Rodent's Reviews

→ in
Tools    





I don't remember asking you a ******* thing!
Excellent. Keep up the good work, Rodent. So far, I agree with the majority of your reviews, except for a few. Particularly, your review of Super 8. I know you try to remain unbiased, but I thought you were a little harsh on it. I thought the film was a great homage to the Spielberg classics, and the child actors, though not perfect (who expects that from child actors, honestly?), they were pretty good in my opinion. Using your rating system, I'd give it an 85% from my end. That's a 4 out of 5 from me.



I had to mark Super 8 down, I felt cheated while I was watching it.

After the marketing, I really looked forward to seeing it, especially with Abrams and Spielberg working together I thought it couldn't go wrong...

... but when I saw it, I just felt like it was a poorly 'written' movie. I say 'written' because all they did was use ideas from other movies.
The little actors are probably the best thing about the movie.



I don't remember asking you a ******* thing!
Well yeah, they used ideas from other films, but I felt they got the job done really well. I had 50/50 hopes of either enjoying/hating the film, and I was really entertained by the entire thing. In my opinion, with the elements they used from similar films, it feels like a film that pays tribute to the rest, and doesn't try to make something new. I think that's why I like it so much. Not cuz it brought anything new to the table, but because it reminded me of the charm I felt when watching E.T. and the like.



I know what you're saying mate, Super 8 captures the feel that it set out to capture, and does it really very succesfully, Paul is a similar movie, it does the job it set out to do and does it well... I just wasn't expecting Super 8 to be the way it is, hence why I felt cheated.

A recent thread on the forum was Trailer Trolls, I think Super 8 fits that bill perfectly.
The marketing showed a sci-fi adventure movie with a few touches of mystery, a bit of humour and maybe some horror mixed in too... with a strange thing taking over a town with kids at pretty much the center of proceedings.

But when I actually saw the movie and realised they'd made it a simple homage to Spielberg classics's's from the 70s and 80s rather than an original adventure that the trailers made it out to be, it put a huge dampener on it for me.
It's pretty enjoyable for a post pub film if nothing else in on telly, but from a personal viewpoint, it's just not really worth it's weight in paper or the praise it gets.



Quick change, no western this time, but will get one done soon...

... instead, with the sequel coming soon this year...

Review #112: The Expendables



A bunch of Mercenaries are hired to take out a South American Dictator, their job is simply an 'in and out hard hitting mission', under the guidance of a local woman called Sandra, who knows the area.
Upon scoping out the mission, Team Leader Barney Ross (Stallone) decides it's too risky and aborts the mission... but Sandra is captured and Ross has his conscience played on by the fact that she was captured due to their involvement with her.
He decides to go back into the warzone, to take out the Dictator, and free the woman he barely knows...

... tagging along, whether he wants them to or not, are his Band Of Mercenary Brothers...

... The Expendables.


A serious throwback to the 80s and 90s musclebound hero genre, from Predator to Die Hard and from pretty much anything with Schwarzenegger to anything starring Stallone himself...
... The Expendables hits hard and fast and has a very simplistic story of morality behind it.

It also contains pretty original character sidelines too, most of them containing morality and conscience tweaking backstory.
The movie then combines action heroes of years gone by with a few modern ones too and gives them some almost comicbook adapted names (Toll Road, Hale Caesar, Yin Yang etc), then throws the whole lot into an explosive no-brainer for pretty much the entire second and third acts.

What makes the movie work, is that it never hides from what it is...

... it's a no-brainer, yes, but at least has that throw-back storyline to it... but it knows it's a no-brainer and it knows it's actually been written that way too.
Stallone has also incorporated some top class acting from a bunch of guys that aren't really known for their acting prowess.
They're all lots of fun and really know their place in the story, and know their places in their roles, and can all punch the bad guy (albeit with an overly used bass sound effect) absolutely brilliantly.
The main thing really though when taking the movie in, is ego.

The Expendables crew consists of Stallone, Jason Statham, Jet Li, Randy Couture and Terry Crews with backup from Mickey Rourke and Dolph Lundgren.

