I went to the Carmel Film Festival to see "J.Edgar." I was only able to see an hour and a half of the 2:17 minute movie because there were power outages in Monterey and the film kept shutting down. I can give you guys an impression from what I did see. Leonardo Dicaprio will be up for a Best Actor Oscar for his portrayal of Hoover, and he has a good chance of winning. His was a very good performance. As for the movie itself, I personally found the structure of the film confusing. The film is told in a series of flashbacks and goes back and forth between different periods of Hoover's life. I found the structure to be jarring, and for someone that was not familiar with Hoover's life, and the events told in the film, I didn't feel the film's events were placed in the proper context for the movie to flow and for people to understand the events of the film well. From what I have seen, I don't think "J.Edgar" is going to be a "Best Picture" contender. I can see it getting acting nominations, but that's about it.
The music, which is composed by Eastwood, is the most unobtrusive score that Eastwood has done. In most scenes, save for a couple, the viewer barely even notices any music.
While at the festival, I did get to attend a lecture with Gary Roach and Joel Cox, Clint Eastwood's editors. I found that lecture to be the highlight of the festival experience. Joel Cox in particular is very informative and exceedingly personable. The event was scheduled to end at 3:30PM and he stayed until 4:30PM meeting people and answering people's questions. I asked a question, which he answered. My question was what the most difficult film to edit, and in all the years he has been editing, were there any particular films that he found disappointing or that turned out better than expected? He said that "Bird" was probably the most difficult to edit due to the flashback in a flashback sequencing (this is very similar to "J. Edgar.") He said he wouldn't call any of the films disappointing, and that his and Clint's philosophy was that every film was a crap shoot and you never know how things will turn out. People may like it or they may not. He said that he felt "Changeling" and "Flags of Our Father's" were overlooked by critics and audiences.
I asked him why Eastwood refuses to do DVD commentaries and he said that Clint doesn't want to do them and feels the films speak for themselves and he doesn't want to talk the films to death.
The music, which is composed by Eastwood, is the most unobtrusive score that Eastwood has done. In most scenes, save for a couple, the viewer barely even notices any music.
While at the festival, I did get to attend a lecture with Gary Roach and Joel Cox, Clint Eastwood's editors. I found that lecture to be the highlight of the festival experience. Joel Cox in particular is very informative and exceedingly personable. The event was scheduled to end at 3:30PM and he stayed until 4:30PM meeting people and answering people's questions. I asked a question, which he answered. My question was what the most difficult film to edit, and in all the years he has been editing, were there any particular films that he found disappointing or that turned out better than expected? He said that "Bird" was probably the most difficult to edit due to the flashback in a flashback sequencing (this is very similar to "J. Edgar.") He said he wouldn't call any of the films disappointing, and that his and Clint's philosophy was that every film was a crap shoot and you never know how things will turn out. People may like it or they may not. He said that he felt "Changeling" and "Flags of Our Father's" were overlooked by critics and audiences.
I asked him why Eastwood refuses to do DVD commentaries and he said that Clint doesn't want to do them and feels the films speak for themselves and he doesn't want to talk the films to death.