Rate The Last Movie You Saw

Tools    





I forgot the opening line.
This was my mom's favorite movie!
I'd never heard of it before, and it's such a huge movie. I loved Alan Arkin in it - he stood out from everyone else to a great degree. Had the markings of a future star.
__________________
Remember - everything has an ending except hope, and sausages - they have two.
We miss you Takoma

Latest Review : Le Circle Rouge (1970)





I liked this, but I liked X better. Let MaXXXine come
__________________
There has been an awekening.... have you felt it?



I actually watched this somewhat recently. I don't remember the exact why of it since most of my short film watching experiences stem from reading your reviews. Maybe someone else here watched it and wrote it up. I did like it though.
Thanks for the kind words! Yeah, it's a simple but charming short.
__________________
Check out my podcast: The Movie Loot!



I'd never heard of it before, and it's such a huge movie. I loved Alan Arkin in it - he stood out from everyone else to a great degree. Had the markings of a future star.
So true. And this movie was very early in his career. It always seemed he should have been a much bigger star than he was, and his resume is relatively light during his prime. At least he's had something of a resurgence in his later years.







SF = Zzzz



[Snooze Factor Ratings]:
Z = didn't nod off at all
Zz = nearly nodded off but managed to stay alert
Zzz = nodded off and missed some of the film but went back to watch what I missed
Zzzz = nodded off and missed some of the film but went back to watch what I missed but nodded off again at the same point and therefore needed to go back a number of times before I got through it...
Zzzzz = nodded off and missed some or the rest of the film but was not interested enough to go back over it



Fred2515's Avatar
BANNED
RENFIELD (2023)
I watched it to the end without rewinding. For the role of Dracula, Cage in this film is ill-suited, and Leslie Nielsen, unfortunately, is all. In general, it turned out to be rubbish.



I forgot the opening line.

By New Line Cinema - IMP Awards, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=72657374

Evil Dead Rise - (2023)

I'll definitely be seeing this again. I didn't like the very start, or the very end, but the body of the film was pretty much what I'd demand from an Evil Dead film, and it didn't hold back like I was afraid it might - especially considering it's the first of the franchise with kids at the center of what's going on. Lee Cronin couldn't top the way 2013's Evil Dead got things underway, and I was bracing for disappointment - but I was really pleasantly surprised by the off-putting make-up effects and sound. Moments such as the Shining elevator homage had me thinking I might be watching a classic - but overall, in the end, it was just very good. It could have been a touch freakier, but I can't complain - it did enough to satisfy me. It sure didn't hold back on the vomiting. I don't think the ending was that great - but I can't deny that I had a great time watching it, and felt that the film was capturing that Evil Dead atmosphere and spirit. Considering what I feared this film might be, that's a relief. Well done Lee. Happy to see this doing well.

7/10


By May be found at the following website: IMP Awards, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=24105930

Children of Men - (2006)

Dystopian science fiction can get pretty depressing, but Children of Men is so well put together, and looks so perfect, that Alfonso Cuarón turns this into a cinematic triumph. The film feels even more timely now, with a pandemic that has disrupted the entire globe and the United States teetering on the edge of civil strife, an uncertain election the world is bracing for not far away. Refugee hate-mongering takes center stage in this, in a world where time is limited due to the fact that no new life is being produced - 100% infertility, and we're staring into the abyss. Through war and hate, a delicate newborn baby must make it's way - and I hold my breath the entire time. Initially, this film was too dark and full of despair for me to manage - but in the ensuing years I've been eager to see it again with an eye to how well made it is. It still surprises, and as I said - still seems ever so relevant.

8/10


By Movie Poster Database, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7678285

Jane Eyre - (1943)

My third Jane Eyre, and my reaction to this one has me thinking I should space them out a little more - Orson Welles plays Edward Rochester in a curious manner. Gruffly masculine, which I guess is on the money, but still feels strange when it's coming from a peach-faced, smooth, Orson Welles - and it's the way his eyes seem to penetrate what they're looking at that captivates. This follows the usual story beats in a familiar pattern - the adaptations go back as far as 1910 (that version is lost however - a shame, I'd love to see how they squeeze everything onto one reel) and there followed one in 1921, and one in 1934, the latter of which goes only 62 minutes. I feel the need to read the novel starting to bother me...

6/10




By May be found at the following website: IMP Awards, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=24105930

Children of Men - (2006)

Dystopian science fiction can get pretty depressing, but Children of Men is so well put together, and looks so perfect, that Alfonso Cuarón turns this into a cinematic triumph. The film feels even more timely now, with a pandemic that has disrupted the entire globe and the United States teetering on the edge of civil strife, an uncertain election the world is bracing for not far away. Refugee hate-mongering takes center stage in this, in a world where time is limited due to the fact that no new life is being produced - 100% infertility, and we're staring into the abyss. Through war and hate, a delicate newborn baby must make it's way - and I hold my breath the entire time. Initially, this film was too dark and full of despair for me to manage - but in the ensuing years I've been eager to see it again with an eye to how well made it is. It still surprises, and as I said - still seems ever so relevant.

8/10
Bump it up an extra star you coward!
__________________
IMDb
Letterboxd



LOOP
(2020, Milsom)



"Sorry. Anyways, I think I'm just gonna hang out and wait... till you tell me what you want."

Ever felt like you're trying to communicate with someone who just doesn't understand you, and you get stuck in a loop? That's the situation two young kids find themselves in this beautiful short from Pixar. Loop follows Renee and Marcus as they share a canoe trip at camp.

The thing is that Renee is a non-verbal autistic girl, while Marcus talks quite a bit. I don't have a lot of experience with non-verbal autistic people, but I feel like this short film does a great job of portraying their struggles at communicating. One of the most notable things is how Renee uses a sound app on her phone to transmit her various feelings.