Baddies include Eric Roberts, David Zayas, 'Stone Cold' Steve Austin and Gary Daniels.

Backing up all those heavy hitters are Bruce Willis and Arnold Schwarzenegger in smaller cameo appearances but both on screen at the same time as Stallone. That's something to see, believe me.

The action is also turned up for fans of the 80s/90s actioner... it's very big, very loud, very OTT, full of cheesey one-liners and quite simply... it knows it is.
It's lots of fun and makes someone in their 30s, like me, reminisce for those days gone by.
The other thing with the action, is that the entire cast suffered injuries while filming, especially Stallone when he came up against Steve Austin. It's very hard hitting.

The sequel that's out this year, though with some bad press recently, hopefully will be as explosive as this one... especially with additional scenes between Arnie, Willis and Stallone and the heavy hitting additions of Van Damme (playing a baddie called Jean Villain, yes, another comicbook name), and Chuck Norris as an Expendable too.


All in all a mixed reception gave The Expendables a low(ish) score, but it never tries to be something that it isn't. It's loud, brash, fun, comicbook and has the nostalgic no-brainer feel about it.
What makes it work... is that it's completely shameless.
My rating 90%





I don't remember asking you a ******* thing!
Is it wrong to say that I'm one of the few guys who didn't like The Expendables? To me, it just didn't interest me as much as I thought it would. It felt like the Pro Bowl (American football all-star game), in that I felt it didn't matter in the grand scheme of things. I can enjoy a mindless action shoot-em-up film, but this just had too many action stars for my taste. Plus, I couldn't keep up with the action at all. Moved too fast for me.



Is it wrong to say that I'm one of the few guys who didn't like The Expendables? To me, it just didn't interest me as much as I thought it would. It felt like the Pro Bowl (American football all-star game), in that I felt it didn't matter in the grand scheme of things. I can enjoy a mindless action shoot-em-up film, but this just had too many action stars for my taste. Plus, I couldn't keep up with the action at all. Moved too fast for me.
I agree but I didnt like it for a different reason. It was supposed to be a bad ass film but the romantic twist kinda ruined that all for me.
__________________
Yeah, there's no body mutilation in it



Agreed, the romantic thing was a bit contrived, but the overall blast-em-up feel worked well.
Made me feel like I was back in the 80s again.



This lost me after about 20 minutes. I'll probably give it another some day, but for what reason I don't yet know.
__________________
5-time MoFo Award winner.



You guys must be too young to remember the 80s musclebound no-brainers.

I can see the disliking for it... but for what it is, it's pretty good.



Miss Vicky's Loyal and Willing Slave
Man I really need to watch The Expendables. I honestly have no real idea why I haven't yet. I really fancied it at the cinema but wasn't able to catch it. I was so sure I would like it that I then blind bought it right when it came out pretty much and intended to watch it right away. That didn't quite happen and then I just kind of forgot about it. Will definitely get it watched soon.



I don't remember asking you a ******* thing!
Rodent, whenever your done with your latest Western review(s), have you given a proper review of The Artist yet? If so, I'm probably too lazy to search for it amongst the many wonderful reviews you have. If not, try pinging up a review sooner or later, if it's not too much trouble.



Not done The Artist yet mate. Will stick it on my list...

Here's a run down of all my reviews so far...

1 Young Guns
2 A Nightmare On Elm Street Remake
3 2012
4 Cowboys And Aliens
5 Cloverfield
6 Leon
7 Dreamcatcher
8 Alien 3 Definitive Version Vs Theatrical Release
9 The 'Burbs
10 Starship Troopers

11 Predator
12 Robocop
13 John Carpenter's The Thing
14 Alien Vs Predator and Aliens Vs Predator Requiem
15 Terminator Franchise (1-4)
16 The Fourth Kind
17 Jurassic Park
18 Pirates Of The Caribbean Original Trilogy (1-3)
19 The Dark Crystal
20 Tremors

