While I think its pretty ridiculous that a well known widely accepted category of weapons that is acknowledged in name by the manufacturers, by the sellers, by the military and by scores of gun experts and which is cited as such in dozens of books on guns, doesn’t exist technically
Im willing to give you the benefit of the doubt on the slippery slope argument you are making. But if that’s the case, then by the logic of that argument we cant have ANY restrictions on ANY type of weapon. Right? Because a gun is a gun is a gun. Do you agree with that?
You don’t think a weapon that’s by design better at killing while mobile, easier to control and aim and that delivers ammunition in a way that’s more damaging then most guns isnt more effective at killing?
The AR-15 is a semiautomatic. That means you pull the trigger once, and one bullet comes out, the same as in a plain old glock. A glock, for reference, is more or less exactly what probably pops into your head when you hear the word "handgun."
Again, the answer cant possibly be just "all or nothing" because we already have "something" built into our laws AND our Constitution. So why cant we simply adjust that "something" if we have been ok with "something" since at least the 30's? Unless of course you are actually for full out anything goes. But if you arent, if you are ok with banning fully automatic weapons and grenade launchers and bazookas etc., than how can you rule out one more weapon distinction based on the fact that it could lead to a ban of ALL guns?
But let me step back here. You guys have been peppering me with MY concepts of what would be the best course of action to deal with mass shootings.
How about you guys give me YOUR take on what could/should be done exactly that you think could help the situation in this country. You can limit your focus to JUST mass shootings if you wish since that was kind of what weve been focusing on here or you can tell me what it is you think should change with the current status quo in regards to the overall much larger issue of gun deaths in America. Is your response "nothing at all. Everything is fine" or do you envision certain actions that can be taken that seem reasonable to you?
That said, I noted earlier in this thread that overall gun violence is down, which just kinda got skipped over:
They already have. Gun homicides are at something like a 20-year low. How many people--particularly people advocating new gun laws--know that?