Movies:

Tools    





Movies:


Today, I’ve decided to write a different kind of essay about movies.

I still remember when going to the movies at a real movie theatre was a real American pasttime, either with family, friends, or even solo. Many more movie palaces existed, with single-screen theatres, that were very baroque-looking and elegant, both insid and out, and that had balconies, to boot. Going to such a palace of a movie theatre was part of the movie-going experience itself, in addition to seeing movies on a great big, wide screen, they way they’re really meant to be seen. There was a time, too, when many, if not most movies were based on books, had a real story and plot behind them, and had much style as well as substance. Granted, there were many crummy movies back in the 1950’s and 1960’s, too, but there were also many more that had plenty of the above-mentioned quallities to them. In the 1970’s and in the 1980’s, despite the fact that the movie industry and the quallity of films had begun their decline, there were plenty of good movies to be seen, and there were still plenty of repertory movie theatres to be had in our area. Often enough, back in the 1960's, when my sister and I were teenagers, particularly on a Friday or Saturday night, or on a weekend afternoon, there’d be a long line extending outside and winding around the block to get in to see a certain movie that everybody wanted to see that was “hot” at the tiime. Waiting in line to get into a movie could be unpredictable because one never knew whether or not they’d be able to get into that particular screening. Not being able to get into a particular showing because it was too crowded, which happened on occasion, could be rather frustrating and disappointing. Yet, there could also be something very exciting about waiting in line, too. When we were kids, we didn't mind it so much. Not too long ago, when “No Country for Old Men” opened at the Coolidge Corner Theatre, in Brookline, MA, however, old memories of this echoed back at me while I waited in line one moderately cool Saturday night to get into the theatre for a late showing of No Country For Old Men. The line wound all the way to the back of the building, and the theatre management had to order the many people who were lined up behind me to move out of the back parking lot and line up against the wall of the building..

Although I grew up in a small town without a movie theatre, there were other adjacent towns that did have movie theatres, or we’d go to Boston or Cambridge to see a movie, as a family. This was before either my sister or I were of driving age, and, often enough, particularly on a weekend evening or afternoon, we’d get dropped off by our parents to see a certain movie, sometimes accompanied by friends, other times not. Occasionally, for better or worse, we’d see other kids that we knew at that same showing. All during the 1950’s and 1960’s, and even into the 1970’s, moviegoing would be a family/friends outing, complete with popcorn, soda, etc. Although there were still some good movies and movie theatres to be had during the 1970’s, the quality of movies began its decline, and, although there were still a number of movie palaces, revival movie houses, etc., they, too had begun to close down, or they were bought out by larger movie-theatre chains. Moviegoing began to take a somewhat different twist too, as many colleges, universities, libraries, and even bars began to show movies in 16mm, which were also quite popular with students.

In the early 1980’s, during the Reagan years, the United States Supreme Court voted to allow the making of movies into videotapes to be played on VCR’s, which, in turn, led up to the making of more sharply focused DVD’s and the advent of DVD players. Giant-sized TV’s and elaborate home-theatre systems also became popular overtime, and the movie experience today has taken a different turn. Nowadays, with people working longer hours, and not wanting to deal with expensive admission and concession prices, extremely rude, annoying, or cell-phone using patrons, parking problems, not wanting to stand in line waiting a long time to get into a movie, and the poor qualitiy of many, if not most of today’s movies, which are often overly graphic, gory and violent, or with too much exploding on the screen. Many, if no most of today's movies are long on style (if one can call it that) and woefully short on substance, if one gets the drift. The gathering of family and/or friends in somebody’s house for a viewing of a certain movie on the big TV and/ or an elaborate home-theatre system has frequently taken the place of the outing to the movie theatre. In short, the home-entertainment business has all but killed the movie business. 16mm films, which were really boot-leg films, are no longer shown; even video, DVD, and the piracy of downloading of movies on computers and/or IPods have frequently taken the place of the movie experience in a real movie theatre. Often enough, movies become available in DVD as little as six months after being released in the movie theatres. Sadly enough, many, if not most of the movie theatres today seem to have become a vehicle for promoting movies on DVD.

