The Thing is a great movie that for some reason didn't score on its initial release. I can remember being in the theater on opening day with only two other guys in attendance. Aside from
Halloween I don't think Carpenter has directed another film that was a huge hit, at least on its premiere. His movies thrived on home video and cable and seemed to have found their wide audience from those sources. Although I went to see a lot of his films when they were released, huge audiences didn't. I don't understand it other than maybe the theory that his films don't appeal to the usual movie audience. But when I say that, I sound like I'm a snob, putting down the movie-going public in general for not having my taste in movies. I'm really not. I just wonder why the initial distancing from Carpenter, only for scores to love him in the privacy of their homes? People like what they like, so maybe the majority of movie-going fans chose to see something else, knowing that they would get to watch Carpenter's new movie at a later date and be satisfied with that choice? I guess I'll end up driving myself crazy trying to figure out why crowds love
this movie in general release but ignore
that movie when it's released. There's no real answer, I think, but many theories.
Speaking of the
The Thing (2011), I liked it quite a bit as a prequel and it's mainly due to Mary Elizabeth Winstead's performance and presence in general. I do love her so!
It would have been a fine companion piece to the 1982 classic except for a screw-up with the saucer under the ice plot point. If I recall rightly, where the 1982 film showed the crew watching a bit of film where the original Norwegian scientists find the saucer and blow up the ice to reach it, the prequel has them building a tunnel to reach the ship under the ice. Otherwise they followed the 1982 version almost slavishly in plot points (example: the square-shape ice coffin that we see Kurt Russell stand next to---in the 2011 version, they show the same ice coffin with something inside it that eventually bursts out which was cool to see, IMHO). Other than that, I thought it was an good film. But nothing beats the 1982 film.
I love
Vertigo and think it has one of James Stewart's greatest performances. He really goes dark and seedy in this one, with his unwillingness to let go of Madeleine where what he does with Judy is concerned. I thought this film, with its twists and revelations near the end gave a rare straight-up (via the twists) answer to the central mystery, which Hitchcock rarely cared about, instead introducing his " MacGuffin" in a film, then basically ignoring the resolution of it and going forth with the action. But this film didn't so much have a MacGuffin as much as it was a mystery that got solved for a change in a Hitchcock film. I loved that about this movie and the ending where
WARNING: spoilers below
Madeleine/Judy gets her comeuppance and maybe Scottie is punished a bit for being so obsessed, but at least he gets the truth
Madeleine/Judy gets her comeuppance and maybe Scottie is punished a bit for being so obsessed, but at least he gets the truth
. It's a pretty brilliant film but I already placed my favorite Hitchcock on the list. Neither of these great films made my list and I don't know what I was thinking by leaving them off, except that I was in a bit of a rush to complete my list.
19. The Searchers #97
1. To Kill a Mockingbird #85
25. Die Hard #63
14. Rear Window #40
8. It's a Wonderful Life #38
2. Aliens #37
13. The Wizard of Oz #36
9. Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back #30