Grade:



Full review on my Movie Loot





I liked this, but I liked X better. Let MaXXXine come
Wow....how do you make slasher porn look like sex porn? Get a poster like this.



Recent watches:
A Beautiful Day In The Neighborhood 2019

Battle Of The Bulge 1965

Big Jake 1971
+
Bloodshot 2020
+
The Motorcycle Diaries 2004
+
Gesture 2019

Rocky Mountain 1980
+
Happy Death Day 2U 2019
+
Jail Caesar (aka String Caesar) 2012
+
Jericho 2000
+



OUT
(2020, Hunter)



"This hurts... This *really* hurts."

Out follows Greg (Kyle McDaniel), a young gay man that's struggling with the decision to come out to his parents. But things get crazy when they unexpectedly visit him to help him move, and he ends up with his mind swapped with his dog, Jim. Greg/Jim then spends the rest of the short trying to hide any evidence of him being gay from his parents.

I'm not gay, but I can only assume that coming out has never been easy. Stigmas and discrimination makes the process really hard on everybody involved, and more often than not, people get hurt in the process. However, sometimes the hurt doesn't necessarily come from the "revelation", but rather from the lack of communication and trust between the family.

Grade:



Full review on my Movie Loot



Haha what a coincidence, this is on my to-watch list right now, I'm going through the movies of Johnnie To, including:


Election (parts 1 and 2)

For my money, Johnie To is the most underrated gangster/crime movie director out there. Election is an epic two-part story in the style of Scorsese that follows a traditional election among Hong Kong gang bosses to decide on the head boss of the entire syndicate. It's a tale of ancient triad traditions crumbling in the face of modernity and the fundamental absurdity of trying to impose norms on criminal gang bosses who are willing to engage in increasingly savage tactics to seize power.

Strong recommend if you like Goodfellas or Casino.
Hope you enjoy it. Election (part 1) actually left me pretty cold, but I'd still like to give it another chance some day. You should also check out Vengeance and Breaking News.





Mark Wahlberg very good as he always is. Movie too long though. Dragged at the end
__________________
I’m here only on Mondays, Wednesdays & Fridays. That’s why I’m here now.




Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=16189573

Jane Eyre - (1996)

It's been 12 years since the last adaptation of Jane Eyre was released, which means we're pretty much due for another one when you consider the time gap between adaptations. There were two made during the 90s, only 1 year apart, but generally it's a decade by decade prospect. Some time last year I decided I'd take on a little side project, and compare all the adaptations - my first experience was with the 2011 Mia Wasikowska/Michael Fassbender version. Last night I gave the 1996 Charlotte Gainsbourg/William Hurt version a go - produced and distributed by Miramax, so unfortunately it includes Harvey Weinstein's name prominently in the opening credits. Gainsbourg's name never came up as one of the ladies he abused, so hopefully she avoided the big-bodied producer in his bathrobe asking for a "massage". This adaptation was fine - everything you'd expect, and I really liked Gainsbourg in this. Although William Hurt came in for come criticism for being wrong for the part, I thought he acquitted himself well also. He's no Timothy Dalton or Michael Fassbender though. But, as Jane Eyre herself says, "Remember, the shadows are just as important as the light." This version makes itself unique in character by casting him.

7/10
OMG I have to disagree with the critics. I thought William Hurt brought such depth to the Rochester. Charlotte Gainsbourg, with her offbeat looks gives us a more convincing Jane. Fassbender and Timothy Dalton are too dang sexy for Rochester. William Hurt is also a very handsome man but he has some miles on by the time he made this version of Jane Eyre and his character just exudes an air of sadness and desperation. Have you seen the version of Jane Eyre with Orson Welles and Joan Fontaine yet?



Interesting, sorta good, AIR. It's an odd movie, about Micheal Jordan and the development and release of the "Air Jordan", the shoe that saved the fortunes of Nike and is still made, sold on Amazon for like $500 as of tonight. I don't get it, but it is what it is. The movie catches Jordan as a rising star and the guys at Nike, recognizing his talent, manage to get a contract with Jordan to use his name, blindsiding everybody else who wants a piece of his image.

It was one of the first times that a sports figure got not just paid to license a name, but got a piece of every sale, so even now Jordan gets paid a piece of every shoe, a nice deal. Since that deal, all sports heroes need a shoe or a jersey or something sellable that people will buy.

The movie is fairly pedestrian, and, for reasons I don't quite understand, probably something about image licensing, "Jordan" (portrayed by an actor) appears in a bunch of scenes, but we never get a clear view. This is the way old movies portrayed Jesus. Often sports movies are lost on me. This one is no exception.

5/10

Dude, you cracked me up.






By Movie Poster Database, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7678285

Jane Eyre - (1943)

My third Jane Eyre, and my reaction to this one has me thinking I should space them out a little more - Orson Welles plays Edward Rochester in a curious manner. Gruffly masculine, which I guess is on the money, but still feels strange when it's coming from a peach-faced, smooth, Orson Welles - and it's the way his eyes seem to penetrate what they're looking at that captivates. This follows the usual story beats in a familiar pattern - the adaptations go back as far as 1910 (that version is lost however - a shame, I'd love to see how they squeeze everything onto one reel) and there followed one in 1921, and one in 1934, the latter of which goes only 62 minutes. I feel the need to read the novel starting to bother me...

6/10

Aww I'm sorry you didn't love this. It is so wonderfully gothic. Orson Welles had a gravitas beyond his years and played many parts he was to young for obstensibly. For me, every Jane Eyre needs to stand against this one. The script is stripped down a lot. I think it is about 90 minutes. There is a lot of story missing, but much of that story feels unnecessary. So much is conveyed through the art direction, the cinematography and the music.