I was watching The Fast and Furious 6, and I liked it, it was fun. But there is one moment that takes the cake for me, in the climax that really took me out of it, and just made me roll eyes.
SPOILER FROM MOVIE
Basically in the action climax, DSS agent Hobbs (Dwayne Johnson), finds out that his partner Riley (Gina Carano) has betrayed him and was actually working for the villains. She also got other DSS agents and innocent people killed as a result of her betrayal. So Hobbs wants to kill her to avenge what she did. During the fight sequence, Hobbs gains the upper hand, and gets a gun and points it her.
Riley is now unarmed with a gun on her, and Hobbs can shoot her to avenge what she did now. However, instead of just shooting her, he tosses the gun to Letty (Michelle Rodriguez), and Letty pulls the trigger for him, and shoots her dead.
Now I thought that this was really dumb. I mean Hobbs, wants to avenge what she did, but the filmmakers seem to have felt that you can't have a male character exacting revenge on a woman, so he must throw the gun to another female character and have her do it.
But Hobbs has had no problem killing in cold blood like he did in the previous Fast and the Furious movie, and now all of a sudden he has a problem avenging comrads' deaths, because it's a woman this time? I mean aren't the filmmakers just being too sensitive and too PC now, where it just makes a person roll their eyes and get taken out of the movie now?
Plus Hobbs, comes off as this merciless tough agent who has no problem killing to avenge with his extremely muscular physique, goatee, and shaved head.. Yet he just completely hands his testicles over to Michelle Rodriguez and wimps out in the end, all because of Hollywood PC writing.
Is it just me, or is this starting to bother anyone else? It does happen in the movies, but I felt this one really took the cake, since they want the female character to die either way, but actually cares which gender pulls the trigger.
And don't get me wrong. When I ask is feminism in movies getting out of hand, I've always thought of myself as a feminist I would say. But I think this is just ridiculous. But what do you think?
SPOILER FROM MOVIE
Basically in the action climax, DSS agent Hobbs (Dwayne Johnson), finds out that his partner Riley (Gina Carano) has betrayed him and was actually working for the villains. She also got other DSS agents and innocent people killed as a result of her betrayal. So Hobbs wants to kill her to avenge what she did. During the fight sequence, Hobbs gains the upper hand, and gets a gun and points it her.
Riley is now unarmed with a gun on her, and Hobbs can shoot her to avenge what she did now. However, instead of just shooting her, he tosses the gun to Letty (Michelle Rodriguez), and Letty pulls the trigger for him, and shoots her dead.
Now I thought that this was really dumb. I mean Hobbs, wants to avenge what she did, but the filmmakers seem to have felt that you can't have a male character exacting revenge on a woman, so he must throw the gun to another female character and have her do it.
But Hobbs has had no problem killing in cold blood like he did in the previous Fast and the Furious movie, and now all of a sudden he has a problem avenging comrads' deaths, because it's a woman this time? I mean aren't the filmmakers just being too sensitive and too PC now, where it just makes a person roll their eyes and get taken out of the movie now?
Plus Hobbs, comes off as this merciless tough agent who has no problem killing to avenge with his extremely muscular physique, goatee, and shaved head.. Yet he just completely hands his testicles over to Michelle Rodriguez and wimps out in the end, all because of Hollywood PC writing.
Is it just me, or is this starting to bother anyone else? It does happen in the movies, but I felt this one really took the cake, since they want the female character to die either way, but actually cares which gender pulls the trigger.
And don't get me wrong. When I ask is feminism in movies getting out of hand, I've always thought of myself as a feminist I would say. But I think this is just ridiculous. But what do you think?