. The difference between To The Wonder and Malick's other films is that The Tree of Life is fresh in people's minds.
__________________
Mubi



I'm gonna have to check this one out now; Huge fan of Malick, just never got around to it. Why do you think this movie get such mixed to negative reviews?
Maybe because its themes are presented in such a way that it comes off as pretentious to most viewers, personally I thought the overall tone of the film complemented these themes nicely. I guess it's also due to it not being as ambitious as Tree of Life, but for me Malick succeeded even if he took a much simpler subject this time.

I can understand the backlash for Tree of Life but I was honestly quite surprised with the negative reaction and hatred for this one. I think it's delightful and beautifully shot, there is stuff in it pretty much any film lover should enjoy

Minio and bluedeed are also right