How did all of this come to happen? All of the above, coupled with the election of corrupt politicians by the American electorate at large, indifferent or hostile town and/or city officials, who, along with the public at large, allowed overzealous developers to buy out the graceful, baroque-looking old movie palaces up, and convert them into condos, parking lots, arcades, or whatever they felt they could make a profit on. Often enough, too, existing laws regarding movie theatres, etc., were ignored, and/or interpretated and manipulated for the developers' own ideas and/or likings. Many of the old movie palaces were also allowed to slip into a state of disrepair, and were therefore no longer frequented by moviegoers. There was a time when almost every city/town and neighborhood had at least one, two, or more movie theatres. Now, most of the movie palaces throughout the country have long since disappeared into cinema heaven, only to be replaced by very antiseptic-looking multiplex cinemas that are located directly off of state or interstate highways, and contain at least 10-20 cinemas that’re essentially like gigantic TV sets. Often enough, experienced unionized professional movie projectionists have been replaced by young, inexperienced kids/adults who also work the concession stands and who don't realize that movie projection is an art and profession that involves more than simply inserting the films into the reels and letting them go until the end of the movie. They're often (though not always) poorly trained and poorly paid, and end up handling ultra-sophisticated movie projection equipment that's meant to be handled by professionals. The decline of unions, which began in the late 1960's, when President Nixon took power, has contributed a great deal to this situation.


Yet, one has to admit that there are advantages and disadvantages of both seeing movies at home and going to the movie theatres.

Going to the movie theatres:

Advantages:

A) Seeing a movie on a great big wide screen, in a real movie theatre with the lights down low makes the movie experience a special thing; it’s more expansive, and one can see all of the movie at its glory and splendor. This is especially true of great movies.

B) It provides an opportunity to get out of the house and to share the experience of seeing a film on a great big wide screen with lots of other people, whether we know them or not.

C) Going to a movie palace (what ones are left) in itself, is a wonderful experience, as many of them are quite elegant and baroque-looking inside, perfect places for showing great classics.

Disadvantages:

A) Unless one holds an annual membership to one of the movie palaces that’re still left here in the United States, moviegoing can be quite expensive, either with just general admission alone, or with the concessions, which are also expensive.

B) Unlike with the multiplex cinemas, which are often situated in malls and therefore have ample parking, parking in the general vicinity of a movie palace can be tough. If a city or town has public transportation that stops reasonably near a movie palace, one’s better off taking public transportation or walking (providing one lives close enough to the movie palace in question), unless one gets there by or before six in the evening, when meters come a dime a dozen and become “legal” during the evening, if one gets the drift.

C) Rude, annoying or cellphone using patrons, or noisy kids.

Yet, I’ve also come to believe that in going to a movie theatre, especially one of the great old movie palaces, the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.

Home-theatre systems and/ or DVD’s:

Advantages:

A) One doesn’t have to worry about parking, or venturiing out in thie cold.

B) For famillies where one or both parents work long hours, it’s easier to just slip t he DVD movie into the DVD player and turn it on, while everybody gathers to watch.

C) One doesn’t have to pay expensive admission / concession prices, deal with annoying, obnoxious, and / or cellphone using patrons, and, in movies with no i ntermissions, the DVD watcher can create their own intermission by putting the DVD on “Paulse”, momentarily.

D)This other advantage, however, is for the movie studios: Many, if not all of the movie studios have found that more money can be made more quickly by making movies available in DVD for purchase or rental.

Disadvantages:

A) No matter how amazing and fantastic and how like a regular movie theatre many people claim that a home-theatre system with a giant-sized TV is, imho, there’s absolutely nothing that beats seeing films on a great big wide screen, in a real movie theatre with the lights down low. Movies, particularly great old classics, seem to take on a magical, almost 3-dimensioinal quality when seen on a huge movie theatre screen.

B) The home-entertainment business, as I mentioned before, has all but killed the movie business, because there’s no opportunity to get out of the house, and it has efffectively helped isolate people from each other.

C) The movie-going experience, imo, has been somewhat cheapened by the home-entertainment business, and has been rendered into something less than special by most moviegoers, who ofteh prefer to stay sequestered in their own settings.

D) The home entertainment business has also made it far tougher for theatres to obtain many of the great older classics that’re still popular among lots of people.


Afterthought:

Fortunately, despite the changes in the moviegoing experiences for many, if not most people, there are still a number of movie theatres and/or movie palaces open, some of which play older classics, independent, and foreign films for those who like them, and there’lll always be people (myself included), who still prefer going to the movie theatre and seeing films as they’re meant to be seen; in a real movie theatre or (preferablly) an urban movie palace with the lights down low.



A system of cells interlinked
Cool post. I agree on some points, while on others I am not so solid on. I will say that I still think the definitive movie experience is of course on the good old fashioned silver screen in a old style movie house with a FILM projector. I love digital, but nothing beats film for me.

