By http://www.impawards.com/2024/beetle...ice_ver11.html, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=75976584
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice - (2024)
Here it is finally! Surprisingly, I didn't completely hate
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice, which I was really fearing all the more after a terribly wobbly and unfunny first half - but somehow Burton or something or someone really switches into gear and salvages what could have been a lot worse. It really feels like this has had 30 minutes or so cut out of it for pacing reasons, which on the one hand worked fine, but on the other left me feeling like I'd been short-changed considering what modern belated sequels usually deliver. It's sane 104 minutes adds to the feel that this film's sensibilities and tone make it a sequel that feels like it could have been made in 1989, and I'm sure nobody would have questioned anything if it had of been made back then. Soul train? Only filmmakers in their mid-60s could think such dated inventiveness deserves so much attention and repeated call-backs. Talking about too much attention - when certain jokes flop, it doesn't help to sustain the joke for a long period of time, making us shift uncomfortably in our seat, praying the film can continue some time in the near future. Sad to see Monica Bellucci and Willem Dafoe wasted in roles that promised so much more. All that said though, Keaton has enough charisma to bring this old classic character back to life (that line in the original : I've seen the EXORCIST ABOUT A HUNDRED AND SIXTY-SEVEN TIMES, AND IT KEEPS GETTING FUNNIER EVERY SINGLE TIME I SEE IT... - that's one of my favourites.) What amazed me was that some of the jokes really worked, and that there was so much more energy in this than I expected - nobody is embarrassed to be here, and although some narrative twists really don't work, it mostly fits together surprisingly neatly. I was actually enjoying myself at times - almost had to pinch myself to be sure that was really happening. A mixed bag to be sure - the very definition of a mixed bag - but it wasn't awful by a long shot (just awful at times.) Overall, it's worth seeing if you feel the urge to do so, like I did.
Winona Ryder - I didn't think that was a really great performance, but I hope the audience loves you regardless and you do okay.
6/10
By https://neweuropefilmsales.com/featurefilms/, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=71834776
Godland - (2022)
Godland doesn't totally rely on it's stunning photography - it has a lot more going for it - but that is one aspect that really sets it apart. I found it ironic that Iceland should have so few witnesses to it's splendour and magnificence, but I guess that's one of the reasons it's kept that beauty intact up until now. It's as if the God that Lucas (Elliott Crosset Hove) believes in made that place for those who can appreciate what it takes to survive it and still have faith this all means something. Full review
here, in my watchlist thread.
8/10