21 Paul
22 Full Metal Jacket
23 Demolition Man
24 Dumb And Dumber
25 Ridley Scott's Robin Hood
26 Christopher Reeve Superman Franchise (1-4) And Superman Returns
27 Batman Begins
28 The Dark Knight
29 Ghostbusters
30 Star Wars Franchise (1-6)

31 Critters
32 Matrix Franchise (1-3)
33 Arachnophobia
34 Super 8
35 The Shawshank Redemption
36 The Abyss
37 Troll Hunter
38 John Carpenter's The Fog
39 Dog Soldiers
40 The Shining

41 Indiana Jones Franchise (1-4)
42 Robert Rodriguez' Predators
43 Sam Raimi's Spider Man Franchise (1-3)
44 Rocky Franchise (1-5 And Rocky Balboa)
45 The Lost Boys
46 Evolution
47 Alien Franchise (1-4 Including A Rerun Of Review 8)
48 Jurassic Park Franchise (1-3 Including A Rerun Of Review 17)
49 Gremlins Franchise (1 & 2)
50 Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (Original Movie)

51 30 Days Of Night
52 From Dusk Till Dawn
53 I, Robot
54 Steven Spielberg's War Of The Worlds
55 Bladerunner
56 Armageddon
57 Signs
58 The Quick And The Dead
59 Ransom
60 The Big Lebowski

61 Ghostbusters Franchise (1 & 2 Including A Rerun Of Review 29)
62 Pitch Black
63 The Day After Tomorrow
64 Independence Day
65 Cat's Eye
66 Equilibrium
67 Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes
68 The Karate Kid (Original Movie)
69 Die Hard Franchise (1-4)
70 Poltergeist

71 The Passion Of The Christ
72 Paranormal Activity
73 Paranormal Activity 2
74 Pulp Fiction
75 Critters Franchise (1-4 Including A Rerun Of Review 31)
76 Unforgiven
77 Black Hawk Down
78 The Fly (1986)
79 Lake Placid
80 Back To The Future Franchise (1-3)

81 Lethal Weapon Franchise (1-4)
82 Star Trek Franchise (1-11)
83 Of Mice And Men
84 An American Werewolf In London
85 Predator 2 (Including Reruns of Reviews 11 & 42)
86 Jaws
87 American Pie Original Trilogy
88 Godzilla
89 The Negotiator
90 The Green Mile

91 The Mist
92 Silent Hill
93 Highlander
94 The Goonies
95 Batman
96 Batman Returns
97 I Am Legend
98 Titanic
99 Saving Private Ryan
100 Avatar (100th Review, 150th Movie)

101 The Simpsons Movie
102 District 9
103 Slither
104 Wanted
105 Casino
106 No Country For Old Men
107 Blown Away
108 The Cowboys
109 K-PAX
110 The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy

111 Edward Scissorhands
112 The Expendables



Review #113: Little Shop Of Horrors (1986)



Seymour Krelborn, a local florist in Mr Mushnik's failing flower business, comes into possession of a strange an unearthly looking little plant that resembles a Venus Fly Trap.
Trying his best to keep the little plant alive, as its oddness seems to draw customers into the shop, he realises a disturbing truth... the plant needs fresh blood to survive.

But as the plant (now dubbed Audrey II, named after Seymour's love interest) gets bigger and bigger, Seymour realises another disturbing truth... it needs more and more blood in each sitting, and then Audrey II finally shows its real intentions and begins to actually talk.


What an absolutely spell binding movie... I'm not a fan of musicals at all, but Little Shop is an immensly well made movie.

It's extremely comicbook in design, from the humour to the horror and to the set design as well.
There's lashings of visual styling and even more lashings of comic styling in the extremely well written musical and dance numbers.

The acting is also top notch.
Comedic and acting genius Rick Moranis as Seymour is brilliantly geeky and nerdy, eventually doing what he can to save the world and the woman he loves. Moranis also shows his worth as a singer.
Ellen Greene is almost unrecognisable as Audrey, Seymours love interest. She's absolutely fantastic, especially her voice.
Steve Martin makes a brilliant turn as Dentist Orin Scrivello, Audrey's sadistic boyfriend and side-villain to the movie.