As I may have mentioned before, I try to hit the Coolidge Corner, Brattle, or the place I frequent the most, Landmark Embassy in Waltham, whenever I get the chance. I love the marquee at the Coolidge, and the theaters are a great throwback.

When i saw Blade Runner in December, I was sitting there reminding myself it was 2007, because it sure the hell seemed like 1982 again in that room. Well, almost, as there was no terrible voice over in the film this time round!
__________________
“It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance.” ― Thomas Sowell



Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.
The main thing I have to contribute, at least for now, is that when you go to a cinemaplex, do you ever notice that the credits, especially the ones which larger letters and names, are often chopped off at the edges of the screen? It's true that nowadays most movies don't even have opening credits, which are usually much larger than the closing credits and often placed at the edges, but I certainly notice this when I watch a trailer at a multiplex cinema. Terminator Salvation's trailer says that it stars "Christian" instead of Christian Bale. Therefore, you know for a fact that the projector is just too close to the screen or that the screen is just too small for the theatre. In some ways, it's as annoying as pan-and-scan; the fact that you know that you're missing about 20% of the picture on the right (or left) side while still paying top dollar to see a first-run film.

The other thing which really drives me up the wall, even more so than out-of-focus films in the theatre is when you can tell they are trying to cut costs by using old, dim projector bulbs. If a perfectly-professional film looks out-of-focus and drab-looking, it probably is in focus, but it's being projected without enough light to make the picture sharp and clear. It's the same principal as taking photographs without enough light. No matter how in focus the shot is, if the film speed isn't high enough or there is not enough light available, your shot will look out of focus and/or drab. Of course, drabness in photography could be due to overexposure of light too, but I'm mainly thinking about interior still photography now. For motion picture projection though, you really need a new, bright lamp on your projector, and I've seen far too many movies in modern theatres where nobody even knows what that means or the only person who does is too cheap to stock them because it might be money out of their own pocket.

Otherwise, I agree that movies at the theatre (especially large theatres) are the way to go. I enjoy the communal experience, but even I have to admit that sometimes the communal experience can be shared at home, and most DVDs aren't out-of-focus, have chopped-off edges (unfortunately, some widescreen DVDs still do - just check the credits), and are certainly bright enough to see things clearly, at least when you're supposed to see what's going on.
__________________
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts. - John Wooden
My IMDb page



The main thing I have to contribute, at least for now, is that when you go to a cinemaplex, do you ever notice that the credits, especially the ones which larger letters and names, are often chopped off at the edges of the screen? It's true that nowadays most movies don't even have opening credits, which are usually much larger than the closing credits and often placed at the edges, but I certainly notice this when I watch a trailer at a multiplex cinema. Terminator Salvation's trailer says that it stars "Christian" instead of Christian Bale. Therefore, you know for a fact that the projector is just too close to the screen or that the screen is just too small for the theatre. In some ways, it's as annoying as pan-and-scan; the fact that you know that you're missing about 20% of the picture on the right (or left) side while still paying top dollar to see a first-run film.
I suspect this is more the problem of a lazy projectionist. Sounds like the trailer was in a different scope than the film being shown, so rather than adjust the lens or curtains between the trailers and the actual movie, they left it as is.

Not having been there this would be my guess, anyway. I notice this kind of thing a lot. It usually has nothing to do with the distance of the projector from the screen.
__________________
"Film is a disease. When it infects your bloodstream it takes over as the number one hormone. It bosses the enzymes, directs the pineal gland, plays Iago to your psyche. As with heroin, the antidote to Film is more Film." - Frank Capra



I too remember the large single screen theaters.
The nice curtains, cartoons the beginning, it was nice.

I also remember drive-ins too.
They were fun as well.

As far as modern theaters, I don't go very much.
  • What kills it for me more than anything is the trash that talk on their phones. In spite of the requests on the screen not to.
  • Too many commercials before the main feature.
  • It's easier to watch movies at home.
__________________
"If you can't be funny be interesting."
Harold Ross



Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.
Holden, nope, that was not the case, and you go to far more flicks than I do, so I'm surprised you haven't noticed this. I'm well aware that certain things need to be rescoped to fit certain screens, but this is an ongoing thing which I've noticed for about 30 years now. I'll admit that your conclusion is valid part of the time, but you are not going to tell me that you've never seen trailers' credits chopped on DVDs? It still happens all the time. Maybe you're smart and fastforward through all the trailers, but sometimes I'm in the bathroom or can't figure out where Sarah put the damn controls. Sorry. I understand maybe you don't need to know that fat 52-year-olds go to the bathroom and still sometimes sneak a peek. But it just proves my point, or whatever the hell it is I'm saying.



