I can see where you're coming from. I almost didn't watch it because of the "kink" factor, but being a documentary I anticipated that it would NOT include any graphic stuff-- which it didn't.
Right from the git-go I was directed more toward the relationship between the voyeur, Gerald Foos, and the writer, Gay Talese. I haven't read much of Talese's journalism in NYT or Esquire, but I had read his Honor Thy Father (1971) --about the Bonanno crime family-- and it knocked me out. So I was aware of Talese's talent, and was interested in how he got onto the Foos' Manor House Motel voyeurism set-up.
To me the story really was about the two men, how they related, and what happened with their friendship, especially following Talese's article in The New Yorker, and subsequent book. Gerald Foos was a very unusual guy, but yet strangely moralistic. I was happy the way the thing resolved.
The documentary itself by Miles Kane and Josh Koury was exceptionally well done. IMO the pacing was good, along with the syntax, and they used some rather innovative cinematography. I enjoyed it, and appreciated your heads-up.
Right from the git-go I was directed more toward the relationship between the voyeur, Gerald Foos, and the writer, Gay Talese. I haven't read much of Talese's journalism in NYT or Esquire, but I had read his Honor Thy Father (1971) --about the Bonanno crime family-- and it knocked me out. So I was aware of Talese's talent, and was interested in how he got onto the Foos' Manor House Motel voyeurism set-up.
To me the story really was about the two men, how they related, and what happened with their friendship, especially following Talese's article in The New Yorker, and subsequent book. Gerald Foos was a very unusual guy, but yet strangely moralistic. I was happy the way the thing resolved.
The documentary itself by Miles Kane and Josh Koury was exceptionally well done. IMO the pacing was good, along with the syntax, and they used some rather innovative cinematography. I enjoyed it, and appreciated your heads-up.
Yeah, it kinda became more about them instead of the "studies".. They both seemed like narcissists. Guy Talese had many pictures of himself in his office, but didn't even check things available to public record. Even when he says "How do I know how much a baseball card is worth" - a simple check on eBay could give him a ballpark estimate, and with his experience, he could easily find someone to appraise it.
I got the book, skimmed a bit. The one good thing about e-books is how I love to CTRL-F to find certain words used in subversive writings (sexual, drugs, or even the word money), as well as "Conclusion" which you could see was Gerald's summation of each event.