Citizen Rules...Cinemaesque Chat-n-Review

→ in
Tools    






Back to the Future (1985)
Director: Robert Zemeckis
Writers: Robert Zemeckis, Bob Gale
Cast: Michael J. Fox, Christopher Lloyd, Lea Thompson, Crispin Glover
Genre: Adventure, Comedy, Sci-Fi


"Marty McFly, a 17-year-old high school student, is accidentally sent thirty years into the past in a time-traveling DeLorean invented by his close friend, the eccentric scientist Doc Brown."

Loved this one and I'd seen it before but not for the longest time. It was sure a blast from the past...or is that a blast from the future?

Back to the Future just flows perfectly and I was always interested in what was happening. The film pacing and scene construction is flawless. So flawless that it actually gets studied.


The cast is great too! Originally Eric Stoltz was cast as Marty McFly. While Stoltz is a good actor he's no Marty McFly. After Stoltz left the film, the producers first choice Michael J. Fox became available. Fox is so natural in this. His comic timing and easy going demeanor with just the right bit of stumble-bumness is a perfect combination for the role.



The ungainly and awkward Crispin Glover as his nervous, flunky of a dad is equally perfect casting. I could go own with this...Lea Thompson as his mom, both young and old versions,...as well as the wonderfully colorful actor, who played Biff with such energy (Thomas F. Wilson)...both of them make the film special. And then there's the lovable, absent minded professor, Doc Brown (Christoper Lyold)...Doc Brown and Marty go together like potatoes and gravy!

The premise is so cool, with a teenager inadvertently using a DeLorean time machine to go back in time to 1955 where he meets both his mom and dad as teenagers...His own presences causes them to never date...and that's something he needs to fix pronto, so that he's not wiped out of existences.

The other thing I like is that this movie just oozes 1985! From the DeLorean to Van Halen to the jokes about then actor Ronald Regan becoming president. This is such a well though out script and such a fun movie!

++
Enjoyed your review of this classic...one of the few films I would rate




Broadcast News (1987)

Director: James L. Brooks
Writer: James L. Brooks
Cast: William Hurt, Albert Brooks, Holly Hunter
Genre: Comedy, Drama, Romance


"Take two rival television reporters: one handsome, one talented, both male. Add one Producer, female. Mix well, and watch the sparks fly"

I kinda liked it and was interested at first, but wholly crap was Holly Hunter annoying! Ugh, talk about a wrong casting choice, she ruined what could've been a good movie.

Broadcast News starts off as a would-be savvy news room comedy drama, from the same writer that gave us the Mary Tyler Moore show. Only one problem...Holly Hunter! I read that this movie was specifically written with Debra Winger in mind to play the head of the news production team. Debra would've been good in this. I don't know what Holly was trying to do with her performance? I guess she was suppose to be super high energy and driven to perfection. But she came off like some sort of nutcase who just drank way too much caffeine. I swear all I could do is watch to see how fidgety she was...and was she fidgety or what!

Then in the middle of the film it ends up loosing it's perspective as it tries to become a rom com. The romance part didn't work at all and didn't met the expectations of a more serious drama comedy about the troubles behind the evening news show.

Just saw this for the first time a few months ago and agree with most of what you've said here. I never knew that Debra Winger was originally supposed to play the lead in this.




The Jerk (1979)

Director: Carl Reiner
Writers: Steve Martin & Carl Gottlieb (screenplay)
Cast: Steve Martin, Bernadette Peters, Catlin Adams
Genre: Comedy


"A simple minded, sheltered country boy suddenly decides to leave his family home to experience life in the big city, where his naivety is both his best friend, and worst enemy."

The Jerk
is not the best written film in the world and it's not the best acted and it's certainly not the best film ever made...But so far it takes the cake for making me laugh out loud the most times. Yes it's stupid...like a Will Ferrell movie, but I like Will Ferrell!

For me The Jerk worked because it was just Steve Martin doing the dumbest things one could think of...and for some reason that made me laugh. Especially the whole gas station scene was funny. I loved how he was soooo stupid that when Jackie Mason tells him he can stay in a backroom, he thinks it's the men's room. OMG, and there's a dude in there taking a leak and here's Steve Martin all excited about how he's going to decorate the men's room with shelves and furniture. Then he looks at the bathroom stall and exclaims, 'this must be the kitchen' t..then he opens the bathroom stall door and in a happy go lucky way says, 'no' ha!



