+4
Couldn't agree more, Annie. I'm putting the finishing touches on a thematic analysis of Up, and having seen it something like 5 or 6 times now, I'm amazed at how well it holds up. Similarly, I'm rewatching WALL-E, and it feels so much shallower. I always cringe when someone asks me to pick my favorite Pixar film, because inevitably 3 or 4 are all bunched together with only the slightest of gradations in quality between them. But the more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that Up is probably the best, and if not, it's right there.
That said, even though I completely disagree with PN's conclusion, something in his comment does resontate with me: the idea of it being made up of "unused designs" and the like. Even though I think it's a flippin' brilliant movie, it did feel kind of haphazard the first time I saw it. The individual elements aren't really of a single kind. An old man, a young boy, a bird, a dog, talking dogs, airships, a jungle environment...it's very eclectic. It doesn't fit a single theme or a style the way most animated family films do. Now, I happen to think that's a positive, and it sort of rings true more for me that way, because it feels like obvious and constructed. But I'd be lying if I said I didn't "get" how it might feel a little haphazard for some. I would, however, recommend anyone who feels this way watch it again, because I've noticed new parallels and themes each time I've seen it.