Originally Posted by mark f
I'll admit that your conclusion is valid part of the time, but you are not going to tell me that you've never seen trailers' credits chopped on DVDs? It still happens all the time.
Hmmmm, not that I remember, and I'm a bit of a trailer freak. Next time you see one, let us know and I'll check out the disc.




As for the Terminator Salvation trailer you referenced, I remember seeing both "Bale" and "Christian" when it played before The Dark Knight (and all the Batman nerds in attendance went nuts when his name popped up). HERE is the teaser trailer on-line, full names in tact. I just about guarantee that one was a projectionist issue.




Cool post. I agree on some points, while on others I am not so solid on. I will say that I still think the definitive movie experience is of course on the good old fashioned silver screen in a old style movie house with a FILM projector. I love digital, but nothing beats film for me.

As I may have mentioned before, I try to hit the Coolidge Corner, Brattle, or the place I frequent the most, Landmark Embassy in Waltham, whenever I get the chance. I love the marquee at the Coolidge, and the theaters are a great throwback.

When i saw Blade Runner in December, I was sitting there reminding myself it was 2007, because it sure the hell seemed like 1982 again in that room. Well, almost, as there was no terrible voice over in the film this time round!
Hi, Sedai.

Thanks for your compliments and the post. I generally like to go to the Coolidge Corner Theatre or the Brattle Theatre when good films are playing, and I've been to the Landmark Embassy Theatre in Waltham at least once or twice, although that's a theatre that I seldom frequent, because I consider it too far away, and secondly, I'm not crazy about that stuff that they often play there. I tend to gravitate more towards older classics, or whatever, but, well, different strokes for different folks, as the old adage goes. The old, original Embassy Theatre, which was right on Waltham's Moody Street, was a theatre that my sister and I used to go to, either with family or with friends, because the small town we grew up in didn't have a movie theatre of its own. The old, original Embassy Theatre was special, because it was very elegant and baroque-looking, both inside and out, like most all of the movie palaces at that time were. We saw many cool movies there, and the old, original Embassy Theatre finally closed down in the early 1970's.

In the mid to late 1970's, the Totten Pond Road Multiplex Cinema was built, off of Winter Street, which was a very antiseptic-looking multiplex cinema. It was in a rather secluded place, near the Lincoln-Waltham line, where a notorious Lovers' Lane, in which people would go parking and make love in their cars every night, particularly on a Friday or Saturday night, and, from what we heard, there were lots of fights, etc., and one girl even got assaulted there one night. When the newer Landsmark Embassy Theatre was built, it felt really wierd, because, in this case, trying to combine "old and New" just didn't come off that well, imo. Plus it's in a much more isolated place than the old, original Embassy Theatre, and not nearly as authentic-looking, either.

In another, even grislier incident, two high school-aged boys were taken to that area one Saturday night after being picked up by a pair of intoxicated male drivers while hitchhiking. It had started off innocously enough; two boys and two girls were out on a double-date, and they were picked up by these two young men, who, although clearly intoxicated, didn't seem at all unfriendly. The girls were let off first, but the boys were taken to that secluded area at the Lincoln-Waltham line, and, from there, things took a nastier turn. One of the boys received a concussion from being hit over the head by a blunt, heavy instrument, and one of the boys almost got run over by the men's car while they were trying to escape. Not good.

In the late 1970's-early 1980's, the cineplex near Winter Street, Totten Pond and Route 128 closed down, and the Landsmark Embassy Theatre took its place.



A system of cells interlinked
Yeah. Coolidge is my favorite (I just love the marquee), and like I said, it feels like a time warp when I sit in there, especially watching something that is decades old.



Yeah. Coolidge is my favorite (I just love the marquee), and like I said, it feels like a time warp when I sit in there, especially watching something that is decades old.
Isn't the marquee of the Coolidge Theatre cool?? yep, I also agree that watching an older classic film there is an especially wonderful experience, especially in the big main theatre downstairs, which, btw, they did a a wonderful job of renovating. The chairs are much more comfortable, too. Last night, I attended a nearly-sold-out screening of the film Jaws at the Coolidge, and they'll be having Raiders of the Lost Ark next Monday night, to wrap up their Big Screen Classic Film Series for this year.

So, the Coolidge is also my favorite (I have a membership), and I like the Brattle Theatre, too.