Is Bernadette Peters a peach or what? I love the applique jewelry, I mean that's actually pretty cool and stylish if you think about it. To bad she didn't wear that ensemble to a nicer restaurant, one that didn't have snails on the plate!

I seen this first run at the movie theater and have seen it many times, it's good stupid fun!






The Blues Brothers (1980)
Director: John Landis
Writers: Dan Aykroyd, John Landis
Cast: John Belushi, Dan Aykroyd
Genre: Adventure, Comedy

"Jake Blues, just released from prison, puts together his old band to save the Catholic home where he and his brother Elwood were raised."

I love that photo!...and what a great movie! There's so much to like in The Blues Brothers that I don't know where to start? Maybe I need a cold brew and some dark shades to get into the mood I'll be back...

OK so I got a cold beer, but my shades are reading glasses so that I can see what the hell it is I'm typing. So much for me being the third Blues Brother

...I'm old enough that I remember watching John Belushi and Dan Aykroyd on Saturday Night Live doing their Blues Brothers for the very first time. I remember they sang with the SNL house band. But I don't remember them doing any skits as the Blues Brothers. So obviously for me this movie earns high nostalgia points. But more than that I've always thought the Blues Brothers were just flat out cool, so how could I not like the movie?

Then there's the: OMG moment, when you realize just how much R&B talent there is in the movie. We get to see and hear James Brown performing, then Aretha Franklin and my two favorites John Lee Hooker performing on the streets and Cab Calloway doing his big hit Minnie the Moocher. For all that talent alone, this film deserves to be inducted into the Hall of Fame.

But wait!...there's more...The more is all those guest stars, one right after another. Way too many to list, but half the fun is just spotting the talent like Paul Rubens aka Pee Wee Herman as a waiter. And it was so cool seeing Carrie Fisher. I really like her and yet I'm not a Star Wars fan. I wish she would've had a bigger career, but at least we get to see her wielding some bad ass weapons of mass destruction!

Hey did you know The Blues Brothers movie was a musical? Surprise! and you thought you didn't like musicals

What about all those action car chase wreck scenes, talk about huge! talk about dangerous! talk about impressive! Geez, they actually drove a stunt car at over 100mphs on the street and then drove through an abandoned mall and smashed up the stores. There's some way impressive stunt work being done in this movie.





Dirty Rotten Scoundrels (1988)

Director
: Frank Oz
Writers: Dale Launer, Stanley Shapiro
Cast: Steve Martin, Michael Caine, Glenne Headly
Genre: Comedy


"Two con men try to settle their rivalry by betting on who can swindle a young American heiress out of fifty thousand dollars first."


I liked it! It was a fun watch, I wouldn't say it was the greatest comedy ever, that would have to be something written by Billy Wider But Dirty Rotten Scoundrels was a very satisfying movie to spend time with. I especially appreciate that it ended strong. So many movies fizzle out in the last act, but this one had a very clever little scene at the end.

I liked the cast: Michael Caine, that's Sir Michael Caine! He always delivers the goods. He was right at home as a well mannered, impeccable groomed and wealthy con artist. I'd never seen Glenne Headly before, but what a gem she was! She was so good in her comic role that I don't know why she didn't have a bigger career? And I loved the character she did at the very end of the movie too, and she did it so well. Then there's Steve Martin...I like Steve Martin, I do. I remember watching him way back in the 1970s on Saturday Night Live...he totally cracked me up every time he hosted that show. I've liked his movies, but here he was a little too Steve Martin and IMO needed to tone it down a notch. But not a deal breaker, just something I noticed.

You know they never make a comedy like this these days. Talk about high production values. I mean it was all shot on location...and such stunning sets! OMG I'll give this high marks just for the sets alone.





When Harry Met Sally (1989)

Director: Rob Reiner
Writer: Nora Ephron
Cast: Billy Crystal, Meg Ryan, Carrie Fisher, Bruno Kirby
Genre: Drama Comedy Romance


Nora Ephron's screenplay is really a thing of beauty. In a way it reminded me of a Woody Allen film, only without the cynical outlook on life. I liked the way her screenplay examined relationships, while feeling very grounded and real at the same time. Of course Nora Ephron is one of the legends in movie screenplay writing and she doesn't disappoint here.

I thought Billy Crystal was a jerk at the start, and of course so did Meg Ryan's character. I've never liked Billy Crystal much in his films, he often seems too jerky to be likeable. Meg Ryan was a bit of a snood too here, and heaven forbid if you should ever have the misfortune of taking her to a restaurant. But as they both grew older they mellowed and became more complex characters and that's thanks to the phenomenal screenplay and probably to the director Rob Reiner too. It's hard to tell in any movie if the credit goes the director or writer?

