Prisoners

→ in
Tools    





As a father I walked into this movie having seen the trailer and known what was coming (a little girl is abducted, her dad loses it, Close Ones learn who they really are under true stress) but I was still resisting because these kind of films scar me now that I have children of my own. Then again, this is a ‘Hollywood’ child abduction movie so I’m kind of guaranteed a happy ending aren’t I? One which will undoubtedly en route keep me on the edge of my seat and pull at my paternal pain threshold?

Well it did but the ending could have been ‘happier’…


Setting the scene with the murkiest of backwater towns on celluloid in quite awhile, DOP Roger Deakins does what he says on his label and photographs the gloom and doom of the situation and the geography so it hangs in the air throughout the running time- spooky good.

No time is wasted before Hugh Jackman’s and Terence Howard’s daughters are missing (apart from a neat little off the cuff sentence/exposition setting up a deserted location which Hugh will need later) and at this point you can almost audibly hear Mr Howard’s agent promise Terence that he’ll find him a more macho part in his next film and just take the cash on this one and play the ‘doe-eyed, sniveling dad’. The reason? Because here comes Wolverine for Christ’s Sakes! Alright Jackman’s Keller Dover hasn’t got claws and he’s not chewing on stogies every two minutes but he has got a mullet of a tough-lookin’ goatee and he is chewing on the scenery with wanton abandon! I’m a huge fan of Hugh’s- I have been since he burnt a hole in the cinema screen back in 2000 with ‘X-Men’ and I have followed his career with joy- he is an all-rounder, there’s nothing he can’t do I think and normally you would hate such a bloody winner like that but not with Hugh, as whether he knows it or not (or he’s packaged that way by his ‘people’) he just has that ‘I’m just lucky to be here mate’ antipodean charm. The nicest bloke in Hollywood TM.

But in this film is he trying to bring a deeper gravitas to a role which will live with us long after the last jagged shell of popcorn has been picked from our collective molars? Will he use his industry weight to make it a movie that resonates through the ages?

A little while into the proceedings Hugh gets hold of prime suspect Paul Dano (no one does young misunderstood loner/loser/leech better than Dano, I know from his career that he’s talented enough to do anything but clearly he’s only being offered the same part by the powers eternal) and takes him to a ‘deserted location’ where he tortures him to ascertain the whereabouts of his daughter.

Okay, ‘fair enough’ you say, I would do the same. He brings in Terence (take the money Tel, it’ll all be over soon) who panics a bit and plays the 1% of the audience who wouldn’t beat the ****/truth out of a man who whispered to Hugh “she only started crying when I left her” (or is that just me?) and Hugh gives Paul a few good jabs but starts to think he’s going to far (on screen that is) to hammer Paul’s fingers to mush, hmmm… ‘I’ll scold you with the boiler later though mate- don’t think you got off lightly’ (again, just off screen).

The side of ‘justice’ is portrayed by the biggest puppy dog eyes in the (show) business- Mr Jake Gyllenhaal. He’s a great actor and again, seriously, I enjoy all his stuff- he never just ‘turns’ up for a movie, he cares about it and brings ‘a bit that doesn’t fit’ every time- something quirky and interesting enough to make you wonder what’s under his characters skin. Well, he doesn’t disappoint because in his Detective Loki (move over Tom Hiddleston, this character name can be used more than once you know- so there!) there are demons who obviously drive him (and the plot). He’s got quirky tattoos here and there, a blinking eye disorder (which I joined him in during a speeding car scene later on- excellent). He’s also never not solved a case and he doesn’t need a partner, classic lone-wolf copper and nearly forgot, he gets to tell his burnt out 9 to 5 captain to ‘go **** himself’ whenever he feel like it. So in retrospect I think the blink is to make him more human to us and not let us realize too early that he’s Dirty Donnie Darko Harry.

Now Harry, sorry Jake and Logan, sorry- Hugh start locking heads and have a little cat and mouse while time ticks on and Hugh’s daughter has been missing more and more days. And even though I’ve been pretty sarcastic up ‘til now I’m really worrying because a) I am a father and b) this film is tantalizingly setting itself up to be one to remember outside of the norm glossy ending- think Russ Crowe whistling (ironic in ‘Prisoner’s case) for his horse destroying the ultimate sacrifice Chris Bale just made in the last reel of “3:10 to Yuma” as opposed to Gwynnie’s head in that box in “Se7en” which Stays. With. You. For. Ever.

In the meantime the rest of the very talented (mis)cast play against type as pretty useless wives (Mario Bello must have the same agent as Terrence, at least Viola Davis gets involved) and all to a man stay out of the way of Hugh which is a shame as it doesn’t ring true in a true life scenario but there’s only so many minutes to tell a story I suppose and that’s for Hugh and Jake to drive (also I must say at no point did I believe Jake was remotely Hugh’s physical equal, I was genuinely scared for Jake at a couple of points when Wolvie approached him- Hugh needed a Russ or a Pete Mullan to balance the tide) to its neat twist finale which kind of gave moral get out of jail card’s to some and with a few handy coincidences saved the proverbial for others. Let me also make clear at no point did I want or expect anything fatal to happen to the children just to make a film a bit different… but there were other characters who could have ended up differently to set the experience bar higher.

So it’s a finale that’s satisfying but could have been that cut (Gwynnie’s head) above if a certain characters fate had not been left so wide openly obvious happily ever after. Gone another way it would have been a gut punch that you reeled from the multiplex thinking long and hard about but unfortunately Hollywood came to the rescue.

Prisoners 3/5 … Note to Hollywood – Peter Mullan takes on Hugh next time.




Prisoners is a carefully constructed labyrinth, deceptively simple and very clever. The material was nothing new even when the film was released, but director Denis Villeneuve (pre-Dune) and screenwriter Aaron Guzikowski work a few unexpected twists and turns into their maze to keep us on our toes. The key element, however, is Hugh Jackman’s career-best performance as Keller Dover, a father whose patience for police work quickly runs thin when Detective Loki (the always effective Jake Gyllenhaal) fails to find Dover’s kidnapped little daughter.

It will surprise no one that Dover decides to take the law into his own hands, recruiting Franklin Birch (Terrence Howard), his best friend whose daughter has also gone missing, to kidnap the only suspect – whom the police has ruled out for the moment –, take him to an abandoned house, and beat a confession out of him. This is par for the course in the movies, but is it realistic? Can a father, however desperate he may be, really go from zero to psycho in no time flat?

The film makes this transition 50% more believable by making the character a committed survivalist, meaning that he was halfway there all along. And even if we still found it hard to believe, Jackman would just browbeat us into believing it with a skin-shedding, raw nerve-baring, sadistic, ballistic, animalistic performance wherein he doesn't just go berserk; he goes full on Beserker.

In some twisted way, all this makes sense; the antagonist or antagonists are just as crazy as Dover, if not more: making children disappear is their way of “making war with God”. With that in mind, who better than a monster to find a monster? Dover may not in fact be too far off either, or is he? In one of those twists I mentioned, the movie toys with the Law of Economy of Characters by casting Paul Dano as the mentally challenged man on whom Dover’s suspicions (and fists, among other objects) fall.

Gyllenhaal’s work is as strong Jackman’s, but more subtle and nuanced; he gives his Loki an eye tic which lets us know that, although he has solved all his cases, and belying his usual calm and collected demeanor, he has not gotten to where he is without some traumas of his own.