Sorry I don't think it is awful/scary and in that climate the absolute correct thing to do..
It's inconsistent with our laws, our Constitution, and our founding principles, so I think any argument in defense of it needs to be a lot better than a vague allusion to the "climate," as if all these things can be arbitrarily suspended
Originally Posted by FromBeyond;1712908"
They just had the same race" as if that means nothing during that time..
It means that we judge people by their choices, not things they can't control, like whatever race they happen to be born into, and that being born into the "wrong" race is not a crime.
as if the Japanese didn't see themselves as the master race.
They weren't "the Japanese." They were
Americans. Obviously, very few of them could have been spies, so what you're essentially saying is that it's okay to imprison lots of innocent people just in case some of them are criminals.
It happened so we don't know what could have happened if it didn't.. like Japanese spies sabotaging the war effort..
See above. Under this logic, why don't we respond to every crime by detaining everybody who lives on the same street? You know, just to make sure we get the right person, nevermind the 99% that are innocent. This, by the way, would have me in jail right now, as someone was shot at the end of my street yesterday. Thank goodness the "climate" in my neighborhood isn't considered bad enough to suspend due process.
I just find it abysmal when people cry for this bit of history but omit to mention of UNIT 371 or Rape at Nanking for which there isn't even a word to express the acute evil and makes Japanese internment in the US look like a summer day camp.
It wasn't omitted: she was saying something of personal significance to her. Specifically, that her grandparents had to face this. That obviously means more than something half a world away that has no direct connection to her or her family, and nothing about decrying internment can or should be read as an inherent defense (or downplaying of) the Rape of Nanking or any other atrocities committed.
And, again, one of these nations had an Emperor, and the other was a free society founded on natural rights. I'm much more worried, long-term, about what kind of things are possible in free societies than in oppressive ones.