When Harry Met Sally
is one of the best written relationship films I've seen, except for two scenes that I think were over cooked. They are...The famous orgasm scene...and Billy Crystal doing his elderly Jewish man bit (which he did on the TV show Soap as well). Both were over the top and felt like comedy bits and didn't fit with the realism of the rest of the movie. I read that both scenes were improvised and not originally in Nora Ephron's script. To bad the director didn't modify those scenes to make them match the rest of the film's feel & flow.

Awesome drama, but I didn't even think of it as a comedy so don't know how to rate this as far as laughs go.

+




A Fish Called Wanda (1988)

Directors: Charles Crichton, John Cleese (uncredited)
Writers: John Cleese & Charles Crichton (story)
Cast: John Cleese, Jamie Lee Curtis, Kevin Kline, Michael Palin
Genre: Comedy, Crime


"In London, four very different people team up to commit armed robbery, then try to double cross each other for the loot."

I betcha think I'm going to gush over Jamie Lee because I used that image...Actually what caught my eye, was the fish! I've had tropical fish since I was a kid and I had great fun stopping the movie during the opening title credits and identifying the fish they showed! I knew them all too

Time flew by while watching A Fish Called Wanda and that's always a good thing. I'm actually not a big fan of Jamie Lee Curtis, she's fine here...then again all the cast does a great job, especially Kevin Kline. Kline is a natural born comedian and dominates the scenes that he's in. The last film I seen Kline in was the Errol Flynn bio pic The Last of Robin Hood. I liked it even if the critics didn't.

The biggest laughs for me came from Kevin Kline taunting Ken (Michael Palin) about his stuttering. Technically that shouldn't be funny in these days of Woke/PC culture, but I laughed anyway! Especially the taunting while stuck in cement bit, as Ken drives a steam roller towards him, ha! What I didn't laugh at, was the killing of the three dogs. Sure no real dogs were hurt, but I just didn't think any of that was funny. Let's see I need to end this on a light note so...


Didn't that scene inspire a humorous Swedish IKEA commercial?
+




Parenthood (1989)

Director: Ron Howard
Writers: Lowell Ganz & Babaloo Mandel (story]
Cast: Steve Martin, Mary Steenburgen, Dianne Wiest
Genre: Comedy, Drama

"The Buckmans are a midwestern family all dealing with their lives: estranged relatives, raising children, pressures of the job, and learning to be a good parent and spouse."

I've been thinking all day about what I would write in my review and couldn't come up with much. Well except for I liked Mary Steenburgen in this! I usually like her, so that's a big plus. Steve Martin was good too and more sedate than in most of his early movies. Strangely however he was at his best when he was being zany, doing the cowboy balloon guy at the party. I remember he had a comedy bit he did on Saturday Night Live where he use to make animals out of balloons too. So the balloon part was cool to see in a nostalgic way.

Then there's the OMG moment! When you see the dream sequence of the little disturbed kid who's now grown up and has become a mass school shooter. What the hell! Oh my! They would never do that seen today. Of course back then mass school shootings weren't really prevalent. Nor would they show a little kid fully nude as the movie does for a joke. Times have really changed since the 1980s, and I guess that's the best thing about Parenthood is it's a time capsule back to the late 80s when all those self important baby boomers were having babies of their own and they needed to let the entire world know it...'Baby on Board' OMG. I swear having babies was as popular back in the 80s as tattoos and texting is today.





Parenthood (1989)

Director: Ron Howard
Writers: Lowell Ganz & Babaloo Mandel (story]
Cast: Steve Martin, Mary Steenburgen, Dianne Wiest
Genre: Comedy, Drama

"The Buckmans are a midwestern family all dealing with their lives: estranged relatives, raising children, pressures of the job, and learning to be a good parent and spouse."

I've been thinking all day about what I would write in my review and couldn't come up with much. Well except for I liked Mary Steenburgen in this! I usually like her, so that's a big plus. Steve Martin was good too and more sedate than in most of his early movies. Strangely however he was at his best when he was being zany, doing the cowboy balloon guy at the party. I remember he had a comedy bit he did on Saturday Night Live where he use to make animals out of balloons too. So the balloon part was cool to see in a nostalgic way.

