Frost/Nixon

Tools    





CAST:
Rebecca Hall
Kevin Bacon
Sam Rockwell
Michael Sheen
Patty McCormack
Frank Langella
Oliver Platt
Max Elliott Slade
Holly Weber
Jenn Gotzon

PLOT:
A dramatic retelling of the post-Watergate television interviews between British talk-show host David Frost and former president Richard Nixon.

Trailer:
http://www.traileraddict.com/trailer...-nixon/trailer

Opening in theaters on December 5, 2008



Boy, you really did a great job talkin' that one up. And in a movie with two historical people in the frippin' title you couldn't bother to identify which of forty-six actors you listed are playing those roles?!? A true wealth of information.



Based on the actual 1977 television interviews as well as the events around them, this is adapted from his own Tony-nominated play by Peter Morgan, the screenwriter responsible for another drama based on actual events, The Queen (2006). Directed by Oscar-winner Ron Howard (Apollo 13, A Beautiful Mind) and starring Michael Sheen and Frank Langella reprising the titular roles from the stage productions. Sheen, who plays the famous British interviewer, co-starred as Prime Minister Tony Blair in The Queen. Frank Langella has enjoyed a long career on stage and screen and won both the Tony and Drama Desk Awards as Best Actor for his portrayal of former President Richard M. Nixon during the play's initial run on Broadway following the London premiere. The seven-time Oscar-nominated Hans Zimmer will provide the film's score with Salvatore Totino, now a Ron Howard regular (The Missing, Cinderella Man, The Da Vinci Code), handing the cinematography duties.

__________________
"Film is a disease. When it infects your bloodstream it takes over as the number one hormone. It bosses the enzymes, directs the pineal gland, plays Iago to your psyche. As with heroin, the antidote to Film is more Film." - Frank Capra



Nixon and Obama have a kind of----similar (Captain Kirk-like) way of getting a point across.
__________________
“The gladdest moment in human life, methinks, is a departure into unknown lands.” – Sir Richard Burton



Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.
You mean that Nixon needs "Yeoman Johnson" to take one for the Gipper. Wait a sec, that's Reagan.

__________________
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts. - John Wooden
My IMDb page



HAH - no, I mean that Obama needs to think out what he has to say before he says it, because he wants to say what is popular instead of what he believes in. Yep/Yip.

&feature=related



Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.
OK. I accept that, but why does that make him any different than the other candidates? Tit for tat. I know a used car salesman when I see one, and I just want to know why Cal Worthington doesn't run for President. That dude even has a dealership in Anchorage. I never knew. Spot for Vice Prez!!



Why do only rich people get to run for President? Or people who are immediately surrounded by rich people? There is no way that Lincoln could ever become a nominee in this current world. (He was a Republican too, so it's not all about politics; it's more about people and character.) Oops!



Will your system be alright, when you dream of home tonight?
Trailer
__________________
I used to be addicted to crystal meth, now I'm just addicted to Breaking Bad.
Originally Posted by Yoda
If I were buying a laser gun I'd definitely take the XF-3800 before I took the "Pew Pew Pew Fun Gun."



Well as far as that quote in your sig' goes, I think it certainly depends on the sexual partner and the size of the hammer in question. I mean a small ball peen upside the noggin vs a night in the sack with Bubba could be tough to decide upon.



Why do only rich people get to run for President? . . .There is no way that Lincoln could ever become a nominee in this current world.
It's only after a person acquires money, position, or some sort of reknown that he or she starts thinking, "Hell, I could be president!" It takes a hell of an ego to think you know how to govern a country and an even bigger one to think you'd be better at it than anyone else. A regular working man is too busy putting food on the table and a roof over his family's head, keeping the kids in shoes and school clothes and finding some way to get them through braces and summer camp and the senior prom and their first years of college. But then who would you rather vote for--someone who can run a multimillion dollar company or your next-door neighbor who is deeper in debt than you and keeps borrowing your mower because he can't fix his own?

As for Lincoln, people have always underestimated him because of that born in a log cabin with a dirt floor beginning. If you read your history, you'll find Lincoln was one of the most astute politicians ever. And he also benefitted from several political occurrances and mistakes at that particular time. His earlier debates with Douglas over the issues of union vs. slavery showed the public that he was as good or better speaker as one of the greatest political debaters of that time, and it put him on the right side of a growing issue for preventing the spread of slavery. Lincoln lost that election but he made a national name for himself (and won the political support of the biggest daily newspaper in Chicago, Ill.) at just the moment his Whig political party was breaking up because the issue of containing slavery was splitting the northern part of that party from the southern part. This gave birth for a short period to the Know-Nothing party, which began as a secret organization opposed to immigrants from Ireland, Italy and Eastern Europe who were mostly Catholic. Several ex-Whigs not comfortable with the Democratic party tried to make do as Know-Nothings, but that party couldn't attract voters in the Southwest, Maryland, or the large German cities in the Midwest. But about that time, the Republican party came into being. It didn't make much of a showing with its first presidential campaign with Fremont, an Army officer famous as a western explorer as its candidate. But in the 1860 election, it was stronger and better organized especially in the more numerous states above the Masion-Dixon Line. However, Republicans couldn't even get on the ballot in 11-13 southern states--they were doing well just to survive without being lynched. So the Democratic party had a big advantage going into that election. Earlier, however, Douglas foolishly reopened the Missouri comprimise for debate, which alienated many Democrats. When he was nominated at the regular Democratic convention in 1860, several southern states walked out and had their own convention in which they nominated Breakenridge, who was a strong supporter of southern issues of states' rights and pro-slavery. With the party split, another group of democrats tried to come up with a third compromise candidate. So by election day, the Democratic party is deeply divided into 3 camps that effectively cancel out each other's vote and Lincoln, running with strong support of his party but in only a smaller group of northern and western states, wins a plurality, outpolling each of the three Democrat candidates individually although the total Democratic vote surpassed the total Republican vote. His reelection was later in doubt, however, as many in the North tired of the war and the northern Democratic party came up with a "peace candidate," McClellan, a popular US general from whom Lincoln had taken command of the US army when he proved unwilling to fight aggressively. But there was a huge shift in Lincoln's popularity when Sherman took Atlanta just days before election day --plus the fact that the Republican party made damn sure that Republican ballots were readily available to Union soldiers who could vote while in the field. Back then, each political party was in charge of getting its ballots into the hands of voters. Like I said, Lincoln was a very astute politician.



Can't wait for this to come out. I have to see this