National Treasure: Book of Secrets

→ in
Tools    





Here's my review of National Treasure: Book of Secrets, which I saw yesterday. I quite enjoyed it at points, and felt it found a good rhythm around the middle, but couldn't have been much more disappointed by the direction it took after that. I gave it a pretty low rating, which may be a tad misleading, because it's not a terrible film. I just found some of the choices it made to be completely inexplicable.


National Treasure: Book of Secrets



The formula for the first National Treasure film was an effective one: incorporate America’s sprawling history and legacy, throw in a few clever puzzles, and wow the audience with sheer spectacle in the finale. The problem with relying on spectacle is that you have to top yourself each time afterward. And though it’s quite fun at points, National Treasure: Book of Secrets is the unfortunate victim of this principle.

The story takes place a short while after the events of the first film. Benjamin Gates (Nicholas Cage) and his father Patrick Gates (Jon Voight) have been presented with evidence that their ancestor, Thomas Gates, was a co-conspirator in the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. This wouldn’t sit well with any family, of course, let alone one as concerned with American history as the Gates’. Ben becomes determined to clear his family’s name, which can only be done by finding an ancient city made entirely of gold. His search will take him to Paris, Buckingham Palace, and Mounts Vernon and Rushmore.

The city of gold, of course, would be the aforementioned spectacle. The other elements in the formula are in place, as well; there are interesting bits of revisionist history and historical asides that are fun to ponder, and some of the puzzles are fairly inventive. The clues are a bit more plausible (relatively speaking) this time around and there’s plenty of irreverence to stop the audience from analyzing believability. The problem is that when the film reaches its inevitable subterranean denouement, we feel like we’ve been there before.

All the players from the first film are back; Diane Kruger as Abigail Chase, Justin Bartha as Riley Poole, and Harvey Keitel as Sadusky. Voight has a fairly expanded role this time around, and several newcomers find plenty of time on screen, as well. Helen Mirren joins the cast as Ben’s mother, Ed Harris plays the villain, and Bruce Greenwood plays the President for the second time in his career (Thirteen Days being the other).

Despite the star-studded cast expansion, Book of Secrets essentially treads water, and fails to generate any consistent sense of wonder. The lone exception comes in the form of the titular book, which has been passed down from one U.S. President to the next, and details the nation’s most clandestine secrets. Despite serving as the film’s subtitle, the book is a tease, and doesn’t really factor into the finale. A film like this only works if the audience buys into the momentousness of its discoveries. But the film cuts the legs out from under itself by tantalizing us with America’s greatest secrets, and then asking us to generate excitement for the discovery of yet another pile of treasure.

To whatever degree Book of Secrets is worth seeing is largely thanks to its straightforwardness. A chase scene in an escape from Buckingham Palace is refreshingly coherent, and the comedy is simple and widely accessible. No one can ever accuse the National Treasure films of taking themselves too seriously. When one of the major plot points involves kidnapping the President of the United States, how could they?

Ultimately, though, these occasional bright spots simply aren’t enough to offset the messy third act, which feels slapped together. Questions go unanswered, a tense standoff is resolved through sheer confusion, and there’s no real payoff. The film’s own title seems at odds with its events as to what the ultimate focus of the film is.

Of course, Ben Gates never was much more than a poor man’s Indiana Jones to begin with, and Book of Secrets is little more than a disappointing appetizer for the main course that Kingdom of the Crystal Skull figures to be. It goes through the motions and fails to up the ante; a cardinal sin for a movie which aims to awe.





I love the first film of national treasure.. Surely I will love this.. This is just I think the sequel of the first film...



Will your system be alright, when you dream of home tonight?
I love the first film of national treasure.. Surely I will love this.. This is just I think the sequel of the first film...
yes, it is the sequel...

anyway, I thought the first was good, didn't need a sequel
__________________
I used to be addicted to crystal meth, now I'm just addicted to Breaking Bad.
Originally Posted by Yoda
If I were buying a laser gun I'd definitely take the XF-3800 before I took the "Pew Pew Pew Fun Gun."



Movie Forums Critic
Great info there, I've enjoy it, very fascinating film, not only your enjoying the film at the same time your learning history....IMO cool



That is a comprehensive review indeed. I watched the movie some 2 weeks ago. It's a fun and entertaining movie for me. I like the humors throughout the movie. The idea of kidnaping US president is hillarious. If you just sit back and relax, this is an enjoyable movie. I give 7/10.
__________________
My personal movie reviews: RYS Movie Review
Save the environment: Sustainability for Future



i've seen the trailer and based on what i have seen, i think it's a nice film.



Definitely not that great to watched this movie.



I'm a bunch of a hell!
The movie was great!it has the most intense action scene.



I like the review...Anyway this movie is really good because it made you think and analyzed a lot...



Can't wait to watch this movie....I've liked the first one so probably I'll watch this too!!



Registered User
I thought the Book of Secrets was not lame at all, but more the same as 1. If you copy past the sequel into the first, you get the same recipie and the same movie.

In general the movie was ok and is best seen in the cinema's, where you can expierence the large screen and sounds.

I give it a 7,5 for entertainment en fun.

Everybody already looking forward for Cloverfield? I am !



Movie Forums Critic
I like this part, the table, solving the puzzle tables.. .




I've watched the first one and was good..I hope that this part would be great...



Registered User
I thought the Book of Secrets was not lame at all, but more the same as 1. If you copy past the sequel into the first, you get the same recipie and the same movie.

In general the movie was ok and is best seen in the cinema's, where you can expierence the large screen and sounds.

I give it a 7,5 for entertainment en fun.

Everybody already looking forward for Cloverfield? I am !
Well, Cloverfield is not this topic By the way, I think National Treasure 2 is as lame as hell.



Registered User
Well, Cloverfield is not this topic By the way, I think National Treasure 2 is as lame as hell.
Why do you think its lame? have you seen it in the cinema? I think this movie is just for fun and for entertainment. And that is what they are doing well in this movie!



rex
Registered User
good movie



Ar3d's Avatar
BANNED
I can't wait to watch that movie in my own country. for sure it will be block buster movie in our country because most of the people here are already known how good actor was Nicolas Cage is.



]I love the first film of national treasure.. Surely I will love this.. This is just I think the sequel of the first film... and i think other shou7ld watch it as well