Then there's the OMG moment! When you see the dream sequence of the little disturbed kid who's now grown up and has become a mass school shooter. What the hell! Oh my! They would never do that seen today. Of course back then mass school shootings weren't really prevalent. Nor would they show a little kid fully nude as the movie does for a joke. Times have really changed since the 1980s, and I guess that's the best thing about Parenthood is it's a time capsule back to the late 80s when all those self important baby boomers were having babies of their own and they needed to let the entire world know it...'Baby on Board' OMG. I swear having babies was as popular back in the 80s as tattoos and texting is today.

I love this movie.

I thought Jason Robards had an understated role - his character is pretty profound and slightly disturbing as he admits to his one somewhat stable son that he "hated" him when he got sick as a baby for forcing him (the father) to have to care and then how the worrying "never ends." That scene with the two of them at the baseball field where they both confess to each other what a mess their lives have become gets me every time.

I also thought the kid who played Steve Martin's son did a great job - he was very convincing as the emotionally distressed child (reminded me of my brother). He also reminded me of a young Billy Mumy!

Still can't believe Joaquin Phoenix was "Garry"!



I love this movie.

I thought Jason Robards had an understated role - his character is pretty profound and slightly disturbing as he admits to his one somewhat stable son that he "hated" him when he got sick as a baby for forcing him (the father) to have to care and then how the worrying "never ends." That scene with the two of them at the baseball field where they both confess to each other what a mess their lives have become gets me every time.

I also thought the kid who played Steve Martin's son did a great job - he was very convincing as the emotionally distressed child (reminded me of my brother). He also reminded me of a young Billy Mumy!

Still can't believe Joaquin Phoenix was "Garry"!
Captain, why do you love it? You don't have any kids do you?

I should probably see it again, I'm guessing it's the type of movie that gets better with repeat viewings. It would be worth it for Mary Steenburgen. Are you a fan of hers?




When Harry Met Sally (1989)

Director: Rob Reiner
Writer: Nora Ephron
Cast: Billy Crystal, Meg Ryan, Carrie Fisher, Bruno Kirby
Genre: Drama Comedy Romance


Nora Ephron's screenplay is really a thing of beauty. In a way it reminded me of a Woody Allen film, only without the cynical outlook on life. I liked the way her screenplay examined relationships, while feeling very grounded and real at the same time. Of course Nora Ephron is one of the legends in movie screenplay writing and she doesn't disappoint here.

I thought Billy Crystal was a jerk at the start, and of course so did Meg Ryan's character. I've never liked Billy Crystal much in his films, he often seems too jerky to be likeable. Meg Ryan was a bit of a snood too here, and heaven forbid if you should ever have the misfortune of taking her to a restaurant. But as they both grew older they mellowed and became more complex characters and that's thanks to the phenomenal screenplay and probably to the director Rob Reiner too. It's hard to tell in any movie if the credit goes the director or writer?

When Harry Met Sally
is one of the best written relationship films I've seen, except for two scenes that I think were over cooked. They are...The famous orgasm scene...and Billy Crystal doing his elderly Jewish man bit (which he did on the TV show Soap as well). Both were over the top and felt like comedy bits and didn't fit with the realism of the rest of the movie. I read that both scenes were improvised and not originally in Nora Ephron's script. To bad the director didn't modify those scenes to make them match the rest of the film's feel & flow.

Awesome drama, but I didn't even think of it as a comedy so don't know how to rate this as far as laughs go.

+
Liked your review of this film. I liked it a lot more than you do, but I was happy that the first thing you mentioned was Nora Ephron's screenplay. I think the screenplay is brilliant and I don't know if you're aware of this, but the screenplay earned the film its only Oscar nomination. I also have always felt that even though Ephron is credited as the screenwriter that Billy Crystal had some unbilled input on the script.



Liked your review of this film. I liked it a lot more than you do, but I was happy that the first thing you mentioned was Nora Ephron's screenplay. I think the screenplay is brilliant and I don't know if you're aware of this, but the screenplay earned the film its only Oscar nomination. I also have always felt that even though Ephron is credited as the screenwriter that Billy Crystal had some unbilled input on the script.
I didn't know about the Oscar nom. It's another movie that I've only seen once and would benefit from another watch. One of the highlights for me was seeing Carrie Fisher in something other than Star Wars.



Captain, why do you love it? You don't have any kids do you?

I should probably see it again, I'm guessing it's the type of movie that gets better with repeat viewings. It would be worth it for Mary Steenburgen. Are you a fan of hers?
Oh yes - I had a bit of a crush on Mary in this movie (and others)! She has a sweetness in her eyes when she smiles that's hard to describe.