Support from Vincent Gardenia and cameos from Bill Murray, James Belushi, Christopher Guest and John Candy keep things rolling along nicely.


What really makes its mark on me though, every single time I watch... is the puppetry of Audrey II.
Utilising animatronics and trickery with various camera speeds, the filmmakers have managed to create a genuine character out of something that's made of rubber and wires.
I have yet to see any movie with any kind of animatronics, or even any modern CGI movie that has such a reality about it.
Voiced by the enigmatic Levi Stubbs (R&B Lead Vocalist with Four Tops), Audrey II is by far the best overall 'creature in a feature' I have ever seen.

It's with Audrey II that most of the action comes into play too, and it's very well put together in choreography and puppetry... if a little lacking in actual quantity.


All in all, wonderfully written in story, screenplay and musical numbers... brilliantly choreographed in dance and action... the finest puppetry I have ever seen and is simply just a load of fun to watch.
Undoubtedly a classic.
My rating 100%





Here's the Western I've been working on...


Review #114: 3:10 To Yuma (2007)



Dan Evans, a failing rancher is driving his herd of cattle across the big-country with his two sons... in the process they witnesses a man called Ben Wade and his posse of outlaws robbing a stagecoach.
Dan and his sons are spotted by Wade and end up losing their horses to the posse as well.
While walking back toward the town of Bisbee with a near-dead survivor of the stagecoach robbery, they are met by Bisbee lawmen, where Evans explains that Wade and the posse have actually headed into the town that the lawmen have just come from.
After the succesful but relatively accidental arrest of Ben Wade, the law of the town and owner of the robbed stagecoach decide to get Wade onto the 3:10pm train to Yuma Prison, under the escort of several armed men
Dan Evans sees an opportunity and steps up to the challenge of helping to escort Wade to the train station for a fee of $200, as he needs the money to pay off a debt.

What stands in their way though is Wade's gang of outlaws, who will stop at nothing to free their leader.


For a modern Western, 3:10 is relatively enjoyable, but not without many faults.
A remake of the 1957 film of the same name, this outing feels pretty bare and the ensemble cast feel just like they're going through the motions, awaiting their paychecks at the end of filming.

The screenplay is tip top and the overall action side of things is quite exciting, but other than that the movie feels pretty hollow.

The filmmakers have tried to add little touches of emotional backstory to the proceedings and have tried to build on the little legends of the characters, and there's a little sub-plot of Wade and Evans becoming almost friends and gaining a mutual respect for each others' tenacity as the gunfights are taking place... but mainly it's all a bit of a miss affair.
A lot of it is pretty forgettable too.

There are also a lot of quiet sections in the film. Anyone after a guns-blazing Western may find themselves getting bored at times.


Russell Crowe as Ben Wade is relatively believable as the super-gunfighter and outlaw leader, his overall presence on screen is quite fresh compared to some of his more recent outings in Hollywood.
Christian Bale, for me, wasn't really that good as Dan Evans. He seems to just recite his lines as if he's bored with the whole thing. He never really feels part of proceedings. His screen presence is noticable, but nothing that will live with the viewer for any longer than the film's running time.
Ben Foster as Wade's next-in-charge called Charlie Prince is by far the best of the cast. He's extremely unnerving and very believable.

Support from Peter Fonda, Logan Lerman, Dallas Roberts Allan Tudyk, Kevin Durand and Luke Wilson give the movie a little weight, but still, it feels more of a "let's get these guys onboard for the sake of it" situation.
There is some chemistry on-screen between the leading actors, but it's not enough.


I will say though, the action scenes are really well put together. They're exciting and very well choreographed.


All in all, I'm finding it hard to see why the movie was raved about so much by critics and can't understand why it was given such high reviews ratings.
It's enjoyable in the action stakes, yes, but anyone who's after a plausable storyline or any kind of coherant plot, may be disappointed.
My rating 74%