The incredible William H Macy, Donald Sutherland and Neve Campbell in the same movie. Who could resist that? So I rented it. Turns out little David Dorfman steals the show!
He's the little boy who plays Macy's son in the film. The movie starts out with Macy, a hitman, going to see his shrink. Hmm... interesting. In the waiting room he meets Neve who is cuter than words. From there the story progresses. I won't give away the plot but it's like something I would write... only with different dialog. Tracy Ullman, no slouch herself plays Macy's wife. While her acting was fine I could tell she improved her lines because she messed them up. Lol, she says some stuff that totally doesn't fit her character or the movie. I would probably give this movie a solid C. I was hoping for more really. I mean, no one does quiet panic better than Macy, but we don't really get to see that. And the stuff with the shrink (John Ritter) doesn't really tell us much about his character, instead we learn of his childhood through flashbacks. Donald Sutherland gives the best performance out of the adult stars. He is totally believable as Macy's dad. This movie had a good plot and great actors but it could have done so much more.
The dvd commentary was very interesting. The director, Henry Bromell, says the movie only took 25 days to shoot! And he keeps saying how he wanted a vertical, claustrophobic look to the movie. He also hinted that the little boy can't act. All I can say is wtf?? It's not vertical or claustrophobic and the little boy stole the show! There are times when the boy looks into the camera but it works. Little kids do that. The look right at you. Like when you're in the supermarket and the lady in front of you is holding a child, then the child stares at you. Perfectly normal, and in the movie it makes you feel like you are right there in the scene with the boy at his birthday party. I didn't notice until I heard the commentary but the little boy looking at me through the tv made it like I was there. If I ever make a movie I'm going to let the kids look in the camera. Anyway, I don't think the director knew what he was talking about, but he managed to make a pretty decent movie anyway.
He's the little boy who plays Macy's son in the film. The movie starts out with Macy, a hitman, going to see his shrink. Hmm... interesting. In the waiting room he meets Neve who is cuter than words. From there the story progresses. I won't give away the plot but it's like something I would write... only with different dialog. Tracy Ullman, no slouch herself plays Macy's wife. While her acting was fine I could tell she improved her lines because she messed them up. Lol, she says some stuff that totally doesn't fit her character or the movie. I would probably give this movie a solid C. I was hoping for more really. I mean, no one does quiet panic better than Macy, but we don't really get to see that. And the stuff with the shrink (John Ritter) doesn't really tell us much about his character, instead we learn of his childhood through flashbacks. Donald Sutherland gives the best performance out of the adult stars. He is totally believable as Macy's dad. This movie had a good plot and great actors but it could have done so much more.
The dvd commentary was very interesting. The director, Henry Bromell, says the movie only took 25 days to shoot! And he keeps saying how he wanted a vertical, claustrophobic look to the movie. He also hinted that the little boy can't act. All I can say is wtf?? It's not vertical or claustrophobic and the little boy stole the show! There are times when the boy looks into the camera but it works. Little kids do that. The look right at you. Like when you're in the supermarket and the lady in front of you is holding a child, then the child stares at you. Perfectly normal, and in the movie it makes you feel like you are right there in the scene with the boy at his birthday party. I didn't notice until I heard the commentary but the little boy looking at me through the tv made it like I was there. If I ever make a movie I'm going to let the kids look in the camera. Anyway, I don't think the director knew what he was talking about, but he managed to make a pretty decent movie anyway.