So that's one reason - not sure why I like it so much. It's nothing like my family (so maybe that's a plus!) although certain aspects of Robard's attitude reminded me a bit of my own father.

I liked the cast and I like large ensemble movies. It's a bit of a laugh / cry movie and I like that, and it's got a message about family (and Grandma's rollercoaster analogy to life) and leaves you with a somewhat more positive view on life.

I could always relate to Steve Martin's sense of overwhelm (despite having no children myself) and his coming around to step back and view all the ups and downs as part of the ride.

Indeed, it's one of those movies I liked more each time I saw it.

I thought Ron Howard did a good job of interweaving the stories of the different facets of the family = each sibling's family is very different with different sets of problems, yet all interconnected to the whole, like most families. (And hey... it's got Rick Moranis singing! )

One thing I could never figure out: Tom Hulce - he had such a huge hit with Amadeus (1985) - another great movie - that I thought his career would skyrocket after the movie won Best Picture - but it just seemed to fizzle as he never went beyond bit parts.




Back to the Future (1985)
Director: Robert Zemeckis
Writers: Robert Zemeckis, Bob Gale
Cast: Michael J. Fox, Christopher Lloyd, Lea Thompson, Crispin Glover
Genre: Adventure, Comedy, Sci-Fi


"Marty McFly, a 17-year-old high school student, is accidentally sent thirty years into the past in a time-traveling DeLorean invented by his close friend, the eccentric scientist Doc Brown."

Loved this one and I'd seen it before but not for the longest time. It was sure a blast from the past...or is that a blast from the future?

Back to the Future just flows perfectly and I was always interested in what was happening. The film pacing and scene construction is flawless. So flawless that it actually gets studied.


The cast is great too! Originally Eric Stoltz was cast as Marty McFly. While Stoltz is a good actor he's no Marty McFly. After Stoltz left the film, the producers first choice Michael J. Fox became available. Fox is so natural in this. His comic timing and easy going demeanor with just the right bit of stumble-bumness is a perfect combination for the role.



The ungainly and awkward Crispin Glover as his nervous, flunky of a dad is equally perfect casting. I could go own with this...Lea Thompson as his mom, both young and old versions,...as well as the wonderfully colorful actor, who played Biff with such energy (Thomas F. Wilson)...both of them make the film special. And then there's the lovable, absent minded professor, Doc Brown (Christoper Lyold)...Doc Brown and Marty go together like potatoes and gravy!

The premise is so cool, with a teenager inadvertently using a DeLorean time machine to go back in time to 1955 where he meets both his mom and dad as teenagers...His own presences causes them to never date...and that's something he needs to fix pronto, so that he's not wiped out of existences.

The other thing I like is that this movie just oozes 1985! From the DeLorean to Van Halen to the jokes about then actor Ronald Regan becoming president. This is such a well though out script and such a fun movie!

++
First of all, great review CR. Didn't know they studied this 'perfect screenplay'.
What made you not rate it 5/5? It would make this ' the perfect review'



I didn't know about the Oscar nom. It's another movie that I've only seen once and would benefit from another watch. One of the highlights for me was seeing Carrie Fisher in something other than Star Wars.

So that's the real reason you watched it...I forgot you have this thing for Carrie Fisher



So that's the real reason you watched it...I forgot you have this thing for Carrie Fisher
Ha! that's funny but I actually don't have a think for Carrie Fisher, but I do like her as an actress.



Every time you review a movie with Carrie Fisher in it, you always talk about her part, no matter how minor it is and whenever you see a movie that you didn't know she was in, the first thing you say about the movie, is "I didn't know Carrie Fisher was in this!"



First of all, great review CR. Didn't know they studied this 'perfect screenplay'.
What made you not rate it 5/5? It would make this ' the perfect review'
That's a good question! I actually flipped back and forth and almost gave it a 5/5. Why didn't I? I don't know there's certainly nothing I can find in the film that's not perfectly done.



Every time you review a movie with Carrie Fisher in it, you always talk about her part, no matter how minor it is and whenever you see a movie that you didn't know she was in, the first thing you say about the movie, is "I didn't know Carrie Fisher was in this!"
I didn't realize that. I guess that's because when I think of Carrie Fisher I only think of her as Princess Leia from Star Wars. I'd never seen her in anything else until I joined MoFo. I do like her, but she's no Gloria Grahame