This is in response to rufnek's earlier post about the ending of Red River. Yeah, the movie went way over schedule and over budget. The problem was that the studio "rented" the cattle, and then there was a humongous rainstorm, which caused everything to be delayed and the price of the cattle, at least according to Pauline Kael, back in the day, raised the film's budget from $1.75 million to $3.25 million. Now, that sounds like horrible management of time and resources, but I still find it hard to believe that the cost overruns had anything to do with whether the ending didn't go exactly as planned.
I'd heard that Red River was overtime and over-budget, but didn't know it had to do with the cattle. For $1.5 million back then, I'd think Hollywood could have bought a herd of its own.
Still, it seems to me that the ending must have been the result of problems with the script. Seems to me the way Wayne played his character all through the earlier part of the film, someone had to die or be badly wounded, maybe crippled at the end of the movie. Instead Cherry ends up down but still kicking, while Wayne and Clift come out without much more than bloody noses. What do you think? Should the ending have had more punch? I saw one online review that said that in the original serialized magazine story, Dunston (who for some reason I keep calling Tunstill, a character in the Lincoln County Wars) dies from the wound received from Cherry and Matt and Tess bury him in Texas beside the Red River near his ranch.
Read somewhere that Gary Cooper was offered Wayne's role but rejected it because the character was too unsympathetic. Even better, they say the role of Cherry was offered first to--Cary Grant! A trimmed down version of that role went to John Ireland. Now wouldn't you have loved to see Grant in a Western!!!
Last edited by rufnek; 10-16-07 at 06:59 PM.