Anyway, I didn't put any of the LOTR films on my ballot, but they're plenty worthy. People are finding some increasingly elaborate ways to say what just amounts to "other people's ballots aren't the same as mine."
I think it makes sense to judge the LOTR films partially on degree of difficulty, and keeping in mind how many wannabe epics have tried and failed to generate the same sense of scope and enormity since then. True epics are hard to find, even though there are many facile imitators now (particularly given the decreased costs of CGI), but the fact that there are so many films trying to do that makes the LOTR films more impressive and not less, to me.
And, not that anyone has explicitly said this, but I don't find grandeur or scale to be a less important or less valuable expression of the form than something personal or somber, at all. This list should represent all that the form has to offer, and that means making room for things like this. I'm glad they're on there.
I think it makes sense to judge the LOTR films partially on degree of difficulty, and keeping in mind how many wannabe epics have tried and failed to generate the same sense of scope and enormity since then. True epics are hard to find, even though there are many facile imitators now (particularly given the decreased costs of CGI), but the fact that there are so many films trying to do that makes the LOTR films more impressive and not less, to me.
And, not that anyone has explicitly said this, but I don't find grandeur or scale to be a less important or less valuable expression of the form than something personal or somber, at all. This list should represent all that the form has to offer, and that means making room for things like this. I'm glad they're on there.