O.K. here is a movie that didn’t need a prequel “300”. Hero Complex had a chance to sit down with Frank Miller and talk about the prequel.
Hero Complex:
"Miller is preparing a follow-up now titled Xerxes, which begins about 10 years before the events of 300, and Snyder has expressed interest in it as a film property as well."
"It's the Battle of Marathon through my lens," Miller explained to Hero Complex. "I've finished the plot and I'm getting started on the artwork." The Battle of Marathon took place back in 490 BC during the first Persian invasion of Greece. It was fought between the citizens of Athens, aided by Plataea, and a Persian force commanded by Datis and Artaphernes. Source - First Showing
I’m always up for a good sword and sandals flick, but do we have to associate it with the 300. Why does Hollywood always put the title of a usually better movie in a title of a sequel or prequel to make us think the current turd there ushering out is going to be as good?
Why can’t they just title it Xerxes, and have no reference to the 300 in the story. Look if they’re going to bring back Gerard Butler, and I hope they do, then O.K. put 300 in the title, but if it’s a whole new cast then leave it alone.
I’m just tired of Hollywood making prequel after sequel after prepost version (I know that last one didn’t make sense, but it my rant so sue me) of a movie and the story not getting any better. I don’t think this last part had anything to with the article but it sure felt good!
Any who, Miller is making another movie based off the 300 THE END?
Hero Complex:
"Miller is preparing a follow-up now titled Xerxes, which begins about 10 years before the events of 300, and Snyder has expressed interest in it as a film property as well."
"It's the Battle of Marathon through my lens," Miller explained to Hero Complex. "I've finished the plot and I'm getting started on the artwork." The Battle of Marathon took place back in 490 BC during the first Persian invasion of Greece. It was fought between the citizens of Athens, aided by Plataea, and a Persian force commanded by Datis and Artaphernes. Source - First Showing
I’m always up for a good sword and sandals flick, but do we have to associate it with the 300. Why does Hollywood always put the title of a usually better movie in a title of a sequel or prequel to make us think the current turd there ushering out is going to be as good?
Why can’t they just title it Xerxes, and have no reference to the 300 in the story. Look if they’re going to bring back Gerard Butler, and I hope they do, then O.K. put 300 in the title, but if it’s a whole new cast then leave it alone.
I’m just tired of Hollywood making prequel after sequel after prepost version (I know that last one didn’t make sense, but it my rant so sue me) of a movie and the story not getting any better. I don’t think this last part had anything to with the article but it sure felt good!
Any who, Miller is making another movie based off the 300 THE END?
__________________
"SO LET IT BE WRITTEN SO LET IT BE DONE"
SO SAY'S BIG CHICO