Originally posted by Kong
Kong used to love this movie when he was a kid, but seeing it again, after so many years, didn't bring back that same joy. It isn't a bad movie by any means, but it definitely doesn't live up to all the fond memories Kong had for it.
I agree with Kong's statement above, however, this was a first-time viewing for me. If I had seen this as a kid, I might have fond memories, but as an adult, it didn't bring much entertainment.
Originally posted by Kong
A 16 year old Jeniffer Connelly gives a performance that is suitable for the material, but nothing worth writing home about. (She has certainly improved as an actress over the years.)
Originally posted by Beale the Rippe
Jennifer Connelly gives the star making performance, (or at least a performance that led to a star making performance). Thats pretty much all I have to say about her, except I believed her characters emotional transformation, and I thought her performance was good.
If I didn't know who Jeniffer Connelly was, I would have dismissed her as the "poor man's Brooke Shields of the 80's." However, having won an Academy Award, and performing in some very critically aclaimed films, I'd say she has more than surpassed Brooke as an accomplished actress.
Originally posted by Kong
David Bowie playing Jared the Goblin King does quite well in the role.
Originally posted by nebbit
I loved the movie I haven't seen it for years, always love David Bowie.
The sound track and Bowies singing great.
Originally posted by Beale the Rippe
David Bowie gives a unique performance as the villian. It is stylishly menacing in some parts, loving in others, and forces the watcher (or at least me) to feel sorry for him as his plans fail. (And the songs are pretty good)
I've always loved David Bowie, but Jared's clothes and hair seem a little dated now. It screams of the 80's! Villians who stand the test of time are usually not dated. His character also didn't seem to be a real threat, either. He didn't seem ominous, menacing, or evil. It was almost as if he was teaching the Sarah "the brat" a lesson.
Originally posted by Kong
The muppetry in the film is excellent, and has certainly stood the test of time. CGI has taken over the industry and it was nice to see how good puppets/muppets can look in comparison. Is Kong the only one who thought the old puppet Yoda from Star Wars episodes IV-VI looked better than the new CGI Yoda used in the recent Star Wars films?
I agree with Kong 100%. The muppetry was very good. Hoggle and Lewdoe (sp?), as well as the rest of the muppets were very convincing. Yoda was better in STAR WARS V and VI (he wasn't in IV, was he?). There is more of a realistic feel to the muppet characters.
Originally posted by nebbit
I love the part where they encountered the place of terrible smells I was laughing and grimacing at the same time, as my dog farted at that point and I got the smell full on.
Pretty funny, nebbit! I loved the "Bog of Eternal Stench." The noises of the bubbling bog remined me of the scene in BLAZZING SADDLES in which the cowboys are eating beans around the campfire.
Here are a few more things I liked about this film:
The dialogue exchange between Hoggle and the talking walls:
Wall#1: Sorry, just doing my job.
Wall #2: Come on, I haven't said it in so long.
Hoggle: Ok, but don't expect a big reaction.
Also, the encounters with the passage guards in which one always tells the truth and the other always lies, as well as the encounter with the door knockers. Those scenes were pretty funny.
The film entertained my 4 year-old, but it's not something that I'll be watching again someday. It wasn't boring, by all means, but it doesn't seem like the type of kids film that stands the test of time (THE WIZARD OF OZ, WILLIE WONKA AND THE CHOCOLATE FACTORY, CHITTY-CHITTY BANG-BANG, just to name a few).