I love Thrillers. I guess, keeping the audience interested about what is going to happen next is always a good thing for cinema. Anyways, making any genre based list is difficult and the biggest difficulty arises from the fact that whether the film in contention does actually fall in that genre or not. For example, there are many lists of thrillers in the web where I see films like "Persona", "Woman in the Dunes" or "Rashomon" have been included as thrillers. All three of them are my favorites and I won't deny that there were momentary elements of thrill and suspense in all of them, but I would not include them in my list, because I think they are not predominantly thrillers/suspense movies, the genre that best describes all three of them would be Drama. Now, here it is a purely subjective thing. It all goes down to how broad you want to make it. Well, while you don't want to be too closed and unnecessarily restricted, you also don't want to make it so broad that it doesn't hold any meaning any more. Balancing between the two was tough. I tried it my way.
While I was ranking the films I was wondering if they should be ranked in terms of how good films they are or as how good thrillers. For example, I think "No Country For Old Men" is an overall better film than, say, "Dial M For Murder"...but the later, according to me, is a better thriller. This was another trouble zone for me. I am sure I couldn't have been fully consistent.
While I was ranking the films I was wondering if they should be ranked in terms of how good films they are or as how good thrillers. For example, I think "No Country For Old Men" is an overall better film than, say, "Dial M For Murder"...but the later, according to me, is a better thriller. This was another trouble zone for me. I am sure I couldn't have been fully consistent.
__________________
To Suggest Is To Create, To Name Is To Destroy
To Suggest Is To Create, To Name Is To Destroy